newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 252/350
| Next
Lindsey Graham is dumb
And he has a woman's name
lul
remember when he ran for president
and got less votes than jeb?
Jeb "please clap" Bush lul
And soon the harassment will start for them too. This is getting ridiculous and we're rapidly approaching something very, very bad.
the word "ridiculous" is starting to lose meaning, I've been using it so much
I've gone to using Redonkulous, which I stole from Total Drama _______
By any means. I expect we will get a repeat of the Ted Cruz situation in front of Lindsey Graham's house soon. That's not good. This personal harassment and protest is going to end badly
Oh you know how this ends?
A female republican Raped at a Gas Station.
That was a good show
Total Drama? Yeah
Didnt see the world tour though
there is a new season coming eventually..or at least coming on Netflix
It's scary that retributive rape for social justice might actually be plausible.
People on twitter salty about Kavanaugh are already heading in that direction
Oh I am not even talking about "for social justice" I am just thinking Mob Mentality, how do you think "Mobbing them at the gas station" like Finestien suggested ends ?
How long until one of these "flash mobs" at a restaurant go on until some guy decides to follow behind a female member of the party and just says "fuck it she is a Nazi she deserves it."
https://www.reddit.com/r/censorship/comments/9j7yt5/the_act_which_will_censor_americans_internet_to/ Interesting thread about internet censorship coming to US @Timcast
Claire Lehman is on the Rubin Report. That's one I need to watch and not simply listen to ๐
@aukkras now that's scary. Is there a good, credible write up beyond a reddit post?
I should say, a sizeable number of people here do not like Reddit and will refuse to use it.
I think EFF is credible source. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/state-lawmakers-want-block-pornography-expense-your-free-speech-privacy-and-hard - this is what he linked
True, but it's also an activist organization.
You want something that looks more neutral if possible.
Even if it isn't.
no that shit needs to be highlighted
that sounds like one of the scummiest two faced bills i've read in awhile
Agreed.
It also seems like the kind of thing that would be abused.
Google already implements all sorts of filters they don't tell you about, but it would say you won't have an alternative should the need arise.
I'm rather agnostic but the writing on the bills website
*Sexโ is good.* ***God made it.*** *But โhealthy sexโ is all about context.*
how about fuck the fuck off
"God made sex" is a homophobic stance
This reminds me of a TradCath argument against the PUA lifestyle I heard recently, that it and hypergamy make sex a product to be consumed, and governments want consumers because they're easier to control. Which goes well with the language here ``` โSexโ is good. God made it. But โhealthy sexโ is all about context. Sex is powerful,and a government that cares about its people will pass laws to better enable and encourage its citizens to have sex in settings that accord with โthe truth about our natureโ and โthe truth about the way things are.โ```
A government isn't supposed to care about it's people.
Stop personifying government, people.
As much as I'm for the message, it's not government's message to send!
You cannot fix culture with law!
Do you want fascism? Because that's how you get fascism.
Some people do want fascism
Even if they say they're anti-fascism
Inb4 a train of accusers.
which of these is better:
Jeff "no better nickname" Flake?
Jeff "I'm a" Flake?
Jeff "Spineless" Flake
Yeah, basically
And it'll get more absurd too
Dems will have a whole week for smear campaigns and "victim" coaching.
Expect an actual rape case this time
Kav will be the one who's raped.
Even less credible, but still alleged
@Risotto for what littel I know of scripture, Sex was just *a thing*. God didn't intend it to exist
there's a passage somewhere where God, or jesus, don't quote me, laments that humans aren't a-reproducing or something but that if they must sex, do it in wedlock because that makes it holy or something
Before widespread Christianity there was neoplatonism which gave us the concept of natural law
The doctrine of 'natural law' constitutes a particular subset of the larger question of the place of reason and philosophy in theological ethics. Its adherents tend to be Roman Catholic, but not always so. Its meaning is anything but unproblematic and obvious. In spite of having been subject to wave after wave of criticism in the history of philosophy and theology, natural law continues to appeal to those who believe that ethics must be grounded in being and the moral life based on what is good for human beings. Periodic disclosures of human wickedness and horrorsยญ lynchings, secret police abductions, or death squad assassinations-reawaken our sense of the importance of objective moral standards to which evil-doers can be held accountable. Reminders of human goodness inspire gratitude for positive moral capacities bestowed on us by the Creator and elicited by grace.
Often this comes up in modern times with the "Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve" argument
inb4:
FBI: "we didn't have enough time to really learn anything"
Dems: "We need to give the FBI more time, say a month? so they finish around Nov 5?"
Reps: *rolling over*
Did you guys hear what happened in Sweden today?
?
A 65 year old woman was sentenced to 3 month in prison for hate speech. After 8 anti-islam posts in a Facebook group
No surprises. Link?
I can only find swedish articles. But heres one. Maybe you can translate it.
The more I hear shit like this the more I'm tempted to make a bunch of fake accounts in places like Britain and make slightly racist shitposts to waste their resources.
I actually think people should start consider building a botnet.
And use it to flood the censors.
You guys should be very happy with your first ammenment. Writing a facebook post (that wasnโt even racist according to me) gives you a harder sentence then raping women in Sweden
That was like reading a soviet show trial โน๏ธ
Indeed
How can critisism on islam be โracistโ? Like islam isnโt a race.
Doesn't matter to the CTRL-Left
Across the sund in Denmark. There is parliament election in the spring of 2019. In order to combat fake news facebook have made an agreement with a fact check site. They are to monitor all post in regards to the upcoming election. They have mandate to label a post as โfake newsโ and if a Facebook account is posting multiple fake news stories, they can lock the account for further posting, besides also blocking a post for being shared.
My issue is they are owned by a Mandag Morgen (monday morning) they describe them self as a hybrid think tank and news/pr agency. But they are registered as public affairs agency with the ministry of economy and business affairs. Side note they also operate the news service altinget, a left leaning poli news site, like the US politico news site.
Other side note they are pushing for certain health reforms in their think tank division
https://www.mm.dk/artikel/derfor-indgaar-tjekdet-samarbejde-med-facebook
I think the argument goes is that when someone sufficiently redneck enough says "Muslim" they really mean they don't like Somalis or such
Sort of like the assumption that when they say "Mexican" they mean the race and not the nationality
My problems with Islam have nothing to do with the ethnicity of the practicitioners, but rather then tenants of the religion it's self.
I imagine its the same for anyone cognizant enough to join this Discord
But when the left stabs a strawman, sometimes it has a voodoo effect on you
Muslims are the largest group persecuted under the banner of Islam.
Top three motivations for Terrorism each year are the Islamic Inquizition, the Islamic Crusade and in a distant third, Communism.
Another thing that's funny, like the fact that Islam persecutes gays more: under Islam you're going to have a lot more Elliot Rodger types
People who pick up a weapons because they can't get laid, only now they have the tacit support of their religion
If a Muslim finds another Muslim not being a "REAL MUSLIM!" they have to bomb the mosque.
Sometimes Buddhists get like 1 or 2 in there
Usually as part of a separatist movement or something
So in other news, Saudi Arabia and Iran have been pushing hate speech laws in western countries.
It's basically blasphemy law.
FWIW, I think the anti-islam is a bit much in many quarters.
Yep. been that way for a while.
But punishing people for criticizing Islam is a bit much.
I think as part of combatting relativism it's important to acknowledge all the contributions Islamic cultures have made to philosophy and science
Also they fought back the Mongols after China and Russia got pwned by them, which you have to admit is impressive.
(though that's where a lot started to go wrong with them, the Mamluks were more brutalistic than what came before)
@pratel It is a bit much, but people still have the right to say it.
Exactly.
And Islam is not above rebuke either.
โ Dianne Feinstein withholding Brett Kavanaugh document from fellow judiciary committee democrats โ by Ryan Grim on The Intercept
This is the article that leaked Christine Blasey Ford claims of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh that Dianne Feinstein was concealing. A mystery is who leaked this information. Many are blaming Feinstein herself, which could be the case, but who else had access to this information? According to the article, the following people had this information.
1. A person โ affiliated with Stanford University โ . This person was later found to be Ford. Itโs possible that she leaked this herself. She was in contact with Washington Post so itโs not out of question that she also contacted The Intercept. However she claimed to want anonymity, and this would contradict that.
2. That letter was given to Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Democrat who represented the area. She sent it to Feinstein. This Rep, or he staff could have been the leak.
3. Feinstein herself, or her staff. She was asked if she leaked it, she said no. The Intercept also says she didnโt. It is however unclear if her staff may have been involved.
4. The FBI. This may seem unlikely, but lately the FBI has had serious problems with leaks surrounding the Trump Russia investigation. A culture of leaking seems to exist.
http://archive.today/rZrvi
Didn't Feinstein's driver turn out to be a foreign spy?
donny
donny
yes papa
colluding russia
no papa
@Risotto yes. A Chinese spy.
Why doesn't he put links to the articles he reads?
Please put links in the video description.
@rocketWagon tag Tim in with this question in general. He may respond.
As to why, he probably figures you will google it if you want to find it
why are 6 year olds being taught to write love letters period
What if the reason Ford refused to testify in the same room as Kavanaugh is because she didn't want to absolutely cheese it?
Just a thought.
Like, what if she had no emotional attachment at all negative or otherwise to Kavanaugh, and didn't want to have to pretend otherwise.
Because love trumps hate
Bigot
@RyeNorth or the fact that she is supposed to be a sexual assault victim majorly traumatized and what kind of person like that wants to be in the same room as their "rapists"
I mean, that's a good pass off, but it's not a real expectation in the legal system.
There's also the point that she could have EASILY tried to file a report in Maryland.
There is no statute of limitations
The means by which she is attacking his life are entirely extrajudicial.
100% undoubtedly FUCK USA Today.
Didn't take long to turn him into a pedophile did it.
Right?
Next is murder I guess.
No, next would be accusing him of molesting his own daughters.
This article is taking joy in the denial of this man's joys.
This fucking Erik Brady guy probably enjoys ripping wings off of butterflies too, holy shit.
So, people resorting to Urban Dictionary for their definitions...
are being rather selective.
This exists there, too.
Was there a controversy over the slang โboofโ?
Yes, there was.
In the Kavanaugh case.
Had you heard the term before?
Someone wrote in Kavanaugh's old college yearbook that he boofed or something.
So people claimed that was evidence he was a wild party animal who stuck drugs in his bung hole
There was also a board game in the 80s called Devil's Triangle, published by Pressman.
Some car vloggers I watch from the New York area use it as a synonym for โjunkโ or โgarbageโ. So like โwe need to get rid of those boof rims on your carโ
I think it's interesting that this is where slang is going.
Like, if the Left actually didn't get triggered over Merry Christmas
they'll be assuming that the holiday condones homosexuality
(which technically... but I won't get in to that)
Don we now our gay apparel.
*gasp* it says Gay.
In relationship to Christmas!
History is bad and we need to retcon it
BTW Centrist, is your name supposed to be satire?
Yes and itโs sad anyone needs to ask
No, I ask because it's already been Poe'd
Yeah I changed it after that article lmao
Alright then.
Weโre in the best worst timeline
If we had German culture worldwide would we be in the best wurst timeline?
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
nvm. we had one shot at that, and Hitler was a Hipster vegan.
Hipstler, if you will.
Mama Merkel makes the worst wurst timeline tbh
Mama Merkel makes for a mediocore kebab timeline.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/28/17914308/kavanaugh-ford-question-dodge-hearing-chart
Anyone else see this article Vox is running where they included a chart of every question Kavanaugh apparently didn't answer?
I looked through a lot of the marked statements for both testimonies and I feel like (unsurprisingly) there are some uneven standards being applied to make things look much worse than they are
The article says the methodology was they marked questions where no answer or an answer that didnt address the qestion were marked in red
"DId you enjoy raping women like a choo choo train? Yes or no question."
Right, or the constant badgering of "do you support an FBI investigation directed at yourself"
"What do you consider too many beers"
"I don't know - whatever the chart says"
marked as not answering the question
```
MITCHELL: Did you ever tell โ did anyone ever tell you about something that happened in your presence that you didnโt remember during a time that you had been drinking?
KAVANAUGH: No, the โ the โ we drank beer, and you know, so โ so did, I think, the vast majority of โ of people our age at the time. But in any event, we drank beer, and โ and still do. So whatever, you know.
```
Marked as not answered. The first word in his response is literally the answer
Or marked as no answer when he's providing context to Mark Judge's book and saying "you'd have to ask him" whether or not referenced kavanaugh was in fact him
Alternatively you have stuff like this marked as answering the question from Fords testimony
```
MITCHELL: OK. Between the letter date, July 30th and August the 7th, did you speak with any other person about your allegations?
FORD: Could you say the dates again?
MITCHELL: Between the letter date of July 30 and August 7 โ so, while you were still in Delaware โ did you speak with any other person about your allegations?
FORD: Iโm just trying to remember what dates that.
```
I mean that's being nitpicky honestly but the uneven standard and the way each testimony is presented using this "data" is obnoxiously biased
Not to mention it ignores the types of questions being posed to each person (primarily yes/no vs. open ended)
@Bones There's also fucking Booker asking him if he wished Ford hadn't stepped forward.
What kind of question is that?
Yeah I mean, there's no real way to answer that and come out the other end unscathed
That was basically the point of the entire hearing.
Generate controversy to fuel controversy.
Thereโs some info in <#399204742846349312> about it
oh
thanks
have people touched on the copyright dance moves from fortnite? is that old news?
not just dances, *black dances*
breaking news : Someone on twitter accuses someone of racism
i like Bill Mahers take on social media outrages
"twitter is outraged? so 5 fucking people are, who cares"
and these 5 people are Trump, Putin, Merkel, Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping ? ๐
i thought Xi banned twitter?
Vee vid about yt taking superchat away from channels
/pol/ found the person apparently.
Doubt that's really the location though. Would be a bit sloppy if it were true
depends how stupid or brazen you are
we are talking about mr. "Lets Harass our Opposition"
I meant that it would be very sloppy of them to get caught by /pol/ of all places
i dunno, mainstream everything seems to have zero respect for anything 4chan
I wouldn't underestimate /pol/ because its possible that some people of the FBI, CIA, NSA and other shit work there
Well, they definitely got plants watching over 4chan, since it's become quite a powerful figure
If they do that, we are another step closer to civil war
You need to tell those Idiots that it was shit like this that led to the rise of Hitler.
I really like the "this thread/OP glows in the dark" "this thread is a psyop" memes that have developed on 4ch
Youtube can claim videos are "duplicated" if any piece of content can be found somewhere else on Youtube and demonetize an entire channel.
Superchat is where the money is now, getting ads is basically impossible for anything slightly edgy
but if the entire channel is demonetized, no more superchats AND the money made in the month is gone
Yeah
It's not sustainable, an alternative to Twitch/Youtube has to be made ventually
Maybe with crypto-backed tipping like Minds
Bitchute is nice for videos and tipping along with minds
But not enough people are ready to jump ship
Crypto is too unstable imo
I don't get crypto tbh
Even payment processers are getting political now
like with PayPal blocking InfoWars
Seems like the biggest bottleneck for alt-tech, so even with crypto as unstable as it is, it has to be looked at.
Blockchain might have to be considered for domain registration type services if those get cucked too
His most notable published book: <https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1985466.Closer_to_the_Masses>
*"Drumpf is Hitler"* says Stalin apologist.
Stalin apologist are like nanking apologist
they will deny everything
also
>gateway pundit
>calls 4chan 4pleb
uh
wew
4pleb is an archive service
lol, that WaPo column was written by a literal Stalinist?
Reddit just censored the red pill reddit thread https://youtu.be/IlPQz-r1pRU
Looks like reddit supports sjws
>plebbit
they've always been compromised, this isnt news
Reddit has been eager to delete r/The_Donald for years.
@devpav I don't think he's a Stalinist, but he appears to be pretty sympathetic to the bolsheviks.
Also from his Wordpress: <https://mlenoe.wordpress.com/2016/11/05/trump-and-dictatorship/>
The ADL could've written that entire column.
He has another book claiming that Sergey Kirov was not killed by Stalin.
I suppose it's academic freedom to make that kind of claim, but it's really surprising to me that an article written by someone like this can get published in the WaPo. The guy is an expert on the transformation of western-style "objective" media into communist agitprop.
Who is still surprised at the decline of the WaPo's credibility? It's been progressing for over 2 years.
every so often an article slips through the cracks that makes you go "wait, is there a singular good intern that's signalling for help?" and then it's swallowed by more shit
gross
That is pretty shitty @King Canuck. Do you think they will get the hint that they can't pull this shit anymore? Everyone has a camera in their pocket.
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 252/350
| Next