shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 202/856
| Next
Basically, the only important part of the idea of marriage is having two parents until you are at least in your late teens
Would marriage counseling be part of this process, and is it sponsored or funded by the gov? My folks tried that a lot and they had very little incentive to stay together other than us kids.
I don't care if you wanna believe in God. I myself do believe in a higher power. I just find it ridiculous that anyone thinks some guy 2000 years ago got it all right
@zero_consequences it's a tax break. It's basically a gift for staying together. Want to split up? Fine, you lose the break. Want to have a second kid with someone new while in that 18 contract? Fine, he doesn't get a tax break, and if you split from the other guy, neither do you.
positive reinforcement. You do what we need you to do, enjoy the gift. Dont want to? Fine. Be like every other average Joe.
Deserves scrutiny but I like it.
This could be extended to adoption and maybe even same sex couples
Tax breaks are always a better route than government programs anyway.
Less is more
It would be easiest to start with biological parents first
Adoption is pretty hard to do from what I hear so I doubt there'd be much manipulation there.
Same sex couples are still on the fence. I think not enough data.
Although I think it's less the sex and more the role that matters. There are single parents who turn out perfectly fine kids it's just very hard
The phrase "it takes a village to raise a child" came from somewhere
But the tax breaks have an added bonus of defunding the government ;)
yeah, until some politician decides that tax breaks for all wamen is a right, and they'll make the rich pay for it or something
So much of a right, that their patriarchal husbands must pay extra in taxes. There we go. Back to square one.
Lmao
So there was a limit on 3 per person, the idea being a 1/3rd growth rate max. This limit could be raised or lowered in theory to speed up or lower the cap. The idea being any chance applies to everything going forward. So if the limit was 3 but you have a 4 the kid still under 18 (or 15 may be better), and they raise the limit, you can apply to get a tax break for the remaining years, and it aims to encourage those who stopped at 3 or under to have another child or two.
Maybe allow people to offer up their limits to others. Since it's basically a per person limit, if people who don't have or want children want to basically transfer their limit to someone with a child already over the limit, they can. So a family with 3 kids has a 4th, and they can get two other people to sign off, basically saying "this child is being used in place of my own". Allows for more personal choice while trying to keep the birth limit sustainable.
Its doubtful this country will have resurgence in religion barring any rapture, so the large family size that went with it is likely only left to new immigrants. Having a cap would be good.
financial cap anyway, for those tax breaks. people can have as many kids as they want I don't care.. but hopefully this would also break some of the funding to welfare to single moms/married poverty.
Well in my experience, poor people, regardless of religion, have lots of kids.
The Bible belt isn't exactly rich, and inner city bitches aren't having 4 kids with 4 baby daddies because Jesus said so
We all fuck at the same rate (more or less), but if you have the responsibly to want to use contraception, you will probably not end up poor.
I think it's more about education than income.
Generally wealthier areas have a better educated population.
if you have large companys shrink you will have small bussinesses increase to meet the demand for labor. small businesses suffer most when large bussinesses monopolize on both the workforce and the consumer base. as the workforce shrinks, the company shrinks, it cant afford to reach as many consumers, consumers in areas that cant be reached rely on local small businesses. fluctuations within the market have a weaker effect on the economy when you have less monopoly, this creates a more stable local envirnment where people settle closer to where they are born, communitys grow stronger, this reinforces birthrates, this feeds back into the economy and you see a new boom as businesses try to meet the demands for work and production.
the monkey wrench in this process is outsourcing and foreign labor which is used to prevent this process because it means there is a period of depreciation for large bussinesses and they have the power to try and do anything possible to prevent perceived loses
this is compounded by the welfair state
when businesses are free to do whatever they want without limit they are free to choose who benefits from their system. if the population has a problem their natural instincts to help their fellow man will be overcome by a need for survival and its easy to justify the slow neglect of your native population for another by thinking your just treating all humans the same
i needed that dugamar thank you
lmao yes thank you
Did I troll gud?
you didnt troll
you made a valid point
and he couldnt handle it
<:vallekek:444556527660040203>
I got a good chuckle.
Is he trying to shame you for having only a few friends? What a jerk. A racist jerk, apparently.
I hate Twitter. ๐
followers aren't friends
he knew the only way to stop people seeing it was to delete his own tweet.
I got 5 likes on it in just a few minutes
it worked, nobody will see it now, lol
I'm "harassing" him, by making literally the EXACT same accusation he made against Elon Musk... except mine was MORE accurate, lol. And I'M the troll?
What a douche.
welcome to twitter
where everyone is an asshole
How do people even watch Infowars I cringed at that video so hard I couldn't make it through. We are really in dire need of alternative news if that is what people watch that mistrust established media....
yet our supreme exalted cabinet leaders all seem oblivious to that
(((ROTHSCHILD)))
fkin jews amirite
@LEER Yeah, I don't know how people regularly sit through entire videos. I've also wondered how many take Jones seriously, and how many are simply entertained by his antics.
Didnโt she shame delete this?
lmao
wow that is projecting
"oh yeah, the last star wars movie was divisive, this one has had a major troubled development.... it must be because of race. nothing else."
starwars was already dead to me after 8 so this is just rot
same
agreed
i'll take a look at it through a streaming site to decide if it is good or bad.
that said, despite being a bit more predictable than it needed to be, i didn't think rogue one was all that bad
moviewise? no
Lorewise, it screwed over Kyle Katarn's main contribution to the Rebels
unforgivable
well they did throw out the EU
and i don't blame them, there is some major crap out there in the EU
theres many things wrong and crap about the SW EU
But Kyle Katarn wasn't one of them ๐
The Thrawn Trilogy is awesome as well
and Darth Plagueis
Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Plagueis The Wise?
it's a great freaking story that the idiots at Disney didn't like
Thrawn is pretty much cannon now, and no one but Timothy Zahn seems to be allowed to really write him. and this is all for the good
yup
I like the Thrawn novel that came out last year
It's not a story DISNEY would tell you.
haha ๐
looking forward to this one as well
aw jesus
it's not fake, is it?
you know shits gone down the drain
when you cant tell anymore
is the kid fined that?
@Dr.Wol i knew shit was going down the drain when i couldn't figure out which article in a line-up was from the onion
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 202/856
| Next