So wait... are you seriously telling me that you believe that two document experts cannot disagree as to the authenticity of a signature?
Because I can assure you it happens in courts every day in the US.
She always sounded sleepy but she really hammed up the rudeness in the hearing. Maybe that’s her all energized coffee or cocaine . She also said she worked for 24 hours straight @MatiLuc
Hi guys the court cases at state level in state courts is there somw kind of national court cases site for the casse filing and doucments and Exhibits and affidavits. I have access the federal court public filing system called PACER vier courtlistener website witch posts only federal cases not state or county cases thanks for your help.
Ok, more realistic. But... that does not change the fact that you are asking a court to put a paid expert in a position to examine hundreds of thousands of ballots and decide if we keep them or not.
I would suggest that it makes more sense that if there are any ballots than can justifiable be challenged contact the voter.
You say that is an unlawful cure.
My response is that your expert is spoiling a ballot and he should not be a part of that process per the statute.
But before we ever get to any expert looking at the first ballot you have to establish a reason more than a suspicion.
@Alondraz how were they able to this because Guliani team are not a able to investigate this machines .. they dont have a court orders.
Probably some random machine they bought and hack
No, initially I'm asking that a sample occur to determine the rate at which they would be rejected, and then if it's significant, they should continue.
What are you even talking about? The Supreme Court is not a fact finding court. They cannot adjudicate fraud. They simple reverse or uphold the rulings of lower courts.
Ok... again more reasonable buy why?
And I am not trying to be difficult. We the presumption has to be that the ballots are proper. So there has to be something to overcome that presumption.
@RobertGrulerEsq Great show today - I agree: Good Point We are not close to civil war nor marshal law and I understand the frustration of the angry. I am frustrated too.I am so looking forward to the face diaper burning party :goodvibes: That day WILL come 👍
That cant happen, Constitutional issues. But no it wouldn't stop anything... why would the same exact claims not arise? Hell Trump still thinks he won the popular vote in 2016
Auditing the signatures is provisioned for in the GA law. Spoiling them on the basis of signatures is also provisioned for in law. If a judge can be persuaded by his own appointed expert to do so, then he has the proper ability to remedy that.
Right, they will confirm the adjudication of the lower court in each battleground state where there was FRAUD. Why do you think there called Battle Ground states?
