The article says the methodology was they marked questions where no answer or an answer that didnt address the qestion were marked in red

"DId you enjoy raping women like a choo choo train? Yes or no question."

Right, or the constant badgering of "do you support an FBI investigation directed at yourself"

"What do you consider too many beers"
"I don't know - whatever the chart says"
marked as not answering the question

```
MITCHELL: Did you ever tell — did anyone ever tell you about something that happened in your presence that you didn’t remember during a time that you had been drinking?
KAVANAUGH: No, the — the — we drank beer, and you know, so — so did, I think, the vast majority of — of people our age at the time. But in any event, we drank beer, and — and still do. So whatever, you know.
```
Marked as not answered. The first word in his response is literally the answer

Or marked as no answer when he's providing context to Mark Judge's book and saying "you'd have to ask him" whether or not referenced kavanaugh was in fact him

Alternatively you have stuff like this marked as answering the question from Fords testimony
```
MITCHELL: OK. Between the letter date, July 30th and August the 7th, did you speak with any other person about your allegations?
FORD: Could you say the dates again?
MITCHELL: Between the letter date of July 30 and August 7 — so, while you were still in Delaware — did you speak with any other person about your allegations?
FORD: I’m just trying to remember what dates that.
```

I mean that's being nitpicky honestly but the uneven standard and the way each testimony is presented using this "data" is obnoxiously biased

Not to mention it ignores the types of questions being posed to each person (primarily yes/no vs. open ended)

@Bones There's also fucking Booker asking him if he wished Ford hadn't stepped forward.

What kind of question is that?

Yeah I mean, there's no real way to answer that and come out the other end unscathed

That was basically the point of the entire hearing.

Generate controversy to fuel controversy.

https://metro.co.uk/2018/09/26/student-pours-bleach-and-water-on-mens-crotches-to-stop-them-manspreading-7979562/

There’s some info in <#399204742846349312> about it

oh

thanks

have people touched on the copyright dance moves from fortnite? is that old news?

https://twitter.com/mannyfidel/status/1045390141458657281

not just dances, *black dances*

breaking news : Someone on twitter accuses someone of racism

i like Bill Mahers take on social media outrages

"twitter is outraged? so 5 fucking people are, who cares"

and these 5 people are Trump, Putin, Merkel, Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping ? 😉

i thought Xi banned twitter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgupOPuZbUI

Vee vid about yt taking superchat away from channels

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-ip-address-of-person-who-doxxed-gop-senators-points-to-maxine-waters-office/

/pol/ found the person apparently.

Doubt that's really the location though. Would be a bit sloppy if it were true

depends how stupid or brazen you are

we are talking about mr. "Lets Harass our Opposition"

I meant that it would be very sloppy of them to get caught by /pol/ of all places

i dunno, mainstream everything seems to have zero respect for anything 4chan

I wouldn't underestimate /pol/ because its possible that some people of the FBI, CIA, NSA and other shit work there

Well, they definitely got plants watching over 4chan, since it's become quite a powerful figure

If they do that, we are another step closer to civil war

You need to tell those Idiots that it was shit like this that led to the rise of Hitler.

Has @Timcast talked on this? https://longzijun.wordpress.com/2018/06/15/youtube-monetization-and-the-issue-of-duplication/

I really like the "this thread/OP glows in the dark" "this thread is a psyop" memes that have developed on 4ch