newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 113/874
| Next
(I apologize; English is not my first language.)
recreational gun ownership is the same as "hunter" for me... basically the same regulations for both
You're moving goal posts...
not really
And @Miss Direction IIRC it's an EU human right to have access to the internet
Why?
I just think it's more complicated than that, especially in the United States. There are plenty of areas in the US where it is not uncommon to be miles away from the nearest telephone pole, much less being within a reasonable response time to a police station or sheriff's office.
Because most north/west EU countries have basically fully digitized their government communication
hunter/sportsschiessen: heavily regulated where you are allowed to use your guns, what guns you can use and even how you can use your guns.
And in a lot of the major cities, there *is* very strict gun control, if not outright bans.
I depart. Good luck, all.
Yes, but you at first just said hunter. When I pointed out that isn't true, you suddenly changed that to hunter 'also means recreational shooting'
to me hunting is recreational shooting
but you are right that there IS a destinction in the law
Here is a problem, in the us, with at least some instances. There are several laws already in place that are not enforced as well as the should be. Yet the solution proposed is to add more to it? In Florida, it seems literally everyone knew this was a very real possibility with this kid
The FBI even knew but couldn't get him on anything. Banning assault weapons doesn't really fix it. Or more accurately is like having a hammer and treating everything like a nail. Why ban all cars, for example, when you knew a person was very likely going to use a car to commit a terror act. Why not find where they should have been able get them, and add a small piece of legislation there, rather than punish all the law abiding companies and citizens for the action of a minority.
why should anyone give a sliver of their rights up to stopgap something that may or may not do anything long term?
In the grand scheme of things, you cannot reasonably stop people who lose their shit from doing anything.
You ban guns and they run around with cars or swords or make explosives
we cannot un-learn these things
NICS should have a bit more of a handle on things
but in this shooter's case; really I'm not sure that the feds should have been able to do anything
maybe the teachers could have actually been armed?
As much as I might dislike that kids were shot and killed; it's honestly probably not possible to actually predict and 100% stop nutjobs like this
Arming teachers and having armed security is a very logical thing to do.
short of infringing rights significantly
Well, I'm not suggesting arming them per-se, but allowing them to do so would be nice
Giving them the ability to be armed yes.
Donโt have to force them.
In that case, you're removing at least one penal code from the state
so I has no issue
It sounds fucked up to say, but I am more OK with random spurious lunatics losing it than I am with giving up the rights enumerated in the constitution of the US
I'd of course, rather they be stopped
but I don't want to go down the thoughtcrime path
Where I live we have security guards at all schools, some teachers have personal weapons, and in general lots of people walk around with military grade weapons (which are allowed in schools). Canโt recall ever having a school shooting so guns arenโt the problem.
Yeah, there are like a handful of states/municipalities that allow it afaik
Here in the social justice capital of the united states however, that's a big nono
Frisco?
The problem with armed security is the cost
And that in public schools it would be taxpayers money
Better to spend it on security than stupid social programs.
Bray areayylmao only
not SF
(Thankfully)
Just cut wasteful expenses and start funding security (also creates new jobs).
actually most campuses already have security
But really, I think one gaurd and only the main entrance unlocked to the outside might have helped. If there was a button that trigger an internal lockdown and the procedure of "if you see a person with a fucking long gun, press button first ask questions later", it might have helped some
they just aren't armed at all
Security might as well not be security if they arenโt armed.
red alert button might be good but
I dunno how effective it'll be
Everyone armed to the teeth
students, teachers
janitors
Well, it's better than letting a dude pull a fire alarm and wait for his victims to come running
the principal with a deagle brand deagle
A nun that happened to be there
I still question how a dude with a long gun gets into a school unnoticed
Can take it apart and put it into a bag.
Then assemble in the bathroom or something.
Did he actually have a standard non-sbr upper?
I have not seen dick pix
Because he could have just bought a 11.4 or 10" upper and illegally slapped it on his rifle lower
it's not like those components are restricted
"Save the Dutch referendum!"
https://www.democracy-international.org/meer-democratie-netherlands-sue-minister-over-abolition-dutch-referendum
"Dutch Intelligence and Security Services Act referendum 2018"
(Tapping Law to give General Intelligence and Security Service sweeping surveillance powers)
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Dutch_Intelligence_and_Security_Services_Act_referendum,_2018
"Although a referendum will be held, the government has indicated it plans for the law to nevertheless to go into effect on 1 May 2018."
Yeah, they basically openly stated that the result of the referendum doesn't matter, they'll ignore any 'no' result.
Yeah, they already know the majority of people are against this. They know the people will vote "incorrectly".
This law will allow people's devices to be hacked, but also those of friends, relatives, family etc.
They will also be allowed to tap ALL internet traffic, request information from any company or governmental databases and exchange this info with other secret services.
Basically, it's about mass surveillance.
Ooof
Poll: 63% of UK business leaders support Brexit
The real Womenโs March: Protests against migrant violence and Islamisation in Berlin
Dutch parliament recognises Armenian genocide, minister to attend commemoration
EU: Hungarian town canโt be European Capital of Culture because there are โtoo many happy white peopleโ
am I going crazy or was there a new Tim Pool video on youtube that is now not available anymore?
He probably accidentally uploaded to public
oh lol
Itโs the video from yesterday I think.
It's 10 minutes short of his regular release time
i thought i did see something with 4chan
didnt watch it immediately tho and now its gone
YouTube removed it and gave him a strike for "harassment."
wow srsly?
thx for the alternative upload link
if things get crazy at the Damore event Tim will not be able to do a spontaneous live stream on his main channel
Does tim ever actually use discord
Iโve been in here since day one and Iโve only seen him active once
I've seen him a few times
But barely.
You're welcome. Glad there's another way to view the video.
Hes a busy man. But he did come in here occasionally.
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 113/874
| Next