shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 201/856
| Next
It's all good mate.
no wait, Sweden and Germany are muslim countries doing better ๐
It's true that Israel is better than muslim countries but muslim countries don't protect their bad behavior onto the west.
didnt half of them pay Clintons election?
not to mention all those refoogies committing crimes 'n seach
SA paid the clintons a lot.
Alot of shitty people funded the Clintions.
Yes
A lot of shitty people LOST MONEY on funding the clintons ๐
Soros mainly.
Fuck (((Soros))).
agreed, he's a bastard
Lol he is just old silly man trying to do what he think is good
Soros is hungarian?
Ye he is
But they are not very proud of him there
he's smart enough to know many of the things he does aren't good
that said, i don't consider him to be the "evil globalist king with his legions of blind leftists"
its like the people calling Trump a stupid idiot and deranged, and crazy
These guys are more clever than that, its all just an act
he has the right to waste his money on whatever he wants
I don't think that is a problem of the current system
people tend to get too simplistic on these things "It's all because Soros paid ya" same as "You have that opinion because you receive money from Oil companies, somehow!!"
exactly, that was the point i was trying to make
people either say he's harmless, or satan incarnate
To me he's just a business man who does what he thinks is best for his investments/companies/wealth
Its just that i think he's a bastard because i disagree with many of his policies ๐
the pyramids were not built with slaves, science has known this for a decade or more. building the pyramids was seen as one of the most important projects to the nation and people were payed well and honored to participate
and look how egypt ended up
They didnt follow the pyramid slave labor ritual so they got canned by Osiris
Slave thyne pyramids people!
@Arch-Fiend do you have a good source on that?
There are a ton of weird conspiracies surrounding the pyramids.
And ancient Egypt in general.
Citing ancient history seems to be a bad idea given how often we prove ourselves wrong outside very general statements.
its clearly aliens and sorcery
Ancient Egyptians were furries, and we all know not underestimate the thought processes of furries
Itโs quite simple. Nature does not allow things that serve no purpose. Itโs with this firmly in mind that I offer the followโฆ the female orgasm doesnโt exist. Itโs a myth propagated by women to exert control over men. Let me explain.
The male orgasm is what releases our sperm into the female (or onto or all over depending which porn you prefer). There is a point behind it. The so-called female orgasm doesnโt release an egg or even help the mating ritual along. Itโs superfluous to act of intercourse, window dressing. Evolution wouldnโt allow it. So why would females pretend to achieve this โstateโ? Now thatโs the right question. Itโs all about power over males. So many girlie-men these days are concerned about their partners โsatisfactionโ. The women put on these elaborate shows to either reward or punish their man.
A study done was done in 1977 by the Reproductive Biology Research Foundation at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Washington University in St. Louis where they recorded some of the first laboratory data on the anatomy and physiology of human sexual response based on direct observation of 382 women. Their findings on the nature of female sexual arousal and orgasm would have dispelled many long standing misconceptions had not the National Organization of Women (NOW) stepped in and made sure that everyone at the RBRF clammed up. Somewhere tucked safely in a vault in Missouri is proof that females canโt have orgasms.
So my message is clear. Women, enough with the theatrics ok? Iโm not handling out any Emmysโฆ just lay there and take it like a wildebeest will you? And guys, donโt let your girl play with your head. Do like I do. Just get in, get out and plant the seeds of the next generationโฆ hopefully one that doesnโt have to live under the dark tyranny of the female โorgasmโ.
Christ, even the second sentence is wrong with a single observation of the fact that men have nipples.
Repost =p
So, I repost. Does it stop the post from being epic? I think not.
her twitter is protected now. i guess she can't take constructive criticism.
or she now has enough tweets herself. who knows
Journalist gets OWNED by her OWN LOGIC.
No, but seriously. What a shit show.
Did journalists cry foul at Snopes?
snopes ๐
It's not desirable.
imo, they're no different than a blog site that does their own research anyway to me.
i'm not sure that snopes does any research
What you get when you have an Australian style immigration system. You just get Aisan domination.
The idea that Africa is sophisticating at the same time that their population is exploding compared to Asia and the West is ridiculous. Its the very ignorance and lack of structure that breeds unsustainable reproduction rates, which Africa has had for the past 40 years.
Africa's population is exploding because of increased access to western medication & their birth rate remaining steady. Where in the past a majority of these kids would die from malaria before they were 5, they're now surviving in record numbers thanks to organizations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
And unlike many western nations & Asian nations, Africans aren't financially punished for having children
Even with high birth deaths, countries like Nigeria tripled their pop in only a few decades. If they were truly sophisticating their repro numbers would be in decline due to work and life goals, like in the West and Asia. Their cultures are still very different.
Is a negative birth rate sustainable tho?
Kinda. As the population goes down demand for labor goes up & people can afford to have children again
Things do tend to sort themselves out.
But they can't, because that takes at least one more person out of the labor force for at least a year or 2, preferably 10-15 at least. And it will take probably at least 14 years for new labor to enter the work force. So while families can afford to have children, companies can't so they will have to shrink.
It's an odd problem
Well, it's a race condition really, who can win. Jobs still around needing to be filled or new work force
But I guess life is a bit of a loop of growth followed by death
Not necessarily. Thats where jobs can be outsourced. It does create a problem in and of itself.. the jobs here become more qualified, making barriers to entry especially for the mothers who left to have children in the first place.
Life was simple when women where not allowed to work eh?
amirite
JP proven right again, we are still working out the unintended consequences of women being allowed to work
I mean, technically the state should have a stake in seeing positive or neutral birth rates. Which would consitiute taking over as the company to give a mother supplemental income. But that fucks with the market a bit. It would start to free up space for labor competition, but also basically allow companies to start at half the salary they should be offering
Hmmm, I wonder what a 100% tax break to married mother's would do?
If we want to uphold the convention of marriage and reproduction, yes. That tired old horse we keep beating. The progressives wanna move past that. Both ideas have merit but whenever you want to change something for the better, its the road paved with good intentions that leads to hell.
tax break to married mothers? Fix the black issue, no doubt.
Larry Elder would be happy.
Would go a way to helping the problem of needing to incomes to support a family.
Two*
The problem with marriage was two fold. 1) it was tied to religious norms, which it shouldn't have been. At least the governmental side of things, 2) it carried too much not related to reproduction.
I'm sure that would create its own discriminatory EOC for males issue and they'd end up making more money *again*
Religion should have been separate from state, yes, but its sorta tied to the culture that moved wester from Europe. Can't really break those norms when they're part of the bedrock.
A 100% tax break contract for 2 people who have conceived a child for 18 years if they remain together. For those 18 years, financially, you are one unit. Only 1 18 year contract allowed for any one person. May be extended for subsequent children with the same person for up to 3 times.
Something like that
Sounds like a lot of rules, man. What're ya some kind of socialist?
lol
@zero_consequences the government side of it didn't need to be called or remain being called marriage.
Lmao, well that's if we want something the state does. And that is a big if.
But basically it's saying you can only get this tax break for 1 couple so long as they remain together, and you can only get it up to 3 times.
3 times per person.
I'm not religious but I know it creates a structure for life that progressivism lacks so I tend to side with conservatives on most issues like this, even though they believe in a man in the sky and that they'll live up in that sky with him.
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 201/856
| Next