newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 265/350
| Next
Is anyone aware of any good articles on how professional progressive protest groups are funded?
I know of a few that are related. Why?
There was an image floating around that supposedly showed instructions Kavanaugh protesters were to follow when they got paid.
I'm having issues convincing someone that there is big money that is funneled down through multiple not-for-profits in order to keep these activities going.
I don't have anything on that. But look into Days of Rage. It documents how some non-profits were used to fund bombings in the late 60s and early 70s.
Thanks, I'll start with that.
That's actually something the document alleged. It was instructions for OpSec to prevent the relevant non-profits (the claim usually being that the non-profit involved was related to the OSF) from being named.
If you search around for Kavanaugh protesters being paid, you should find something, but not all information is reliable and it's hard to convince people of anything, even if you have the documents yourself.
Well, It's tricky
Because it wasn't outright denial
But an equivalency claim, as though there is even a remotely plausible comparison between Patriot Prayer and the endless "Centers for American X,Y,Z"
So, I don't know. Unlikely to be worth doing major research on this - unlikely to be convincing.
Very frustrating though.
Do look into Days of Rage. It's a fascinating read and worth the time.
The Centers for American X,Y, Z aren't quite the same as Patriot Prayer. They usually want to look like they are taking the high road whereas Patriot Prayer wants to look powerful and on-the-ground.
That said, there is definitely money being funneled into groups like BAMN from the various left-leaning centers, companies and advocacy organizations.
And BAMN is much more like Patriot Prayer than your Centers for X, Y, Z
Yeah, that makes sense. I was hoping for something that compares the financing rather than their strategies or objectives.
That's going to be hard to find. The most reliable thing is to acquire tax filings.
Patriot Prayer being more of an organic street protest movement.
But that could be challenging on it's own.
And most of the relevant organizations won't reveal funding ANTIFA or ANTIFA aligned groups.
Yeah.
They'll funnel it under other headlines to make it hard.
But there is money flowing all around and not all of it is hidden.
The leaders of the Women's March are all getting paid quite handsomely.
And you can see *some* of the endorsements and sponsors if you look.
Obama was a full time activist (like the leaders of the Womens' March) and lists some of the organizations him and his fellow political operatives would gain control of to funnel money into their activities.
It's really likely to be a dead end convincing wise.
The Ford Foundation is singled out in his book, for example.
You can make the case.
Remember you aren't necessarily trying to convince the other person immediately.
It's all about onlookers and pointing out the facts to someone so they can change their minds later.
Except if these are private conversations. But your point is well taken.
From what I can tell, Patriot Prayer lacks any real backing. ANTIFA sometimes has backing depending on the cell.
Most ANTIFA cells probably lack financial support.
----
Why does only Breitbart report on this? If this is true, this could be the start of a lawsuit against Facebook for anti-competitive behavior.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/12/facebook-blocks-links-to-free-speech-competitor-minds/
ayy
So I learn something
From this angle, they look a lot a like.
Because China is what libs wanna be?
I doubt they were ever in China
they should watch more SerpentZA videos
Yeah, will be interesting what Trump will do about Twitter.
best thing to move his account to Gab or Minds.
could you IMAGINE if he moved to Gab?
It'd be infested with normies so fast though.
Yes and gab.ai isn't a Silicon Valley Company, is it not?
so two flys with one hit
If Gab fills up with normies that just means we'll get to use mute and ban as they were originally intended.
There is a large audience of pedos on youtube with channels making content designed for them. Cya. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEdgcKLDx6Q
Pretty sure tim covered that before
only the smartest ppl in government
bye morrison
What will go wrong with the "OK to be white" Motion....
and why vote against it?
if she was smart, she'd also added 2 poiints: a) its OK to be white
b) its OK to be black/Muslim
And vote on each individually
At this time you have to be out for maximum carnage...
Robot give canned answers to scripted questions.
@Poppy Rider so no difference from a human politician?
stupid innit, But at least they are trying.
MPs to be given a protected status online. This can't end badly.
What the fuck
no 1st amendment. we dont have the right to petition our gov. they can just call it harrasment
I'm in the UK mate, I'm just... horrified
Time to write a letter to our MPs explaining why this is a shit idea as if you were explaining it to a child.
They know what they're doing
<:timcat:463067464016855040>
@Vigil Don't give them too much credit.
Oh they definitely know. The UK govt are seriously authoritarian
The Gov may be but your average MP is just along for the ride.
I haven't even had my coffee yet.
Yes
Yeeeeeees
I need to get better at the violin
Gotta pull a Nero when shit goes down
This is hilarious if true. Warren may have had an ancestor that rounded up Cherokee Indians.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2012/05/08/elizabeth-warren-ancestor-trail-of-tears/
Why do they call LGBT and disabled people pussies when ever they get the chance.
As if they are weak and need extra help.
she's still trying to salvage this
<:NotLikeThis:313332634153517067>
That was a long thread. She seems mad.
shes watching as everything goes tits up
native american tits up
this isn't going well for her whatsoever
Make the wrong move and this whole mob will tear you apart instead.
Stop dancing and you die.
Kinda grim if you put it like that
remember though, the right is usualyl quick to accept these "outcasts"
Well... usually from what Ive seen
She's so dumb
owned
cool story bro
meaning
This is a legal and effective way of protesting someone. People like Tucker Carlson deserve to told to go fuck themselves at every possible opportunity.
I am not suggesting that in any circumstance you threaten Carlson with harm, or behave in a manner that causes him to feel threatened. That is illegal. There are many ways to make your displeasure of a person known and shouting โFuck youโ at them is a pretty good one. You could also ask Carlson repeatedly and loudly why he insists on recycling white nationalist talking points on his show every week. He wonโt answer you, but you can ask him those things until the restaurant asks one or both of you to leave.
Why does Tucker Carlson deserve to be told to go fuck himself?
because "There is absolutely no reason that Tucker Carlson, or Kirstjen Nielsen, or Ted Cruz, or Sarah Huckabee Sanders should be able to enjoy a meal in public without hearing from the public."
Oh, you're saying that ironically.
you're damn right
this article is everything that's wrong with the regressive left
I remember when I just wanted to laugh and play video games.
One gamergate later and here I am.
Sometimes you just can't win, know what I mean?
whats a good way to lose? Take neutral actors and make them the enemy
the article says he spreads white nat talking points
in which case, it'd be perfectly understandable to be angry at him
does he.. spread them?
people need to breath air is a white nat talking point
Screeching 'Fuck you!' at someone is as NPC as it gets.
Yeah, that's who we're thinking of. Not Juanita Broaddrick or anyone else you helped silence.
"Trump denies offering $1 million for Warren DNA test, even though he did" by Jordan Fabian, The Hill, 10/15/18
The Hill falsely says that Trump now owes Warren $1 million for taking the DNA test and proving she is Indian. They reference a speech from earlier this year in which Trump had said "I will give you a million dollars, paid for by Trump, to your favorite charity, if you take the test and it shows youโre an Indian." The Hill selectively quoted this, completely leaving out the context in which it was spoken. Trump had been saying this in the context of "Let's say I'm debating Pocahantas." He was clearly talking about this in the hypothetical, saying that he would make this offer to her in the future. The Hill and a slew of other media outlets are ignoring this important context and simply including the quote that supports their claims that he now owes a million dollars. He doesn't owe a cent.
http://archive.is/9XriV
Credit to http://reddit.com/r/HeadlineCorrections
<:thonk:432992056214945818>
she's also... not native
even if he had promised to pay, the test doesn't help the case
Yeah, Trump really messed this up.
He had the opportunity to drive home the fact that she's really not a Native American but instead just denied the bet.
Yeah, he could have really shat on Warren...
She already proved she isnโt Native American.
And he didnโt make the bet.
He talked hypothetically about a debate tactic.
And if you look at what heโs saying about it, he is hammering it home. Heโs pointed out that sheโs 1/1000 Native American and that the Cherokee tribe has rebuked her.
Trump may not have access to $1M in liquid cash of his own, and his assets have to be held in trust while he is president.
Any pressure from the left to get Trump to donate $1M to charity might be some scheme to catch him in a campaign finance law violation or an ethic conflict.
Also yeah, she completely self-owned and proved she is not Cherokee hence Trump wins the bet anyway.
Hereโs the video proving the media is lying about what Trump said regarding the DNA test. The full video with the context. What they show is a deceptive edit.
https://youtu.be/YxdlLDug3Os
By any means, Trump would have been alot more effective if he'd mockingly referred to her 1/1024 distinction and upped the ante somehow.
She's pretty clearly not Native American and he could have really driven it home.
"1/1024 doesn't count"
Does everyone else move there mouse to cover Tims mouse when he reads stuff?
And always loose the place because he runs his mouse a line lower instead of over what he reads?
@pratel he said that!!!
Repeatedly! The fist lady even laughed about it by his side as he said it
@pratel watch it here
https://youtu.be/a3SZsduBW3c
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45875004
remember to #believeallwomen
can someone give me a role that allows embedding <:NPC:500042527231967262>
this is what embed says
Paris attack fake victim jailed for fraud
Alexandra Damien, 33, was found guilty of fraud and perjury after passing herself off as a victim.
phillip covered this today
@aukkras who is that?
defranco, youtuber ๐
he is so neutral its basically just text to speech news
except when he has to stop to remind everyone that he doesn't agree with Trump every trump story.
Or when he wusses out on free speech :^)
Isnโt he one of those Better Help cucks?
Yea he's the ring leader of better help scam basically
Phil's marketing company partnered with better help
Someone has idea where and when was this shot ?
https://twitter.com/JoShawTx/status/1052235702740561921
Technically, Betterhelp isn't really a scam, and DeFranco has been upfront about what has been going on, even severing his partnership with the Betterhelp company.
This is a thing.
*This is a thing.*
***This is a thing.***
Yep. Tim covered it in his video on his main channel on Oct 13.
Oof, missed it.
I just discovered there's other stories that were similar too.
Cornerstone Caroline
Permit Patty
Coupon Carl
ID Adam
Pool Patrol Paula
and BBQ Becky
Better believe survivors and Lynch him
In other words, the white liberals from Get Out
TL;DR??
I've seen that but didn't read it...
basically...
"Why did millions of Obama voters switch to Trump? New study says they're simply racist."
50% of americans are racist?
maybe you need to redefine what is called "racist"?
only 50%
i quess its only racism when it suits lefts narrative.
and blacks voting for gibs for them cant be racist.
50%?
obviously anyone who voted for trump is racist.
you should know that its 2018 and all.๐
trump got like 26% of eligible votes
ok so 26% are racist, 26% are democrats and 48% are dumb?
that seems to be the Democrat message :^)
misogynistic. because they diditn vote for hilary
everyone who voted for white president is racist, lol ๐
yeah. you should vote someone who is 1/1024 native american.
dont you know if you are white you are racist. unless you are part of LTGB...... then you are also opressed.
Technically, it only said that voters who went from Obama to Trump never switched because of economic anxiety, but racial anxiety and xenophobia.
just anther ways of saying anti white.
problem is that the study itself, or at least the article
describes it as a study to get to a particular conclusion
rather then finding out what the reasons are
According to the article they only went with 2 angles
Racism or economic
that is not a legit way to find out why anyone switched from obama to trump
Well, technically it would be social or economic. Plus, I think it's the only angles they can tackle since those are the two main pillars of what forms a political belief. If there are other angles they could have explored, then absolutely they should have explored it.
yea but economic is 1 thing
thats a pretty general term you can broadly use
Social however, you cant just use racism and leave it at that
then your starting position is already that racism is the only social reason people had.
Then you are basically treating obama as a token black president and nothing else
if u follow what i mean here
Apparently legally owning an transportating your long gun is considered a "dangerous cache of weapons"
Still on this
"I didn't see any bad behavior by [Kavanaugh] personally, but it's hard for me to imagine all the things people are saying aren't true,"
๐ซ
u got some seriously fucked up imagination then
called:
Mass hysteria
False flag to justify more land grabs.
Not really news but there is never enough 'socialism sucks'
https://twitter.com/BBCWorld/status/1052144903210393600
but there was no war in chrimea.
they voted for joining russia.
it always was russian. just some soviet leader from ukraine decided to gift it to ukraine, and when UDSSR broke, it was gone
when east germany was given back to west germany, the whole world cheered.
do the same with crimea and everyone loses their mind.
Crimea has a total population of 2,248,400
1,492,000 are russians
second largest group are ukrainians with 344,500
so i don't see a problem there
if you don't dress up at all, and go as the white male you were born as, is that already unappropriate?
Whoa, suddenly solid evidence matters <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/17/theres-still-no-evidence-bob-menendez-slept-with-underage-prostitutes-new-attack-ad-says-it-anyway/
#BelieveSurvivors
Another Video from Matt about Portland
Why is such a person in Power? And why did he forbid the Police to do anything??
bob menendez is corrupt but like just doing coke with hookers and taking bribes level corrupt aka Perfect Embodimeint of a Jersey politician
This will end badly "Thanks to the 2007 State of Oregon v. Sandoval ruling by the state Supreme Court, Oregon doesnโt require a โduty to retreat,โย "
"(5) A person may use physical force upon another person in self-defense or in defending a third person, in defending property, in making an arrest or in preventing an escape, as hereafter prescribed in chapter 743, Oregon Laws 1971. [1971 c.743 ยง21; 1981 c.246 ยง1; 2011 c.665 ยง10]"
yes, let the antisemitism flow
the left will be happy, and they will keep calling the right nazis
>boycotting murderous state
>anti-semite
umm what?
unrelated note, nice that the state can't force business to do business with other countries
@Jasse oh, are they boycotting all the middle east?
Of course they aren't. Got to have those double standards.
also its a joke, because there is antisemitism in the left. like straight up fuck the jews
Making it crime to be homeless is bull shite. Some of these ppl can't hold down a home, that's why they are on the street. These are the sort of ppl that would jump on ship that set out on a two year round trip to somewhere over there. What purpose does making it a crime serve?
they just like to hide it by calling the right nazis
@Poppy Rider it looks bad, thats the "crime"
11,000 shelter spots, 20,000 homeless. Set up a tent so you don't freeze to death, you're a criminal.
Horrible cunts.
why shouldnt people blame jews for their actons.๐ค
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 265/350
| Next