(((Donald trump)))

(((Ivanka)))

Oy vey @Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸

Very antisemetic of you

(((Donald Trumps Gran-Children)))

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-42250399

Do we fear the Palestians?

Hahhahahhaha

Fuck em

This might actually be <:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>

next step we re-Unify Korea

Tu-pac brother I know you tried to get peace in the Middle-East by writing poems but we have a real chance now.

Shine upon us so California can Party again

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXvBjCO19QY

Kek

http://www.dailywire.com/news/24390/democrats-call-al-franken-resign-flashback-three-james-barrett

Huh

It’s almost like they have cognitive dissonance

They knew!

Oy vey

"some sort of an MMA thing"

Dude sounds very knowledgeable.

Very intellectual.

Picking fight on a manlet like Shapiro

https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/7i5oyw/london_mayor_sadiq_khan_asked_by_reporter_how_it/

That's like asking Ted Cruz if he's Canadian

He's obviously Cuban

I mean Texan

Kek

Shooter is white
> racism is taking over America ban all guns

Shooter is not white
> it's fine, no big deal

>Shooter is Islamic
> so quiet you can hear blood pumping

Wrong.

Shooter is Muslim
> won't somebody please think of the Muslims, they're the real victims here.

But but

THE CRUSADESSSSSSSS

muh crusades

"Jihad means peacefully converting infidels to Islam"

Islam most feminist religion, wokest counter-culture of 2017 yolo

Relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ioDYIlFYIQ

"Islamic Reliel USA" I can barely contain my laughter

kek

>islam
>feminism

wait

feminism loves islam

duh

JBP's theory on that is that feminists lack a strong male figure of dominance in their lives since they're surrounded by betas and omegas, and Islam is that dominant force they desire

At least he's brought it up that way before

^

Kek

It seems plausible

They want what they don’t have and what they don’t have is strong men

Nah, he quite clearly said, the alliance with Islam is purely ideological, to bring down what they consider the target of their hate: patriarchy a.k.a. western civilization.

^

But what happens when there isn’t western civilization to protect them?

^

Oh wait, it implies they’re intelligent and know what they’re doing

Which they aren’t

They’re retards like @✿ Mittens ✿

The point of an ideology is so you can act without having to think.

^

exactly

it's for people like @✿ Mittens ✿

@✿ Mittens ✿ is a soyboy

Pretty interesting how the NN nerds are going about their campaign. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/11/29/public-comments-to-the-federal-communications-commission-about-net-neutrality-contain-many-inaccuracies-and-duplicates/

"In total, 21.7 million comments were submitted electronically and posted online for review."

that's a metric fuck-ton of comments

"Of the 21.7 million comments posted, 6% were unique. The other 94% were submitted multiple times – in some cases, hundreds of thousands of times. In fact, the seven most-submitted comments (six of which argued against net neutrality regulations) comprise 38% of all the submissions over the four-month comment period."

so it was basically a clusterfuck of who knows?

"The most common “name”... in nearly 17,000 instances ... [was] “Net Neutrality”"

"“The Internet” also appeared as the name in almost 7,500 submissions. "

As a seperate name, "net neutrality" also had about 5,000 submissions.

I've been on the end of this. The campaigners were quoting 100ks of people had written in but we binned 90% of them cus they were cut paste

cut and paste ain't YOUR opinion

a whole load more were edited versions of a template they posted on facebook

didn't bin those but still....

So NN was full of shills?

Of course

What a shocker /s

This is why they’ll never get anything achieved

It can just be flagged as a bot shitting out spam and the lazy congressmen can just ignore what ever emails were unique

you know.

I was reading something unrelated to NN, yet it summed up why... or at least one of the reasons why, I am so skeptical of it

Many people seem to point to Australia as having a great healthcare system because of the mix between private and public

Just like the UK 👌🏿

thus assuming it has a good balance between 'the big three' (that you supposedly can only have two of), being affordability, quality and accessibility

howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrr

what they don't tell you

Is that the government has bulldozed it's way into private health insurers and how they can provide them to their own customers

Let me find the relevant page on the Gov's DOH website

a'ight.

"Lifetime Health Cover is a Government initiative which was introduced on 1 July 2000, and designed to encourage people to take out hospital insurance earlier in life, and to maintain their cover over their lifetime."

sounds good, right? Get people off of public healthcare and into the private sector, save taxpayer dollars

"What is Lifetime Health Cover?
Lifetime Health Cover (LHC) is a financial loading that can be payable in addition to the base rate premium for your private health insurance hospital cover."

But how does it compel people to get private health?

"How do I avoid paying an **LHC loading**?
To avoid paying a LHC loading, you need to purchase hospital cover by 1 July **following your 31st birthday**. If you purchase hospital cover **after** this date you may be required to **pay a LHC loading** – **2% for each year you are over 30**. The loading is **removed after 10 years** of continuous hospital insurance cover."

wait, *what*?

"For instance, if you **wait until you are 40**, you could be paying an **extra 20% on the cost of your hospital cover**. If you wait until you are **50**, you could pay **40% more**. And so on, up to a maximum of 70% more."

This is for the **next ten years**, btw

but what does this have to do with NN?

"In Australia, **private health insurance is not ‘risk-rated’ like most forms of insurance**. Private health insurers **cannot refuse to insure any person**, and **must charge everyone the same premium for the same level of cover**, despite their risk profile and **likelihood of using health services.**"

Look after yourself?

Eat healthy?

Sleep well?

Don't smoke?

Don't drink?

fuck you, pay the same as the guy who does

What the actual fuck?

That’s retarded

Even if the company would be willing to offer you a better, more appealing deal

they cannot

*E Q U A L I T Y*

Why should you charge the guy who **ABUSES** his body the same as a guy who takes care of himself?

Thanks @Reaps

That just proves liberal college students don’t know jack shit when they open their mouths here

MUH AUSTRALIAN HEALTHCARE

I suppose the argument is "what if there's only one health company that will cover you? Then they'd have a monopoly and charge whatever they want!"

If the government is swooping in and forcing all companies to fix their prices at a set rate, how is that any better than the monopoly?

So because they can’t charge the abuser more because of his risk, they just charge everybody more right ?

Well, that would make business sense

To cover the cost n shieet

Help pay for Peter's broken body with healthy Paul's money

Christ this shit sounds very Soviet

Price fixing

Noone even bats an eyelid

Are most aussies fucking statist sheep?

Neither did I, except I knew I had to take out insurance before I was 32

And that was only because of the threat of loading

I didn't actually look into it any further than that

Jesus Christ this is unfucking believable

theoretically I could just not take out private health insurance

*e v e r*

and never have to worry about the loading fee

Kek

and just rely on medicare

But

Why is it theoretical?

I can only assume I'm missing something there, because that seems like a painfully obvious choice

I'll need to dig into it some more

Exactly

It was my insurance company telling me over the phone about this, then they sent me the gov info on it

Why work when you can get money for free

Wow

written by the gov, so not 'spun' by the insurance company

What a nice fucking insurance company

I’m compelled to like the company in this case

wow

But thanks for giving me fire to hit back with @Reaps

I just went to the page

It was 'updated' on the 7th of Dec

Yesterday ?!

wish I had archived it

Fuck

instead I just have a .txt document

here's what I copypasted at the time

When did you copy and paste?

the 7th ;p

they changed it a few hours after

anyway

Lifetime Health Cover is a Government initiative that started on 1 July 2000. It was designed to encourage people to take out hospital insurance earlier in life, and to maintain their cover.
In Australia, private health insurance is not ‘risk-rated’ like most forms of insurance. Private health insurers cannot refuse to insure any person, and must charge everyone the same premium for the same level of cover, despite their risk profile and likelihood of using health services.

LHC is a financial loading that can be payable in addition to the base rate premium for your private health insurance hospital cover. If you purchase hospital cover earlier in life, and keep it, you will pay lower premiums compared to someone who joins when they are older.

LHC loadings apply only to hospital cover. They do not apply to private health insurance general treatment cover (also known as ancillary or extras cover).

Wait

Dude

To avoid paying a LHC loading, you need to purchase hospital cover by 1 July following your 31st birthday. If you purchase hospital cover after this date you may be required to pay a LHC loading – 2% for each year you are over 30. For instance, if you wait until you are 40, you could be paying an extra 20% on the cost of your hospital cover. If you wait until you are 50, you could pay 40% more. And so on, up to a maximum of 70% more.

If you are a new migrant to Australia, and are aged 31 or over, you will not have to pay a LHC loading if you purchase hospital cover within 12 months of being registered for full Medicare benefits.

If you delay purchasing hospital cover for more than 12 months after your registration, you will have to pay 2% more for each year you are aged over 30 when you purchase your hospital cover.
Any LHC loading that you pay will be removed from your hospital cover premium after you have held hospital cover for 10 continuous years. However, if you cancel your hospital cover after the LHC loading has been removed, you may become liable to pay a LHC loading again in the future.

If you were born on or before 1 July 1934, you are exempt from the LHC loading. You can purchase hospital cover at any time and pay the base rate premium.

Copy it again, put it in a new txt file and use file compare

See which parts have disappeared:

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-privatehealth-lhc-providers-general.htm

I already know what's been 'updated', believe me

maybe someone was like 'oh shit, *that* sounds bad'

https://text-compare.com

ooo

someone archived it back in 2012

Hold up I’m on mobile i can’t do it right now

let's see what it said then

yeah

I was implying they removed the bits about private companies being compelled to charge the same rate regardless of the individuals health risk

however

archive.is 2012 version appears to be nearly identical, save for a phone number and other minutae

http://archive.is/7C0k

Pretty annoyed at myself tho

Using archive.is is just not a habit for me

forcing companies to give products to people that don't meet their criteria always goes well 👌🏿

google cahce has saved me

cached on 3rd of Dec

bahahaha

gotcha bitch

Hahahha

Noce

@Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 yeah, it just results in shitter products or no products

http://archive.is/UVYIk

Still puzzled why they'd randomly decide to remove that, though. I mean, it hadn't been updated since June, and those particular sections hadn't been touched since at *least* 2012

And I'm not tinfoil-hat enough to believe some gov employee saw someone access that webpage and then copy the text from it, and suddenly had an urge to scrub those particular lines

Yeah

Really makes you think

🤔🤔🤔😕

<:think_cartoon:378717098618388491>

anyhoo

yeah

that concludes my presentation for tonight

Very interesting reaps

Very fucking interesting

anyhoo, next time you hear someone go 'yeah but what about Australia' let them know that private healthcare... isn't exactly entirely private

thanks for that reaps

you da best

pham

Meanwhile at Commmonwealth Headquarters naniPvp

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42277040

Kek

Threasa kike

jfc.

Wow I’m totally not shocked at all

http://www.dailywire.com/news/24480/breaking-moore-accuser-admits-she-wrote-note-under-ben-shapiro

Of course she faked the shit

two points

1) it's still claimed that all but the small note at the end of the yearbook is still true

2) why fucking make shit up in the first place, especially if the rest of is *is* credible?

_______________________

I read the npr piece, and unless I'm missing something (it *is* super-late here), this really doesn't seem like something someone should feel compelled to resign for

"Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., is the third member of Congress to announce his resignation this week, saying that he had **discussed surrogacy** with two female subordinates.

oh *noooooeeeeeeeees*

Unless the implication is that he propositioned to fuck them and then take the child away from them at the end of it, I have nfi

But the way this reads, it could just as easily have been him simply wanting to discuss the topic *of* surrogacy

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/42291541

CALL AN AMBULANCE!

MAN DOWN, I REPEAT MAN DOWN!

Kek

Madlad

https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/939251537712254976

responses are great

What is this? text for ants?

IT'S ONLY FOUR CLICKS AWAY DAMMIT

They're trying to appeal to that significant trans demographic.

Could that be the thing that drives women out of politics? Men in dresses and makeup?

The responses are actually pretty intelligent

Palestinans are dirtbags

And there’s no point in appeasing any of them

Really wish I'd gotten a copy of that newspaper now

Some 'expert in Islamic affairs' or something was all "zomg what was he thinking?!?!"

Meanwhile even the Labor party in Israel is like 💯 about the decision

kek

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-08/what-locals-think-of-trumps-jerusalem-move/9239080

fucking retards

Jerusalem already was the fucking capital of israel

no country had their embassy there

because

MUH ARAB FEE-FEES

these fuckers deserve to be defenerstrated

@Deleted User i am looking forward for the 4th intifada

Gaza will be bombed to the ground

Kek

Gaza will be Israeli after that