i think most people will adopt the native culture under normal cercomstances, however this is not the case in extreme cercomstances which you as a social engineer cannot always predict and can not always prevent.

mass immigation is an example of an extreme cercomstance

I mean, Our pal Aryan over there says we should just *force* everyone not white to leave.

another example is whatever the fuck is going on with black people in america

I don't think it's NECESSARY to do so.

i would disagree with his move

except maybe in europe for anyone whos part of the mass immigation there

because those huge population spikes will become cultural problems over time

just ending immigration there wont solve those, but id also be willing not to solve those for a compramise of shutting down immigration

see personally im just anti-immigration in general with no personal reguards for identity politics

As for the US, let's say you were to drop the safety net, to a degree.

Actually allow for a true failure state for individuals.

Regardless of race

failure state?

As in, no comfort in welfare.

interesting the first thing that came to my mind with failure state was ironicly creating a state for people who dont want to be american but also dont wanna live anywhere else 😛

I mean, that's also a possibility.

A far more realistic one.

If we could bring Federalism back to full force

Instead of waging these battles in the federal government

you mean actually have state rights again?

states could actually experiment with socialism if they so choose.

i was actually thinking about that earlier today. i have a theory that the evolution of information media has lead to the greater unionization of people in the united states and abroad because the speed of information has increased and now you know what your neighbers are doing and people have grown a tendency to push their ideology any way they can so use federal powers to supress ideologys elsewhere in the country even through the state laws there dont actually effect them. and this has lead to the homogenization of the united states but also a polerization of politics

Isn’t this California?

california isint socialist they are decadent

Things I'm trying to subvert with a state-based media company for 200, trebek.

Yea but they basically just ignore the federal government and do whatever they want

It's funny how right I think that is, Arch.

only good thing about them, unfortunately what they do and want is diplorible and selfish

they have like a huge fraction of our countrys economy

thats why they can do that

but they arnt socialist, they love capitalism under the facade

corporatism and capitalism are two different things.

Capitalism empowers the citizen.

if they went socialist they would give more power to the working class and that just wouldent suit them

I do have to agree though, it’s pretty amazing listening to Americans tell people of other nations how they should live, and listening to people from Europe, Australia, & Asia telling me how I should want to live

It’s quite amusing

In capitalism in it's truest form, the value you bring to society is directly converted into currency, which is the power to influence said society.

capitalist corporatism is an extention of capitalism though that simply is one of the means of businesses being privilaged above citiziens

it undermines the democracy but it is still capitalistic

Its not different from socialism taken to its extreme. Under extreme corporatism, the control lies with the corporations, under socialism, the government.