Wow, for Stockholm police, flirting is prettttttty awkward....

@AussieAryan#2292 It's more than 5 try 19.5

Someone with a right wing view

someone with a left wing view

It's the people with both you gotta watch out for.

Who is that second one even meant for?

evul joo's

found out why sjw's don't like Asians, or at least Koreans, they must vote republican: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCYT9Hew9ZU

I think it's like half and half with Asians, with younger being more prone to being Democrat

thats every race, its a human thing,

When you're young, you got nothing, so you want stuff, and thus stick with the people that say they wanna give you stuff,
Then you get older, and start to accumilate your own capital, and you're like "this is mine, get your own", and stick to the party that wants you to keep your stuff

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/407763104542359552/431140060986081300/29598209_2055156571439651_2212656194676654446_n.png

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407345200969547777/431158891276140556/image-7.png

Sorry @Grenade123 Asians don't vote majorty republican.

@Deleted User it was a joke your racist ass is too dense to get. Asians are lumped under white people in the eyes of regressives. You think they will keep voting democrate when they start pushing for Asains to be killed?

I'm curious who the "Other" category classify themselves as, and why they voted 1/3 for Trump.

The regressives have a point there though becase like White people Asians have a IQ higher than the 90's so they can maintain a functioning society and do well in the society unlike Blacks and Hispanics.

I think Mexico would be doing pretty well if not for their gang problem.

Presumably because of the same problem our law enforcement has: they can't just go in and root out the gangs.

Your right but you need to understant that they have a gang problem because of the large hispanic population.

I'm not gonna say why one way or another, you could be right, it could be something else. By all rights if Mexico were functioning "properly" given all the resources they have down there, they should have an amazing and thriving economy.

Plus, a lot of the cartels down there have a lot of money. If I remember, it's much the same problem we have here in the US where outside forces have a lot of money and influence over the government. In our case it's corporations and companies, whereas down there I think it's the cartels.

In fact, that's why I fully support the construction of the wall and much harsher immigration policies to keep illegal immigrants out.

"Youtube are great.. They sent me an ipod touch!" - Tim Pool

Yes, I think building the wall and keeping the illegals out would be the single greatest humanitarian thing we can do for Mexico.

I think were the US not being used as a 'pressure valve' to allow people to flee, people who would otherwise have risen up and overthrown their government by now, Mexico could very well have already been very different than it is today.

Basically, they need a second Mexican Revolution.

*tfw someone's been typing for about 10 minutes*

With the wealth thing why is Iceland wealthy fo most of there history all they had was a fishing industry, domestic farming industry and small scale tourism. They are wealthy becase of the people. Mexico has a large land area with lots of resources like oil, silver, copper, salt, fluorspar, iron, manganese, sulfur, phosphate, zinc, tungsten, molybdenum, mercury, gold, and gypsum but they are poor because the people have a lower average IQ. I agree that money is never good in the political system weather foreign or domestic and we need to de what we can to prevent it being a problem. Other majorty non-white countries in Latin America have similar problems with cartels and I agree that the war on durges is a cause of the problem problem but you need to ask yourslef why is Latin America so corrupt in the frist place. I think it's becase of the large non white population if you don't belive me it seems to be that the least corrupt countries are the whitest ones. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index
I agree that illegal immigration is never a good thing for a country who ever if you kicked out all the illegals America will still be majorty non-white if present trends continue so you are still going to be greater mexico anyway. I don't see how having another Mexican revolution qould help even if the right people win whats to stop Mexico becoming shit again?

Well, real quick about Iceland: much of their wealth is through imports. In fact, just in January of 2018 alone imports accounted for about 42% of the nation's wealth.

But I'm not an economist, that was just the first thing that came to mind.

And I was only talking about the Mexican crisis in a void, not how that problem spills over into the US, because I see the illegal immigration as a symptom of that. I wasn't even contesting your claim about Mexico also possibly being bad because of the populations average IQ, and even acknowledged that "you could be right" about it.
I was just saying that building the wall and strengthening immigration policies *and enforcement* is probably the best thing we can do for Mexico and give them the best opportunity to reform. Now, if we did all of that and they still did nothing about their situation, then it's safe to say it's entirely on them at that point.

The issue of the hispanic population growing in the US I'm not denying exists, I just for the sake of the conversation about Mexico was just separating it for right now.

I was just saying that the situation in Mexico is so bad right now that there is nothing that can fix it at this point other than just a full-scale revolution, that's all.

Whether they actually conduct such a revolution is entirely up to them.

gotta anneal brass tonight

Wait, if wealth is imported that means Iceland is selling stuff, right?

...like I said, I'm not an economist...

Well, that's the US public education system for you right there. lol

Even back in my day they were more worried about teaching kids about how great islam was than more practical stuff.

Like economics.

My point with Iceland was that a country can be wealthy without many natural resources. I think another good exsample is Japan which like Iceland doesn't have many natural resources and has natural disasters every few years or so and dosen't even grow enough food to feed themsleves but because they Japanes IQ is so high they are successful.
As I said earlier I agree that illegal immigration is not a good thing I wouldn't care if it was illegal Canadian immigration or Rusian it would still be bad for America. I have to dissagree with you that a revolution would help Mexico no system of government tried in Mexico has made it anywhere as prosperous as Texsa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_between_U.S._states_and_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
Mexico will never be as prospeous untill the Mexican people improve.

Mexico would be even worse off were it not for the huge amount of money that people send from the US to Mexico--more than $26 billion during Jan-Nov 2017 http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/02/news/economy/mexico-remittances/index.html

Basically, "Mexico would be worse off if it weren't leeching off of the US's economy."

That's pretty evident.

I'd rather Mexico be a viable country and trade partner than one that is practically being subsidized by the United States and dragging us down with them.

Very true mate but you have to rember that alot of hispanics want to regain the forma Mexican territories it has lost to America to either rejoin Mexico or create a new country and with demographic trends I don't see how you will stop them.

I wouldn't say "alot" believe that (I am just guessing though) but there is a determined group that do agree to the whole Aztlan movement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztl%C3%A1n#Use_by_the_Chicano_movement

@JadenFrostwolf Whether you like it or not America is already subsidizing Mexico and it's still shit. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/01/26/us-aid-320-million-mexico-wall-trump-specialists-backfire/97103024/

Yeah.
Well, whether it be from an active coordinated effort or through sheer coincidence, the effect is going to be the same: those states/territories are going to become majority hispanic.

California is leading the way

(into the shitter)

Both demographically and econonically/politically

( i butchered that spelling)

Again, though, that doesn't detract from my point that I'd rather Mexico be a legitimate country with it's own flourishing economy and an actual trade partner and just justifies that desire.

But that's just not gonna happen without massive changes, changes which I don't see as likely to happen 'on their own.'

I would agree with that. They should sink or swim on their own. Unfortunately if they do fail then nothing short of a solid wall from Pacific to Gulf would prevent a tidal wave of people coming north

@JadenFrostwolf The only way that could happen if Mexico had a better population and a homogeneous population.

Mexico is pretty homogeneous, isn't it?

It's a blending of natives and Spanish with a smattering of other groups in small numbers thrown in

https://www.statista.com/statistics/275439/ethnic-groups-in-mexico/

But yeah, I think the main reason there has not been a revolution by now is because people can flee into the US. If there is an out from a bad situation, people will take it; though, if someone is cornered and trapped, they will fight or submit, and under such circumstances people will only submit for so long.

For example, there is (or at least was) a small group of blonde haired, blue eyed Mennonites living there

I wasn't aware of the varied ethnicities in Mexico.

We can all agreee with you there Jaden. The Mexicans need to stay in Mexico.

I do know that the 'natives' of the land before the Spanish arrived still resided there in small numbers... I think the Aztecs? They were very distinct from the Mexicans because they were far shorter. You could tell them apart just by looking at them.

I didn't know about the other ethnicities, though.

Interesting.

But yeah, I'm fully aware of the racial displacement going on in the SW right now. I grew up in it.

I saw first-hand as neighborhoods turned into ghettos and garbage dumps.

I know detractors will scream, "ANECDOTE!! ANECDOTE!! HISSS!!", but I just don't care. lol

That doesn't mean it's not happening.

I grew up in Chicago and saw the same sort of thing. neighborhoods went through cycles-nice neighborhoods turned bad and some bad neighborhood gentrified and turned around. Chicago might be the one off though. Detroit is the other extreme

I specifically remember my father one day telling me that I'm not allowed to wear red or blue shirts anymore, because I might accidentally catch the attention of the opposite 'gang' and they might think I'm part of their enemy's tribe.

Out of nowhere.

It was an uncommon thing *not* to hear gunshots in the middle of the night where I grew up.

Halsey is on purple dragon

and

Uh oh. lol

it's now OK with ethno nationalism on some level

it's really strange

It's funny how that keeps happening.

I never heard gunshots in the neighborhood I lived in but 2 miles west in the neighborhood that I went to school in there were alot of gangs and they were not shy in making their presence known

I've listened to all sorts of folks argue it

and I never buy into it

Now both neighborhoods are in the upper income/upper real estate priced areas of Chicago

Not sure why Halsey is willing to bend over to it

Because there's nothing to 'buy into', it works.

Just about every country on the planet before 1965 was an ethnostate, including the US, be it through function or active enforcement of it.

Not the US really, heavy majority, sure; but it depends on where you bend the leaf as to who falls into what section

i.e. hatred of the irish, scottish, krauts

etc