Yeah and since he pleaded guilty

That happened no ?

No

His lawyer wasn't even there

I am no legal expert so cant say how that works

In fact, his laywer had been actively -lied- to about proceedings.

It was very fast for sure

Very fast is an understatement.

I can only say that it sure looks like he broke the suspension on that sentence

So its hard for me imagine him getting away on technicalities with it

Being denied a lawyer or having the state interfere in justice proceedings is hardly a technicality

It's very easy for me

This is a full blown case of criminal mistrial.

He was denied the right to legal council, literally a right equally fundamental to a fair trial as the very concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'

This is not a case of 'oh, his name was spelled 'Tomy' on the official documents so it's mistrial, he goes free'

Well but can you throw the case on those grounds is what i am asking. Because he did broke that suspension and filmed himself doing that

Yes.

Well it will be interesting watching that

In any properly functioning legal system, not only would you be able to throw the case, you would be able to get the judge -barred from office-

Well it did look strange

You'd be able to get so much money in reparations their grand children would still be paying you

Fast track trial with media blackout

But the core of the case

Him breaking the suspension is valid

Again, that wasn't properly established.

Unfortunately

It wasnt properly establiahed but even i can see it happened

He filmed himself doing that

Irrelevant what someone can 'see' happening.

You mean everyone

You can have literally millions of eye witnesses, someone is -innocent- until the opposite is proven by due process in a court of law.

True

Thats the reason why he got into trouble in the first place afterall

But you have to admit that in propper trial he would lose

Again, doubtful, as I've seen plenty of arguments as to why he's innocent.

Why ?

I have seen arguments why the law is bad

But none to why he could not have break it

He arguably wasn't reporting from court property, I've seen people claim he wasn't reporting on the case, and merely using the courthouse as a backdrop...

Come now 😀

Thats very weak

If any of this is true or not, I dunno, we've not had a proper trial to establish the facts.

No but we can have opinion

And he clearly did reported on the case

In real time

During court proceedings

Thats the problem

To paraphrase Jean-Luc Picard: "A trial is a crucible, in it we burn away irrelevancies until we are left with a pure product: The truth." This 'crucible' was tainted, willingly so, and as such, to protect the concept of innocent until proven guilty, a mistrial must be declared and Tommy has to walk free. His guilt is, due to the actions taken against him, utterly irrelevant now.

Well it will be interesting for sure

@>Cytos, de lieve goede synth ironically, people are usually more likely to get a sunburn, because they are less likely to put on sunscreen or seek shade, but are still in the sun the whole time.

@zutt @Somi regardless of the truth, if there is not a fair trail, you cannot say with 100% certainty it was the truth. He may very well have lost a trail.... but he may not have. that is the point of legal counsel. He did ask what was considered court grounds to one of the officers or officials standing outside the court. This could be reference to trying to avoid breaking the law again. There is also where he reported any more than what other news outlets were reporting. But since the well was tainted, he could very well be let go....which is ironically what the defense of the media ban on the very trail he was reporting on is to prevent. to keep potentially guilty people from being let free because the trail is tainted by media coverage that has cause the jurors to be bias.

(this, ironically, despite the fact that the jurors' potential bias was irrelevant, as the case he was at was simply at the sentencing stage already, not in the midst of procedure)

Well its interesting for sure

there is a 3rd group being tried in September that is related to this trail

I myself dont think it was worth it

while these guys were found guilty, the 3rd group might have innocent people in it

which is why the media ban is still in place

who's bright idea this was? maybe some activist in the court system trying to keep this quiet as long as possible, who knows

>footage of Luik attacker shouting aloha snackbar

>"he has the profile of a repeat offender, not a terrorist"

lmao

how about, if you call your god great in arabic, and murder people while doing it, we can consider it political violence aka terrorism

Check this out. ABC story on Roseanne getting canceled in both links. It’s the same story, but they changed the original title which was “ Roseanne canceled after stars controversial comments” to “ Roseanne canceled after Roseanne Barr’s racist tweet”

First version http://archive.today/h4jla

Second version http://archive.today/KdO52

Why did they change it?

guessing someone complained that it wasnt contrversial

@Timcast
On Friday: 13 months in prison for reporting on the court case.

Today apparently it is okay to report on that court case.

That is just one working day later.

Here is the court record:

Is there a mistake here????

http://www.thelawpages.com/court-hearings-lists/Leeds-Crown-Court.php

This seems to be the same trial that the previous day caused TR to be locked up
(I would upload a screen shot but that option not on this channel)

Lol

If Roseanne is actually getting canceled I hope Fox picks it up.

It’s guaranteed money

@CreativeRealms I don't know how anyone can watch that show

I'm not a fan of the SJW stuff they added but at least it isn't as bad as most other shows these days.

My wife loves it.

New Tim Pool vid is up.
https://youtu.be/N9GfcjwUQTg

na man I can't listen to roseanne speak without hearing that noise when you scrap a chalkboard

Hahahahaha!
“ Musk Bros”
These people are clowns.

all i can think of is her national anthem

musk bros must smell awful.

thats pretty bait https://twitter.com/georgellewelyn/status/1001507438372179968?s=20

https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1001483150449557504

"You nitpicking spoons."

She has a Skyrim background. o:

100% a man.

Does tim count as muskbro ?

<:GWtogaPagChomp:384871972229742592>

Also

Elon Musk is basically a scientific businessman

two of the leading companies of science in their fields

HOW IS HE AGAINST SCIENCE?

I find interesting that she can recognize your race from your twitter acc

right, is that scientific sample?

I would have thought that tech journos are smarter then that lel

pretty much all journalists fall in a similar bucket these days

Well in my experience the science reporters are extra bad

probably becasue they think they are extra smart

They dont take time to research their topic

And then print loads of nonsense

same with tech journalists, a la gizmodo, engadget, the verge, and ugh, ars technica

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1001507474946560000

lol https://twitter.com/HackneyAbbott/status/843730430759198720?s=20

Elon v the daily beast