its following statistics

i mean you are using the scientific method to collect good data

you're using experiments to collect the data

experiments being methods of collecting your data

yep, good data and good experimentation lays credit to the correllation, no one will want to say its 100% truth, but can be confident nonetheless, thats good science

as in selection strategies and in the case of something fuzzy, a classification algorithm

@pukeblood i think we should define "good science" as something that has an actual use in society that offsets it's cost

well its hard to say if something is good if its, say, new

supporting hypothesis are needed to make a theorem in any science

nah, he means a reliable conclusion when he says "good science" he doesn't mean how much it matters to society

like traffic studies that reduce road deaths by 1% is still going to be good

oh yeah nah I dont mean societal benefits

but instead that its drawn from reliable experiments and data to draw an accurate conclusion

implementation of good science will probably, *usually*, result in good benefits

yeah but like

i can prove my brainfuck theories for decades and decades and waste countless hours of other people's time

so can anime

thats not a problem

if its scientifically proven, its still good

the issue is also my hypothesis can be so loose that it would always be a hit

then its a bad hypothesis 😛

youd get called on your shit immediately

like if someone makes a study they can make it "good science" by just making the hypothesis too loose

I mean, a loose hypothesis gives you loose results

loose hypotheses are thought up by many a "woke" person

lul

like when you do shrooms and look at space and go "bruh what if like, hold on"

"what if the stars are watching"

*hits blunt* is it called Sand because its between Sea and Land?

reminds me of another thing to bitch about

creationists saying we cant prove evolution is real because we don't have a time machine

but what about the Ohare airport ufo of 2007

gotta be timetravellers and/or underground aliens

bitch, we've proven evolution,

we've managed to cultivate bacteria that break down synthetics, synthetics didn't exist 200 years ago

😛

and i don't mean bitch as an attack, i meant it like hip-hop slang

BBC showed theres only one place bacteria wont live

yeah but that's micro evolution

uranus, HAAAA

at the bottom of the ocean theres a salt ocean

(playing devil's advocate)

you can't make a bacteria grow legs

its called twitch actually

oh and there are gaps in fossils that claim to prove evolution

yes, but it still proves evolution, to declare it as "you can just spout legs" is just as useless an argument as "okay, make god appear and do a silly dance"

they were probably just birth defects

and they cherry picked the fossils to prove the scientist narritive

and you can't prove god doesn't exist

checkmate, atheists

yes but the creationists are just like the modern progressive left

despite evidence to the contrary they'll still push their narrative forward

fossils were placed there by satan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RngtRPMinG8
anyone interested in the brine pool of death

Satan's a cool dude, what's wrong with that?

satan warshippers are bringing negative energy into our world and causing corruption and death

also, we covered that, god can't exist because its a logical paradox

If he exists, how did he came to be, and then what created him
if he just "always was" why is that a more sound theory than an existance in which our universe would come to be is one

they all just want to cull humanity again

god existing disproves himself

*tips fedora*

I mean hindus dont believe in that paradox god

they meditate until their souls become new vessels to travel space with

although i find that to be a more working belief,

most hindus are from India in which 50% of the population can't afford a toilet and result to pooping in the street, so theres that 😛

probably why they want to live in their souls instead

my point exactly

they got the himalayas tho

true, but thats filled with the skeletons of "hold my beer" western mountain climbers

I find meditating on a skeleton mountain to be pretty good for soul cultivation

it will atleast guarantee company when you finally do experience nirvana

I want to climb those mountains and put "hold my beer" signs on all the skeletons now.

just suggest it to a person who you know will say "hold my beer" and try it

all you gotta do is staple a "hold my beer" sign to his back before he leaves

if astral beings exist, how come they dont have instagram accounts?

prolly worried about being yelled at by astral justice warriors saying they're commiting astral appropriation

see this is why freedom of speech is important, broadly ripping on random groups of people is fun 😛

The far left is a product of MSM taking the internet too seriously.

I wish i could pinpoint when normies first looked inside the internet and went *oh no, this cant be*

And tumblr existing

you'd think they'd know better

internet messages are pretty much like how grafitti used to be like

bitch its been like that since before I was 8

restriction of speech is stupid, the words of the extremists aren't too dangerous

moderates can be more powerful and have a larger impact

for example, Aussie over here hasn't threatened violence against anyone

they're left extremists, they need to control language like any extremist

well, letting extremists voice their views is good

if a person starts saying "of the 20 people in this room, i'll kill 17 when i get into power"

the 19 people in the room then know to never have him get to power

MSM saw the war between 4chan and Tumblr and then figured that represented how the world was.

it technically is, it was a meme war between the very people in a society

screw the couple of million of soldiers that fight every now and then

internet is a battle between anyone with a voice

also, left extremists need censoring because if theres no one to say how stupid a persons views are, then those that have no view are bound by that stupid view instead of finding a better sensible alternative

all of the extremists in the west will just dissolve if social media stops producing echo chambers

I dont think anyone should be censored... view points will fall apart when put up under real scruntity..

well echo chambers are social media in working

since you can block any opinion you don't like, and can quickly associate with those you do

BAM... echo chamber

the issue is thye only have the observations of those who they like to engage with (not nessicarily people with their political opinion)

So, blow up Facebook. Hold on, let me start up fight club and put on my guy fawks mask

nah, no need for that extreme

But I could claim it for the name of Islam and watch everything really go to shit

still blows my mind that politicians bow down to loud people on twitter

at some point, everyone on social media will be so divided into small groups that fully agree, that they realise they have 0 impact cuz they're too divided, and they'll start forming bigger "we agree on some issues" again

until it boils down into a bigger group of yelling

forming groups to advocate for something is completely fine

The natural flow of things

you need to do that to get messages across to the powerful

otherwise it would just be noise

they die, some new problem emerges, many agree, the point gets across, repeat