Message from @Watching the Watchers
Discord ID: 784251242310139975
But a court is not going to order anything at all until they can establish a real issue
That would be illegally curing the ballots
Judge couldn't order that. Unconstitutional
yeah the GOP told the GA sec of state check out this weird stuff. he sent people in they got the surveilliance video and interviewed workers and shared his findings. that was when Trump said and Kemp are in on the fraud
https://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-news/georgia-opens-2-investigations-into-fultons-elections-operations/EVCBN4ZJTZELPDHMH63POL3RKQ/
And see Trump wants to get his experts to look at the signatures and if they dont match in their opinion then they get tossed
I see that argument... but its not curing anything unless the ballot is spoiled
How do you spoil the ballot?
No, they'll have their experts identify the ballots they want to challenge, and then the judge would appoint a 3rd party to confirm.
Some dude thinks the signatures are not a match?
“Trump experts” being objective and not looking for any excuse to dismiss signatures for Biden votes ha
hey guys how we doing
That is ridiculous
The Trump card is being pulled.
They don't just get to pick which ones... they need to show a problem
The trump card is just flipping the table over and saying the game was rigged
they have ballot count totals before they count those ballots if a bunch magically appeared it would have showed up this is the Mellissa argument
@Doc - ah -- no - don't think so - Lol 😀 👍
A Trump Team hired expert is not a part of the process... Those experts have no authority to spoil ballots
well the signature verification portion is pretty subjective and so just because historically there was a higher rejection rate doesn't mean that rejection rate is the correct rate ... so if you're a judge are you going to want to possibly disenfranchise voters based on subjective re-analysis?
It was rigged. Where is my vote? Frankfurt,,China?
if they get 200,000 ballots in the mail they have the total number and then if you are counting them and 50,000 ballots just show up in "briefcases" they counted 250,000 total
Seriously? This is what you have to offer?
thats how they knew Detroit was off 400 votes
You people act like signature analysis hasn't been a part of every legal tradition since the founding of this country.
and before then.
Well according to that Melissa chick.... if what she said happened actually happened they would have over 200,000 extra votes in one county (not the state)
thats why when Mellissa Carone said the poll books are 100k votes different than the count! and the GOP senator said how do you figure it matches?
No. But for every document expert that you can find to say that the signature doesn't match I can find one that says they do match
Its subjective
@DrSammyD understand what I'm saying if some signatures don't look like the original there could be valid reasons for that ... NOW if you found whole batches of signatures of supposedly different people that all looked the same, like one person that signed for a bunch of people then you may have something there
No you can't
She was drunk or some drugs... because she didn't sounded and looked like that in a previous hearing
Signature experts are well established within almost every legal jurisdiction.
Supreme Court will decide. They will adjudicate the fraud. Voter integrity will preserve the Republic.
So wait... are you seriously telling me that you believe that two document experts cannot disagree as to the authenticity of a signature?
Because I can assure you it happens in courts every day in the US.
No, I'm saying you won't find that they disagree on EVERY ballot.
She always sounded sleepy but she really hammed up the rudeness in the hearing. Maybe that’s her all energized coffee or cocaine . She also said she worked for 24 hours straight @MatiLuc
if the SCOTUS isnt picking up Giuliani or Powells what is the SCOTUS going to pick up that applies to several swing states in one go
They'll agree on the vast majority