newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 83/874
| Next
the cycle is getting shorter and shorter (especially for the left)
and more extreme
THE CYCLE
the liberalists
Menstrual?
Pendulum of memes
well what will happen is it will culminate into 2 big groups, the biggest wanting to remain big so they work on containing the smaller group
which will cause people to split off to join the other group
and then they are in charge and remember the bad containing so they decide to break it free again so everyone can have their say
just like conservative right 50 years ago turning to the bigger left now, and slowly people see its bad and they want freedom again (like voting Trump etc)
it will sort itself out in due time
memes are just a catalyst
shows how stupid authority figures are for getting upset over them, weakening their status towards the internet folk
but bed time for me, it was fun discussing and arguing, disagreeing and agreeing, we should do it again sometime
cheerios
memes are a catalyst for our political direction, culture clashes, etc
thats pretty amazing and fucking scary all at once
So, you're saying that memes move politics? <:Kappa:327142715592540171>
memes condense an entire idea into a quickly consumable artifact
simply a modern extension of "a picture is worth a thousand words"
Yeah.
tim just went live a few secs ago
WHAT THE FUCK
I guess they consider dying a cure for autism?
Which is sad considering autism isnโt a disease, you canโt cure it.
We can't cure it with the tech available to us right now, but we might be able to in the future.
I think it will eventually be treatable.
Thereโs nothing to cure though. Autism isnโt a sickness, itโs a disorder that effects state of mind.
As someone that has autism: no, fuck you. It absolutely is a disease (disorder is a subset there of) and there absolutely is something to cure.
Sure in the future you might be able to temporarily readjust their state of mind, but the default will always be the same
It is a neurological development disorder.
It's a mental condition just like any other.
And eventually treatable, maybe even cured.
Considering no mental condition in existence has ever been cured
From what I understand about autism, it would be something that probably has to be treated in utero
We do not know what the future might bring.
Treatable sure, but thereโs a major difference between take this drug once and youโre good to go vs take this medication once a day every day
Of course.
Assuming that we'll never develop some form of medical tech capable of doing things we can't even imagine now is absurd.
holy heck hes live
Go explain an MRI to a doctor in the US civil war.
I sincerely doubt medicine will ever evolve to the point where humans have learned how to rewire a human brain
We're getting close to being able to stop Alzheimer's from spreading
It's not rewiring a brain, but it's the closest we've gotten to date
because the trials required to do so will almost assuredly be considered torture
being a furry is a mental illness
#facts
And unless we get the second coming of Nazi doctors who donโt give a shit about their patients o donโt see us ever getting there
then there is no point in classifing things as a mental illness
I thought the brain rewires the brain
nothing rewires anything
weights just change
I don't think we have to go straight to 'Nazi doctors' in order to advance medical science.
Oh wait, sorry, forgot, that's not real science. <:Kappa:327142715592540171>
How else would you propose doctors experiment on live human brains in order to change the way they perceive the world in a way that wouldnโt be considered torture?
Experiment on non human brains first
Volunteers second
@Deller If we ever get to the point where we can keep a brain alive in a jar, I'm sure somebody will donate their brain for science
It's easy to say 'we'll never', until someone does.
Except you canโt torture volunteers? You can thank shit like the Stanford Prison Experiments for that
Even if we can keep a brain alive in a jar, how do we know how that brain currently perceives the world? Hell, how would it even perceive the world?
There is a reason there is a series of animal trials and other rules before moving onto humans. The idea being to work out the kinks on animals before human trails, decreasing the chance it will end poorly
There are significant and extensive clinical trial research protocols for any medication, what the fuck makes you think those will not be developed for medication that is actively able to modify neurological connections? This reeks of scaremongering, anti-scientific, Luddism.
Iโm fairly certain it takes more than medication to rewire the way a human brain perceives the world
Because just taking medication is going to be more treatment, less cure
And they will probably be much more different than surgery.
They would be something that probably entirely new
Although could still come in pill form
Eh, I wouldn't go that far, but you brought up a good example earlier with the MRI machine. Yeah, it's hard to imagine us doing a lot about mental conditions right now, today, without our current level of understanding and technology, but to say that 'we will never reach that point' is just cynnical. Again, try explaining what an MRI even is to a victorian-era physician, much less how it actually works.
All cures for anything we have today were once believed to be impossible.
And the methods of discovering many cures are largely considered barbaric by todayโs standards & would never fly in the scientific community today
A lot of our knowledge of the brain came as a result of lobotomies. Great for research, less great for the patients.
We are developing ways to grow organs without a host. Ever increasing computation power allow for ever better simulation and design work. While it might be true these rules and ideas slow research, it does not stop it
For your example, rather than lobotomizing people, we need to wait for natural brain damage. Well, if too call crashing a car going 100 as natural that is
That's besides the point that there is always types who will chase after rather unethical science.
But at what point do governments step in & start extending these grown test subjects human rights? Hell Sophia the robot AI was just given Saudi Arabian citizenship.
Then we have lost the culture war and a the only future advancement for humanity is to nuke all the world.
When science is made illegal, then humans are no longer allowed to think
If Iโve learned anything itโs the fact that the American government shits all over science every chance it gets
More reason to fight for smaller government
That I agree with
With luck smart people will get us to mars and we can leave the US behind and just offer people free trips to mars as compensation for being a test subject.
#lifegoals
Hopefully once we start colonizing other planets we tell the governments of Earth to fuck off, but Iโd be willing to bet even on Mars weโll have shit like Martian America or Martian Russia
I mean, eventually
But at least there is a chance of getting enough people at the beginning to tell the Earth governments to fuck off
No matter where we go, no matter where we colonize in the galaxy, we are always going to have countries like Russia and America, and even North Korea
the extremely free all the way down to the extremely controlled. no matter how far we advance in tech, medicine, anything really, opinion will always be different when it comes to each individual person.
The world will chance, human nature will not. At least, not significantly. I do not believe we have changed much since the times of the romans.
I agree lol, we have changed a lot, I was talking just opinion in general, because even back then, opinions on a lot were different too.
so long and thanks for all the warrants
SHOULD WE HAVE AN INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS? - Tim Pool
Play freebird
Shouldnt the amendments already apply to it?
if you're operating your own radio
and following the FCC regs
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 83/874
| Next