Saw this and thought y’all would get a kick out of it.

Source:

https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/continuing-coverage/coronavirus/ohio-department-of-health-now-recommending-those-in-ohio-avoid-traveling-to-ohio

LOL... Ohioans advised to not travel to Ohio. Lots of Ohioans freaking out right now

This whole thing is becoming a giant meme. 😂

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHXZvwlwDg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDluyhfvwU4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpMfM9qa570

Man... I cant believe CNN supports these dangerous conspiracy theories

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA2DWMHgLnc

look at this dangerous misinformation

Interesting in that CNN video that the Tech Guy said that he will be doing his voting the more secure way... requesting a MAIL IN BALLOT... because, no shocker here, it supplies us with a paper trail.

weird

i wonder why we arent allowed to examine the paper trail

Um... no reason to... Just losing an election doesnt mean you get to tear the country asunder with all this nonsense

you do get to have poll watchers examine the counting process

but when they get kicked out and you count votes without their presence

then you create cause to challenge the results

@RobertGrulerEsq getting worked up now ... good on him

Well... that never happened.

really?

theres video proof

Yes

video proof

hundreds of sworn affidavits

so the poll watchers didnt get kicekd out?

There is no proof that Rep watchers were treated any differently than Dem

or they didnt count when the poll watchers werent there?

and your point being?

they were counting votes without any observation

that is illegal

No law was broken, not sure what to tell ya. Read the opinions of the courts

and cause for challenge

The judges so far disagree with you

many appointed by Trump

the goalposts keep shifting

Huh?

theres no proof!

ok but that proof doesnt count!

ok but that proof isnt enough!

Well do you mean evidence or proof?

ok big guy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jKLxP6oX-4&feature=share

Because there is technically evidence. An affidavit is evidence. And while that affidavit is evidence it may well not go to prove the claim

Which is what courts are for

And the courts so far have laughed them out of court

uh huh

Sorry man, that is just a fact

so

what was happening in the video that was linked

where people were kicked out and votes were being counted

Yes and affidavit is evidence... as it can be presented to a court. But that does not mean that evidence goes to prove the claim. That evidence might not be reliable or even relevant

So me the video... I havent seen anything like that. If that video is out then then it needs to be attached as an exhibit in court

sorry so/show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e35f4pUIYOg

about 30 mins in

OHHHH yeah... that GA one that was completely debunked and explained this morning. Gotcha.... hahahaha

watch the hearing

uhh

it was debunked this morning?

before this hearing?

Yeah. Just do some research my friend.

I mean he is the President he should be able to get the most Hugely Tremendous lawyers... but they keep leaving him because they don't want to be sanctioned by the courts for bringing frivilous lawsuits

"a non zero number" of Republican poll watchers were in the room.... lol what a joke

so i have to do my own research

where?

why dont you provide it

Because Im not your paralegal and you are the one trying to make an affirmative claim of fraud

ah i see

so the source is your ass

well no my prostate is tho

i provide video when asked and you say 'debunked'

and no proof of such

ok

Dude... read the court opinions... Team Trump is what 2 wins to 41 losses at this point?

you asked me to do research im unable to locate any article or video that disproves the video i provided

since this article MUST exist

im sure you could grace me with the link

I watched that video already it doesnt show what you claim

Im sorry

oh ok

guess ill just stop believing my lying eyes

thank you for imparting your great wisdom on me

Well you might want to get glasses if you saw anyone being "kicked out" of anywhere

its simply not on that video

I am absolutely glad that it was videoed like most all polling places and counting centers are... Everyone knows they are videoed from several angles to discourage fraud and to catch mistakes. So if there is what you claim then it should be super easy to prove, shouldnt it?

No it was not debunked

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy Good show today! That video was certainly a spicy one, and I'm sure many people are waiting with baited breath for your commentary on Kyle's preliminary hearing tomorrow. (I know I am!)

Unfortunately the prosecutor seems much more coherent and well-spoken than Rittenhouse's representatives.

@RobertGrulerEsq Regarding the superchat I posted on your live stream, when unequivocal evidence that the election in Georgia was conducted in violation of the U.S. Constitution, Federal and State Law, how can the election be legally certified? In a legal perspective, allowing the election to stand when it was Unconstitutional and unlawful, it would set a precendent that the Law no longer applies to Georgia elections. Other States would then follow suit if they see that no one is held accountable for noncompliance with the Law. Just my thoughts.

That and I think Rittenhouse's representatives are intentionally misinterpreting the statute, which isn't the best look in my opinion.

Have a Constitution question for the boss man.

I am not sure he has attorneys.

I missed the video

Yay slides! All good :) @FaithJoy

@RobertGrulerEsq I consider from time to time Amendments, or how I would rewrite the Constitution. One that I have considered is a restriction on bailiwicks that grants SCotUS the authority to place the Legislature in emergency session to legislate clarifications for unclear or incomplete law using a Call of the House (until they fix the issue they may not leave the floor even to use the privy) in order to deal with emergency cases, such as death penalty and treason cases. And then also the power to place less important needs on the agenda of the session, where the session may not end and goes into a call of the house if they do not legislate on the issue by the end of the session. What do you think of this as part of an amendment requiring Originalism in the Court?

Did the Trump team denounce Sidney Powell as part of his team because of conflict of interest since she represented M.Flynn, seems like now that Trump pardon Flynn, she's back on the team

No

They had separate legal theories/approaches to the issue and they could not work them at the same time. It would confuse the issue and make a settlement in their favor more difficult.

http://www.repmetcalfe.com/News/18684/Latest-News/Lawmakers-Call-on-Wolf-to-Convene-PA-General-Assembly-for-Special-Session-on-Election-Oversight-and-Integrity-

no the reason was more likely that she pushed really batshit crazy ideas and pissed off the upper echelon of gop. They, gop, don't want do loose ga's senate seats in january.

Sounds like their checks just got balanced 💯