and it was really hard to buy at the time anyway so i said meh

and you gave him a pair of cement shoes for that advice?

but I ended up generating around 20btc through various means becuase I thought it was interesting

didnt see any faucet sites?

sold it all around 20$

I used the faucet

when your investment goes up over 20x you sell

Tim have you seen dave cullens new video?

sounds mental

that sounds like that southpark episode where they bet the town treasury at that casino, and then tried to double it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvXOfq3AB8s

yeah that one

Sounds like EU started to go full 1984 and is tring to tax us to the ground

means I wouldnt be able to watch Tims videos until we brexit

@wacka nah, lost half of it on Mt.Gox

dont worry i'm sure Theresa May will adopt it for you

Would be a couple of millions today if I kept them all

oh did you get that letter they sent out? the weirdly 3 folded letter?

from mt gox

lol what is journalism? https://twitter.com/Ademsmahi24/status/1001796592695947265?s=20

if thats not a libel case I dont know what is

fukin hell. How many of these pieces of shit are written by robots?

lol.. good joke an all... but Im guessing shes blaming the tiredness.. not the medications 😛 https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1001835705499291648?s=20

racism? no. lack of filter keeping you from sounding racist? very likely

people need to start looking at patterns of behavior not words.

saying something racist doesn't mean you are actually racist. Repeated actions that seem racial motivated, on the other hand, does.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180525/10072939912/forget-gdpr-eus-new-copyright-proposal-will-be-complete-utter-disaster-internet.shtml

Im sure shes been on the "the view"(?) (the one with whoopi) a few times... next time shes on that will be a ratings puller... getting a dress down from whoopi

whoopi loves her high horse

but in the "not in my backyard" etist of the left envied by the rich white women of upper class suburbs, bad words and contradicting thoughts and facts must be blocked out because if its out of sight and out of mind, it doesn't exist.

"link tax" - wew lad

that assassinated russian journalist just turned up at a press conference 😛

is 2018 a movie?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvXOfq3AB8s

fair use under attack if no action: https://saveyourinternet.eu/about-this-campaign/

as we saw with GDPR it will be implemented across internet no matter where you are

vote in EU parliament 20.06.2018

i'm better off blocking EU nations than paying link taxes

you don't understand.... big platforms enforce this rules on all ...

since they don't want to pay EU

they deemed responsible for all published on their platforms...

https://www.vox.com/2018/5/29/17405716/active-shooter-steam-valve-corp-video-game

Wow. That petition from yesterday wasn't a fake after all.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/diane-black-porn-school-gun-violence_us_5b0d6634e4b0568a880ede65

that link name 👀

I am Zeta: Researcher of odd news.

I'm known on Jeff Holiday's server for just finding the most bizarre shit.

@athene big platforms would only enforce it to all IF there was still money in dealing business in the EU. Between GDPR and this, it might just make them go "well, fuck the EU. cost of business is too high"

>porn school gun violence

ummm......

nah... they will implement filters

facebook thought they met the rules for GDPR.... and was then hit with a bunch of lawsuits they now need to pay to deal with.

btw just came across this article that might interest creators:

http://datadrivenjournalism.net/news_and_analysis/how_to_watchdog_algorithms_qa_with_nick_diakopoulous

it would easier for them to either drop the EU, or disable all links, delete anything with x.xx, and not allow uploads

small lawsuits against billions they might pay EU

its their politics ... implement rules through money pressure...

there is 710 mil ppl in EU28

thats it?

just to put my conspiracy hat on for a sec... I wonder if the EU wanted US businesses like twitter and facebook to stop working in the EU, so an EU alternative could appear

they are incredibly protectionist

at this rate, china might be easy for facebook to get into, and more financially beneficial

wacka i think not... to much debate and opinions crossing the pond

fuck, investing in infrastructure in india might a better investment than changes this drastic to their system.

ppl became restless

@wacka no, socialist just don't understand that business are not made of free money (just like they don't understand the people they tax are not a piggy bank either), and that changes cost money. both for the government and companies.

its opposite acctually... repressing new players more likely... policy, platforms, media etc

global players established... no need for new distruptive patterens to appear i guess

my conspiracy theory hat 😉

however, given how potentially far reaching, it could put most internet sites out of business. which could, in theory, result in pressures from all over the world to repeal their policy.

also could lead to some sites boycotting the EU.

proactivity is always better than reacting... as now.... if you are proactive you prepare all that necessary for your idea... others can only be cought offguard and hastly react + not forsee all consequencess

i wonder what the potential for international fallout might be.

i mean, with GDPR, most people were more or less fine with it. But fair use? that is controversial. People are always pushing that boundary

and the US failing media?

anyway internet infuencers should talk about it since they are the ones under attack the most.... others will survive... that is why there is silence about it

well private buisness can do what they like in US

so if forced somewhere else...

and it benefits main actors in US also

and risk UK actors uploading using VPNs or Spoofing to get around UK law?

this entire act is to hold the hosts of the information, not the uploaders, liable

if they allow anything with a UK copyright to be uploaded, they are fucked

it will be implemented accross internet... no matter what... wait.. wil find some articles about this...

you just said they can do what they like in the US, yet admit they wont

i'm agreeing here

but the US failing media don't have the money to get around this stuff and in youtube/facebook/twitter/google add these filters, they will have major problems.

can't find rly good reference to this discusion but I found this article instead that might help in the future for posting without platforms:

https://medium.com/read-write-participate/internet-filtering-is-obsolete-in-a-decentralized-web-bf570b05fce1

oh and you are right.. fb didn't implement gdpr to all users:

Having said it would follow GDPR “in spirit”, Facebook’s actions tell a different story. On Wednesday Reuters reported that the company would change its terms of service so that its 1.5 billion non-European users would no longer be covered by the privacy law. Until now, all users outside of the US and Canada have been governed by terms of service agreed with the company’s international headquarters in Ireland. Since any user data processed in Ireland will soon fall under GDPR, Facebook is changing the agreement so users in Africa, Asia, Australia and Latin America are governed by more lenient US privacy laws.

Where it needs to comply with GDPR, Facebook seems to have focused its efforts on getting user consent for its data collection practices () rather than reducing the data it collects. It has developed a sequence of consent requests that explicitly outline how each type of data will be used. However, as the company has designed these requests in a way that makes it harder to opt out than opt in.

okay, so then all people in the EU need to do is use Tor

are you 100% sure yt will not implement filters for it all over the platform? It is under copyright disguise

apparently there are conservatives on roseannes side... all Im seeing is condemnation from everyone but ok https://twitter.com/JarrettHill/status/1001530006231597056?s=20

he really gotcha'd that strawman

is it ok to not give a fuck because roseanne is annoying and it was a shitty sitcom?

its about free speech and racism debate... when you cross the line I guess.... I am from EU and am allowed to say my friends that are monkeys.. but I guess If one would be black american it would be insulting... since history... it was insulting to aristocrates when darwin said it first also lol ... point of view ... but context matter ... also... to you americans: How much % black to be considered black?

she was allowed to say it, but even free speech doesn't protect you from repercussions.

She is an idiot and is annoying, but people liked her show apparently. i think this is just a chance for another network to steal it

So CBD is banned, but YouTube only cracks down on creators who post videos that include ads for CBD companies? No concerns about those, some with tons of subscribers, who discuss at length the benefits of CBD?

Mhmm. we'll see if Fox picks it up and if some of the bleeding hearts on that show want to continue with that network.

there is a difference between selling something, and discussing it