Message from @ImNotGas

Discord ID: 784235558258868285


2020-12-04 01:45:35 UTC  

watch the hearing

2020-12-04 01:46:17 UTC  

uhh

2020-12-04 01:46:24 UTC  

it was debunked this morning?

2020-12-04 01:46:27 UTC  

before this hearing?

2020-12-04 01:46:46 UTC  

Yeah. Just do some research my friend.

2020-12-04 01:47:48 UTC  

I mean he is the President he should be able to get the most Hugely Tremendous lawyers... but they keep leaving him because they don't want to be sanctioned by the courts for bringing frivilous lawsuits

2020-12-04 01:48:10 UTC  

"a non zero number" of Republican poll watchers were in the room.... lol what a joke

2020-12-04 01:48:16 UTC  

so i have to do my own research

2020-12-04 01:48:20 UTC  

where?

2020-12-04 01:48:22 UTC  

why dont you provide it

2020-12-04 01:50:22 UTC  

Because Im not your paralegal and you are the one trying to make an affirmative claim of fraud

2020-12-04 01:50:32 UTC  

ah i see

2020-12-04 01:50:35 UTC  

so the source is your ass

2020-12-04 01:50:43 UTC  

well no my prostate is tho

2020-12-04 01:50:46 UTC  

i provide video when asked and you say 'debunked'

2020-12-04 01:50:50 UTC  

and no proof of such

2020-12-04 01:50:56 UTC  

ok

2020-12-04 01:51:29 UTC  

Dude... read the court opinions... Team Trump is what 2 wins to 41 losses at this point?

2020-12-04 01:51:52 UTC  

you asked me to do research im unable to locate any article or video that disproves the video i provided

2020-12-04 01:52:02 UTC  

since this article MUST exist

2020-12-04 01:52:07 UTC  

im sure you could grace me with the link

2020-12-04 01:52:12 UTC  

I watched that video already it doesnt show what you claim

2020-12-04 01:52:16 UTC  

Im sorry

2020-12-04 01:52:18 UTC  

oh ok

2020-12-04 01:54:00 UTC  

guess ill just stop believing my lying eyes

2020-12-04 01:54:08 UTC  

thank you for imparting your great wisdom on me

2020-12-04 01:55:40 UTC  

Well you might want to get glasses if you saw anyone being "kicked out" of anywhere

2020-12-04 01:55:48 UTC  

its simply not on that video

2020-12-04 01:57:29 UTC  

I am absolutely glad that it was videoed like most all polling places and counting centers are... Everyone knows they are videoed from several angles to discourage fraud and to catch mistakes. So if there is what you claim then it should be super easy to prove, shouldnt it?

2020-12-04 02:47:32 UTC  

No it was not debunked

2020-12-04 02:50:34 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy Good show today! That video was certainly a spicy one, and I'm sure many people are waiting with baited breath for your commentary on Kyle's preliminary hearing tomorrow. (I know I am!)

2020-12-04 02:52:49 UTC  

Unfortunately the prosecutor seems much more coherent and well-spoken than Rittenhouse's representatives.

2020-12-04 02:52:54 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq Regarding the superchat I posted on your live stream, when unequivocal evidence that the election in Georgia was conducted in violation of the U.S. Constitution, Federal and State Law, how can the election be legally certified? In a legal perspective, allowing the election to stand when it was Unconstitutional and unlawful, it would set a precendent that the Law no longer applies to Georgia elections. Other States would then follow suit if they see that no one is held accountable for noncompliance with the Law. Just my thoughts.

2020-12-04 02:53:54 UTC  

That and I think Rittenhouse's representatives are intentionally misinterpreting the statute, which isn't the best look in my opinion.

2020-12-04 02:54:40 UTC  

Have a Constitution question for the boss man.

2020-12-04 02:55:05 UTC  

I am not sure he has attorneys.

2020-12-04 02:55:21 UTC  

I missed the video

2020-12-04 02:55:43 UTC  

Yay slides! All good :) @FaithJoy

2020-12-04 02:56:18 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq I consider from time to time Amendments, or how I would rewrite the Constitution. One that I have considered is a restriction on bailiwicks that grants SCotUS the authority to place the Legislature in emergency session to legislate clarifications for unclear or incomplete law using a Call of the House (until they fix the issue they may not leave the floor even to use the privy) in order to deal with emergency cases, such as death penalty and treason cases. And then also the power to place less important needs on the agenda of the session, where the session may not end and goes into a call of the house if they do not legislate on the issue by the end of the session. What do you think of this as part of an amendment requiring Originalism in the Court?

2020-12-04 02:57:32 UTC  

Did the Trump team denounce Sidney Powell as part of his team because of conflict of interest since she represented M.Flynn, seems like now that Trump pardon Flynn, she's back on the team

2020-12-04 02:58:40 UTC  

No