Message from @JD~Jordan

Discord ID: 784235206705938452


2020-12-04 01:43:45 UTC  

where people were kicked out and votes were being counted

2020-12-04 01:43:54 UTC  

Yes and affidavit is evidence... as it can be presented to a court. But that does not mean that evidence goes to prove the claim. That evidence might not be reliable or even relevant

2020-12-04 01:44:35 UTC  

So me the video... I havent seen anything like that. If that video is out then then it needs to be attached as an exhibit in court

2020-12-04 01:44:41 UTC  

sorry so/show

2020-12-04 01:45:06 UTC  

about 30 mins in

2020-12-04 01:45:29 UTC  

OHHHH yeah... that GA one that was completely debunked and explained this morning. Gotcha.... hahahaha

2020-12-04 01:45:35 UTC  

watch the hearing

2020-12-04 01:46:17 UTC  

uhh

2020-12-04 01:46:24 UTC  

it was debunked this morning?

2020-12-04 01:46:27 UTC  

before this hearing?

2020-12-04 01:46:46 UTC  

Yeah. Just do some research my friend.

2020-12-04 01:47:48 UTC  

I mean he is the President he should be able to get the most Hugely Tremendous lawyers... but they keep leaving him because they don't want to be sanctioned by the courts for bringing frivilous lawsuits

2020-12-04 01:48:10 UTC  

"a non zero number" of Republican poll watchers were in the room.... lol what a joke

2020-12-04 01:48:16 UTC  

so i have to do my own research

2020-12-04 01:48:20 UTC  

where?

2020-12-04 01:48:22 UTC  

why dont you provide it

2020-12-04 01:50:22 UTC  

Because Im not your paralegal and you are the one trying to make an affirmative claim of fraud

2020-12-04 01:50:32 UTC  

ah i see

2020-12-04 01:50:35 UTC  

so the source is your ass

2020-12-04 01:50:43 UTC  

well no my prostate is tho

2020-12-04 01:50:46 UTC  

i provide video when asked and you say 'debunked'

2020-12-04 01:50:50 UTC  

and no proof of such

2020-12-04 01:50:56 UTC  

ok

2020-12-04 01:51:29 UTC  

Dude... read the court opinions... Team Trump is what 2 wins to 41 losses at this point?

2020-12-04 01:51:52 UTC  

you asked me to do research im unable to locate any article or video that disproves the video i provided

2020-12-04 01:52:02 UTC  

since this article MUST exist

2020-12-04 01:52:07 UTC  

im sure you could grace me with the link

2020-12-04 01:52:12 UTC  

I watched that video already it doesnt show what you claim

2020-12-04 01:52:16 UTC  

Im sorry

2020-12-04 01:52:18 UTC  

oh ok

2020-12-04 01:54:00 UTC  

guess ill just stop believing my lying eyes

2020-12-04 01:54:08 UTC  

thank you for imparting your great wisdom on me

2020-12-04 01:55:40 UTC  

Well you might want to get glasses if you saw anyone being "kicked out" of anywhere

2020-12-04 01:55:48 UTC  

its simply not on that video

2020-12-04 01:57:29 UTC  

I am absolutely glad that it was videoed like most all polling places and counting centers are... Everyone knows they are videoed from several angles to discourage fraud and to catch mistakes. So if there is what you claim then it should be super easy to prove, shouldnt it?

2020-12-04 02:47:32 UTC  

No it was not debunked

2020-12-04 02:50:34 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy Good show today! That video was certainly a spicy one, and I'm sure many people are waiting with baited breath for your commentary on Kyle's preliminary hearing tomorrow. (I know I am!)

2020-12-04 02:52:49 UTC  

Unfortunately the prosecutor seems much more coherent and well-spoken than Rittenhouse's representatives.

2020-12-04 02:52:54 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq Regarding the superchat I posted on your live stream, when unequivocal evidence that the election in Georgia was conducted in violation of the U.S. Constitution, Federal and State Law, how can the election be legally certified? In a legal perspective, allowing the election to stand when it was Unconstitutional and unlawful, it would set a precendent that the Law no longer applies to Georgia elections. Other States would then follow suit if they see that no one is held accountable for noncompliance with the Law. Just my thoughts.

2020-12-04 02:53:54 UTC  

That and I think Rittenhouse's representatives are intentionally misinterpreting the statute, which isn't the best look in my opinion.