Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 495436126383767553
Right?
Next is murder I guess.
No, next would be accusing him of molesting his own daughters.
This article is taking joy in the denial of this man's joys.
This fucking Erik Brady guy probably enjoys ripping wings off of butterflies too, holy shit.
So, people resorting to Urban Dictionary for their definitions...
are being rather selective.
This exists there, too.
Was there a controversy over the slang “boof”?
Yes, there was.
In the Kavanaugh case.
Had you heard the term before?
Someone wrote in Kavanaugh's old college yearbook that he boofed or something.
So people claimed that was evidence he was a wild party animal who stuck drugs in his bung hole
There was also a board game in the 80s called Devil's Triangle, published by Pressman.
Some car vloggers I watch from the New York area use it as a synonym for “junk” or “garbage”. So like “we need to get rid of those boof rims on your car”
I think it's interesting that this is where slang is going.
Like, if the Left actually didn't get triggered over Merry Christmas
they'll be assuming that the holiday condones homosexuality
Don we now our gay apparel.
*gasp* it says Gay.
In relationship to Christmas!
History is bad and we need to retcon it
BTW Centrist, is your name supposed to be satire?
Yes and it’s sad anyone needs to ask
No, I ask because it's already been Poe'd
Yeah I changed it after that article lmao
Alright then.
We’re in the best worst timeline
If we had German culture worldwide would we be in the best wurst timeline?
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
nvm. we had one shot at that, and Hitler was a Hipster vegan.
Hipstler, if you will.
Mama Merkel makes the worst wurst timeline tbh
Mama Merkel makes for a mediocore kebab timeline.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/28/17914308/kavanaugh-ford-question-dodge-hearing-chart
Anyone else see this article Vox is running where they included a chart of every question Kavanaugh apparently didn't answer?
I looked through a lot of the marked statements for both testimonies and I feel like (unsurprisingly) there are some uneven standards being applied to make things look much worse than they are
The article says the methodology was they marked questions where no answer or an answer that didnt address the qestion were marked in red