Message from @Wood-Ape - OK/MN
Discord ID: 516021020264497172
The JQ is unavoidable. It will find you if you look for the truth.
The JQ is indeed unavoidable and a red pill. It’s not the only red pill ffs.
My dad buys HBD & IQ and wants mass deportations. He hates left wing globalists but refuses to admit Iraq war (much at Israel's behest) was a mistake. Might show him Allsup's vidya on Shapiro.
Perhaps. Probably bad to shove it into folks faces.
There are truths but I think the term 'redpill' is deluded and should be used to refer to the most substantial and central truth. I would concider the wim hof method a truth, but not a redpill.
JQ needs to be done gradually
if you’re committed to introducing someone to the JQ, 1) be careful and 2) just send examples without mentioning it overtly.
The “funding for Israel vs funding for (insert American domestic issue)” approach is good
But I am in no rush
You cant force red pills on people. Point them in a direction. People have to red pill themselves.
Yeah never rush things
@Mr. Huxley - OH Boomers grew up in the post war era. Their parents fought in ww2. Anything related to the jq is going to look like nazism to them, which makes it a tough sell.
Best not to say anything.
Anti-globalism is good enough for us to achieve our aims, honestly.
You don't need to talk about Jews you only need to reference the global elite and the banking cartel.
Jews have a political shield and its not worth engaging with that dialectic.
I think impatience is a major factor of nebulous negativity called "sperg"
Slow and steady
@Mr. Huxley - OH About encouraging our members to "name the Jew" to their parents and family, dude.
You definitely need to name them eventually. You can’t only refer to them as the elite forever. You also can’t just start with “JEWSSSSSS”
@Lucas Anglocius What about the pharmaceutical companies who pay doctors to over-prescribe opium? What about the millitary industrial complex? f35 come to mind, anyone?
True. It is a delicate procedure. Clumsy execution can ruin things.
The JQ has to he approached carefully. There's too much other stuff associated with it.
Who is more effective? Tucker or Patrick Little? Both hate the same things, but without naming the Jew.
Tucker hating the jew seems a leap.
My father told me WWI was caused by Jewish bankers when I was very young.
Ignorant of how the rest of society saw that, I mentioned it casually in elementary school to a teacher. I learned a good lesson that day.
It is quite a careful subject and can be construed as crazy, unhinged and unjustified but I would like to think that anyone who wants to tell anyone about anything as a matter of fact has thoroughly researched the subject before trying to inform people about it.
Imagine unironically saying "the Jew" in 2018
Tucker hates the ends that the Jews and other internationalists create. He does not explicitly hate Jews with as much spergy and frankly unhelpful passion as PLittle does.
Oh quite awkward, though less than it would have been were I older and knew the full implications of that statement and how I’d be judged.
@Mr. Huxley - OH the point is to attack certain specific entities not say a small group are puppet masters of all the worlds problems.
Amazing the social power Jews have gained since ww2
@Alexander Pechorin That's pretty wild. Imagine what the old man had to dig through to find what is now readily available online.
They've always had disproportionate social power. This isn't new or a recent development.
Talking about Jewish influence can be productive if done correctly and in the right context. Pointing out that white over-representation is an example of white privilege, but Jewish over-representation isn't an example of Jewish privilege is a useful and easily defensible talking point.
"Well, jews are white"
@Lucas Anglocius Personally I like to start with this video of a homeless man.
A good seed to plant in civnat's minds is to point out the majority of the people involved in communism historically were jewish people (say jewish people, not just jews..)