@PrivateEye, you just advanced to level 7!

if they get 200,000 ballots in the mail they have the total number and then if you are counting them and 50,000 ballots just show up in "briefcases" they counted 250,000 total

Seriously? This is what you have to offer?

thats how they knew Detroit was off 400 votes

You people act like signature analysis hasn't been a part of every legal tradition since the founding of this country.

and before then.

Well according to that Melissa chick.... if what she said happened actually happened they would have over 200,000 extra votes in one county (not the state)

thats why when Mellissa Carone said the poll books are 100k votes different than the count! and the GOP senator said how do you figure it matches?

No. But for every document expert that you can find to say that the signature doesn't match I can find one that says they do match

Its subjective

@DrSammyD understand what I'm saying if some signatures don't look like the original there could be valid reasons for that ... NOW if you found whole batches of signatures of supposedly different people that all looked the same, like one person that signed for a bunch of people then you may have something there

No you can't

She was drunk or some drugs... because she didn't sounded and looked like that in a previous hearing

Signature experts are well established within almost every legal jurisdiction.

Supreme Court will decide. They will adjudicate the fraud. Voter integrity will preserve the Republic.

So wait... are you seriously telling me that you believe that two document experts cannot disagree as to the authenticity of a signature?
Because I can assure you it happens in courts every day in the US.

No, I'm saying you won't find that they disagree on EVERY ballot.

She always sounded sleepy but she really hammed up the rudeness in the hearing. Maybe that’s her all energized coffee or cocaine . She also said she worked for 24 hours straight @MatiLuc

if the SCOTUS isnt picking up Giuliani or Powells what is the SCOTUS going to pick up that applies to several swing states in one go

@james j yes 100%..

They'll agree on the vast majority

Georgia statutes require the two signatures match. Easy

Hi guys the court cases at state level in state courts is there somw kind of national court cases site for the casse filing and doucments and Exhibits and affidavits. I have access the federal court public filing system called PACER vier courtlistener website witch posts only federal cases not state or county cases thanks for your help.

https://en-volve.com/2020/12/03/private-investigation-by-non-partisan-group-reveals-equipment-in-michigan-deliberately-set-to-shift-votes-from-trump-to-biden/

mod can you please link me the ec study please thanks. that he talked about on the show tonight.

Listen to professor Eastman

Ok, more realistic. But... that does not change the fact that you are asking a court to put a paid expert in a position to examine hundreds of thousands of ballots and decide if we keep them or not.

I would suggest that it makes more sense that if there are any ballots than can justifiable be challenged contact the voter.

You say that is an unlawful cure.

My response is that your expert is spoiling a ballot and he should not be a part of that process per the statute.

But before we ever get to any expert looking at the first ballot you have to establish a reason more than a suspicion.

@Alondraz how were they able to this because Guliani team are not a able to investigate this machines .. they dont have a court orders.
Probably some random machine they bought and hack

I dont see this turning around unless the state legislatures just grab electors then voting is out its just take anything 😄

No, initially I'm asking that a sample occur to determine the rate at which they would be rejected, and then if it's significant, they should continue.

Very cool... Thanks.

What happens if Biden wins and it’s found out that there was widespread errors/fraud and Trump should’ve won, say in a year?

Don't know you'll have to research it. Was just sent to me

What are you even talking about? The Supreme Court is not a fact finding court. They cannot adjudicate fraud. They simple reverse or uphold the rulings of lower courts.

And so far fraud has not even been pled

Trump card is being played now, not a year from now.

If Trump concedes, the only thing that appears to be available is impeachment.

So if Trump thinks kemp is in on the fraud he had to pretend to be one of his biggest fans

3d chess

Ok... again more reasonable buy why?
And I am not trying to be difficult. We the presumption has to be that the ballots are proper. So there has to be something to overcome that presumption.

Trump won with the same Dominion machines in 2016.. why is he crying now.