Left politics aren't feminine. They're necessary if a woman doesn't have a man, because she then needs the state to take care of her.

That’s not the only solution, it’s just the most extreme one. @Ald

You can think whatever you want about ethnostates, but things are likely going to be fixed incrementally.

One might say most extreme, but also could say ideal

I hear you

New podcast is pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llVFl7f6XcQ

I don’t really think it’s that extreme, there are still unclaimed areas you could start one without displacing anyone.

I just think idealism shouldn't be lost in the to and fro of politics

Everyone give a "like" and comment

@missliterallywho I agree with you completely. I you look back to the Rightist politics in Europe and U.S. in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the women were the most fanatical gatekeepers of all. The big exception was prohibition which as the early manifestation of Leftist feminism. What women like are WINNERS. As we reclaim our patrimony, the ladies will get on board as super-valuable allies.

@missliterallywho I would say that leftist politics are more infantile than feminine. They tend to be pretty childish and naive at best.

And you enter into LARP territory once you start talking about carving up the US or founding an ethnostate on Mars—not that you personally were.

There’s nothing wrong with entertaining extravagant visions for the future, but our messaging needs to be relatable and strategic.

@Virgil yes, naive in that they ignore the very laws of nature <:usinnoodle:420778112226164736>

@Virgil Nice point. But it's obvious that the Left gains leverage through appeals to irrational emotion. Typical (((con man))) tactices.

There's of course a difference between musing among ourselves and what is put into the wider world. Although due to several reasons there's always a chance the former can become the latter.

When discussing specific policies we support, we should publicly express support for achievable things in the short term, while keeping the rest of our (peaceful, non-violent) intentions concealed.

You don’t have to go to mars or LARP.You would just need to be able to survive in a hostile desert. Which is technically possible if people had the will.

Real talk though, any area in the US that is now ~90% white *is* essentially an ethnostate

freedom isn't inherited at birth its fought for, that's why we always have to stand our ground, be smart and educate others on why to vote for freedom and how the MSM is manipulating them, in a smart politically correct peaceful way. its hard times for freedom of speech but cannot ever give it up. sorry for late reply my roommate spilled my coffee >: (

by being smart and educating people is how to show them the way

No ethnostate on Mars 😭

Yeah, well, the world is majority nonWhte both in territory and demographics. We MUST reclaim the White patrimony that existed a hundred years ago. That is not to much to insist upon. The feelings of our dusky brethren should be ignored as a minor irritation.

Small stated these days can’t exist outside of the context of empires: NATO, Russia, etc.

A White ethnostate would get dominated without the support of larger nations.

The system won’t just let you exit.

Jumping in late, but my personal philosophy to our situation is grounded in incrementalism. We found ourselves in this mess step, by baby step - and that's how we're going to pull ourselves out.

Be smarter, more patient, more cunning and disciplined than our foes.

@Reinhard Wolff is right. There are many ethnocentric communities in Russia. Like they have a Jewish community in the Siberia, that is heavily populated by Jews. It's basically an ethnostate.

Empires unravel. We're seeing that in our own era. The White American ethnostate should be the entirety of what is now the U.S.

The left have won by coupling an idealistic vanguard with hard headed politics, incrementally yes but never stepping away from the vanguard, at worst not commenting

An ethnostate is an ideal, it gives a sense of direction to what would be better or worse, more in that direction is better

I don’t know, it would seem really messed up for a country to attack a smaller nation outside its borders in the middle of a desert.

Sure, there’s no harm talking about it

My responses were more geared toward’s IE public positions

I'm telling you all. We need to go back to the attitudes and the taste for action that characterized our ancestors 100 years ago. They were right. They were in touch with a harsh, but undeniable reality.

We can let the bloggers and podcasters carve out an imaginary ethnostate

As baby steps go, we are quickly headed towards "draw[ing] the line at Steve King and everyone to the left of him is a f--ing traitor to the country" <:whitepill:439924104406106113> <:whitepill:439924104406106113> <:whitepill:439924104406106113>

Yea obviously IE is not publicly planting ethnostates a or even privately, but we can dream.

I’m motivated by more achievable goals, but to each his own.

The moment we halt and then reverse demographic decline we will be unstoppable