Unfortunately some of my network was not able to make the meeting, but I believe this would aid us. When sorted into a network scale, it helps us to narrow down suspects.

regardless, I’m putting NW5 on lockdown in regards to infosec and opsec

Both audio leaks were from chats with tons of people. Person is smarter than to do that with a small group. If they do, we can react to that.

not that it was ever loose to begin with but there will be changes that I wish to oversee as well as transparency amongst members.

Start requesting guys show you ID’s.

Negative. Review the Information Security guide.

Only as a last resort option of someone you find sus?

If a full attendance list is acquired, I believe it would be well to sort this list into networks so each ND knows who to pay particular attention to

No photo evidence. Physically looking at it. No Antifa would show you their license.

@ND - Eric PA I will relay the idea.

@ND - John WA If you have suspicions, there are better ways to react, and those better ways weren't conducted. Review the Meeting Intermediates document.

Boy they are not good at playing the long game

One thing I can assure you is NW5 will be an impregnable fortress after all this has concluded

Showing their hand like this will only make it harder for them

I've been following all their twitter accounts and I have to say, we have certainly gotten the upper hand now.

Never interrupt you're enemy when he is making a mistake.

The new vetting practices are effective. We caught a furry this morning.

Seriously?

Yes. He was in furry chats on Telegram and Discord

Was probably the infil.. lol

Let's cut the jokes. You guys are going to have too much work to waste time joking today and tomorrow.

Understood. We will do our best.

@ND - John WA Also, fix your profile picture.

I'll say this, when you check Telegram, look for obscure channels. Anyone who has been on Telegram in our sphere for awhile will be a lot of random content, art, philosophy, and literature etc. This dude had the big name stuff like PF and Will2Rise, very little other nationalist content.

@all

:pushpin: NOTICE :pushpin:
General Attendance Meeting Security Breach
We have a small team doing checks on a number of points of intelligence, but we need a larger force of verification to whittle down this list of names. Our infiltrator is hiding in this list. Of that we are certain. This is every name that showed up in the meeting early, before the server was reset. A full 100 names.

Direct Message me with the names that you can CONFIDENTLY, and beyond any shadow of a doubt remove from this list, and they will be removed. Do not just strike names from the list because you know a guy, or he is active, or he helped with something. Our other infiltrator was active, and moderately well known. This one may not be so obvious.

THE LIST:
<br>Kevin CO<br>Vincent KY<br>Marshall OK<br>Aaron SC<br>James TX<br>George TX<br>Jesse AR<br>Logan NC<br>Johnny ID<br>Wilson CO<br>John VA<br>Ethan OH<br>Ben CO<br>Christopher AL<br>Bryan NV<br>Vincent TX<br>Adam NY<br>Ben MD<br>Adam TX<br>Paul TX<br>Mike RI<br>Lawrence FL<br>Marcus NC<br>Vincent AZ<br>David WA<br>Jesse CO<br>Clarke IL<br>Logan UT<br>Lee KY<br>Carter MO<br>Adam SD<br>Alexander PA<br>John MN<br>Cecil OK<br>Francis MI<br>John WA<br>Alexander OR<br>Vincent VA<br>Hugh AL<br>Alan MI<br>William TX<br>Sam OH<br>Randolph IL<br>Johnny MN<br>Sam MN<br>Rex VT<br>Logan TX<br>Ryan OH<br>Jack AZ<br>Eric PA<br>Sean KS<br>Mark PA<br>Eric MI<br>Zach MO<br>Nicholas OH<br>Steven TX<br>Patrick TX<br>Gabriel IA<br>Sam MI<br>Michael IN<br>Austin TX<br>Logan CA<br>Adam PA<br>Wilson TX<br>Frederick OR<br>Oscar TX<br>Gabriel WV<br>Nick NY<br>Benjamin MI<br>Jason NY<br>Patrick NC<br>Andrew WY<br>Billy TX<br>Ulysses FL<br>Leo MO<br>Josh NH<br>Marcus WA<br>Wayne NY<br>Jeffrey OH<br>Walter OR<br>Daniel TX<br>Robert NJ<br>Nathan TX<br>Christopher VA<br>Matthew MN<br>Benjamin OH<br>James UT<br>James AL<br>Robert IL<br>Sean AL<br>Ryan PA<br>Jesse GA<br>Jon UT<br>Brian NC<br>Clarke OK<br>Peter MN<br>Grant MD<br>Jason TX<br>Adam IN<br>Oscar ID<br>Josh CA<br>Tyler CT<br>Norman GA<br>Robert IN<br>

The recording was released by Atlanta antifash. Maybe they’re from a region near there?

In fact, it was released rather quickly.

Possibly. However, they tend to share each others things and circulate them regardless of region.

Also, Vincent VA was at that meeting it seems. Coincidence? 🧐

I wonder if they would deliberately use the same alias...🤔

Vincent WA was an infil

Right

Anyhow, both the current Vincent VA and KY are vetted from last I heard. That’s not important right now and is silly speculation. Go down your lists and put a green check mark next to everyone who you know is solid, and maybe an X next to someone you question. Send to Thomas.

Already on it

All my guys that were there are clear

Logan UT

James UT

Oscar ID

Clear off Ben MD Grant MD and Christopher VA.

Paul TX and Billy TX are clear no doubt

William TX too

THE LIST:
<br>Kevin CO<br>Vincent KY<br>Marshall OK<br>Aaron SC<br>James TX<br>George TX<br>Jesse AR<br>Logan NC<br>Johnny ID✅<br>Wilson CO<br>John VA<br>Ethan OH<br>Ben CO<br>Christopher AL<br>Bryan NV<br>Vincent TX✅<br>Adam NY<br>Ben MD✅<br>Adam TX<br>Paul TX✅<br>Mike RI<br>Lawrence FL✅<br>Marcus NC<br>Vincent AZ<br>David WA✅<br>Jesse CO✅<br>Clarke IL<br>Logan UT✅<br>Lee KY<br>Carter MO<br>Adam SD<br>Alexander PA<br>John MN<br>Cecil OK<br>Francis MI<br>John WA✅<br>Alexander OR ✅❔<br>Vincent VA<br>Hugh AL<br>Alan MI<br>William TX✅<br>Sam OH<br>Randolph IL<br>Johnny MN<br>Sam MN<br>Rex VT<br>Logan TX<br>Ryan OH<br>Jack AZ<br>Eric PA✅<br>Sean KS<br>Mark PA<br>Eric MI<br>Zach MO<br>Nicholas OH<br>Steven TX<br>Patrick TX✅<br>Gabriel IA<br>Sam MI<br>Michael IN<br>Austin TX<br>Logan CA<br>Adam PA<br>Wilson TX<br>Frederick OR✅<br>Oscar TX<br>Gabriel WV<br>Nick NY<br>Benjamin MI<br>Jason NY<br>Patrick NC<br>Andrew WY<br>Billy TX✅<br>Ulysses FL<br>Leo MO<br>Josh NH<br>Marcus WA<br>Wayne NY<br>Jeffrey OH<br>Walter OR✅<br>Daniel TX<br>Robert NJ<br>Nathan TX<br>Christopher VA<br>Matthew MN✅<br>Benjamin OH<br>James UT✅<br>James AL<br>Robert IL<br>Sean AL<br>Ryan PA✅<br>Jesse GA<br>Jon UT✅<br>Brian NC<br>Clarke OK<br>Peter MN<br>Grant MD✅<br>Jason TX<br>Adam IN<br>Oscar ID✅<br>Josh CA<br>Tyler CT<br>Norman GA<br>Robert IN<br>

This is my list of guys that I believe to be 💯

@all

:pushpin: NOTICE :pushpin:
General Attendance Meeting Security Breach
We have a small team doing checks on a number of points of intelligence, but we need a larger force of verification to whittle down this list of names. Our infiltrator is hiding in this list. Of that we are certain. This is every name that showed up in the meeting early, before the server was reset. A full 100 names.

Direct Message me with the names that you can CONFIDENTLY, and beyond any shadow of a doubt remove from this list, and they will be removed. Do not just strike names from the list because you know a guy, or he is active, or he helped with something. Our other infiltrator was active, and moderately well known. This one may not be so obvious.

THE LIST:
<br>Kevin CO<br>Vincent KY<br>Marshall OK☑️<br>Aaron SC<br>James TX<br>George TX<br>Jesse AR☑️<br>Logan NC<br>Johnny ID<br>Wilson CO<br>John VA<br>Ethan OH<br>Ben CO☑️<br>Christopher AL<br>Bryan NV<br>Vincent TX<br>Adam NY<br>Ben MD<br>Adam TX☑️<br>Paul TX☑️<br>Mike RI<br>Lawrence FL<br>Marcus NC<br>Vincent AZ<br>David WA<br>Jesse CO<br>Clarke IL<br>Logan UT<br>Lee KY<br>Carter MO<br>Adam SD<br>Alexander PA<br>John MN<br>Cecil OK☑️<br>Francis MI<br>John WA☑️<br>Alexander OR<br>Vincent VA<br>Hugh AL<br>Alan MI<br>William TX☑️<br>Sam OH<br>Randolph IL<br>Johnny MN<br>Sam MN<br>Rex VT☑️<br>Logan TX<br>Ryan OH<br>Jack AZ<br>Eric PA☑️<br>Sean KS<br>Mark PA<br>Eric MI<br>Zach MO<br>Nicholas OH<br>Steven TX<br>Patrick TX☑️<br>Gabriel IA<br>Sam MI<br>Michael IN<br>Austin TX<br>Logan CA<br>Adam PA<br>Wilson TX<br>Frederick OR<br>Oscar TX<br>Gabriel WV<br>Nick NY<br>Benjamin MI<br>Jason NY☑️<br>Patrick NC<br>Andrew WY<br>Billy TX<br>Ulysses FL<br>Leo MO<br>Josh NH<br>Marcus WA<br>Wayne NY<br>Jeffrey OH<br>Walter OR<br>Daniel TX<br>Robert NJ☑️<br>Nathan TX<br>Christopher VA<br>Matthew MN<br>Benjamin OH<br>James UT<br>James AL<br>Robert IL<br>Sean AL<br>Ryan PA☑️<br>Jesse GA<br>Jon UT☑️<br>Brian NC<br>Clarke OK☑️<br>Peter MN<br>Grant MD☑️<br>Jason TX☑️<br>Adam IN<br>Oscar ID<br>Josh CA<br>Tyler CT<br>Norman GA<br>Robert IN<br>

@all

Do not add anything to the existing list.

Direct message me a list of names that you believe should NOT be on the larger list.

DM should be in the following format:
Name XX
Name XX
Name XX
Name XX

Do this now, please.

@all *This is the proper format to be Direct Messaged to me.
https://pf3618.bloodandsoil.org/direct/n8Hnfj4Hze86xAjyfvTdDxqJeF5PK8Twnt?msg=z33KHHvPoHvwujZCh

Vincent KY is one of my coworkers. He is legit.

@all Scratch the list method. We've got other leads.

Everyone who has used the new vetting methods, please cite your experiences thus far. @ND - Eric PA @ND - Jon UT @ND - Carter MO

I have several vettings to fulfill this week, should I wait until those are done for a more comprehensive analysis?

I’ll get on that today. I have more vettings to fulfill this week so I will give another report when those are done

@ND - Eric PA Very good. Thank you.

Josh UT, Anthony UT, and I will be also be conducting another view today

I have another lined up for tomorrow as well

Very good. Are those your two sanctioned vetters aside yourself?

yes

Floyd, Anthony, and Josh have all reviewed the meeting intermediates document and I believe them all to be good judges of character and capable of conducting in person interviews.

Conducted an interview last night with the new vetting methods, interviewee was receptive to having us go through his phone and expressed support for the idea. Granted this interviewee was in PF previously and joined us for the DC event as an unaffiliate so I had no doubts about him. Three more interviews to do out here

@Thomas when we see people mentioning the recent award ceremony audio leak do we have permission to mention this was part of an ongoing investigation and that the leak was fully anticipated?

I would guess not since it is an ongoing investigation but thought I'd have you specify clearly what our orders are

@ND - Ben CO Very good. Keep up the standards and.

@ND - Samuel VA When you say people, do you mean members or what?

@all

MUMBLE IS DOWN FOR SERVER UPDATES AND SECURITY CHECKS
It will be back up in a couple hours at most when everything is up to speed. Edited instructions will be at victory.patriotfront.us

@Thomas pool party members in this specific case, but generally applied to non-organization/ adjacent community members

I refrain from discussing it with anyone not in a leadership role frankly, so as not to enable gossip

Im not discussing it; it's being discussed because there's a link to audio of our meeting

The question here is if I should do any proactive damage control or just let the rumors take their course

Not worth discussing with others in a positive or negative light.

@Thomas just got done vetting another interviewee

would you like me to submit another full debrief?

Full enough to get the picture. @ND - Jon UT

Understood

@ND - Lawrence FL I am going to reactivate Paul FL's account. As soon as he's in I want you to schedule a meetup with him and put him under a microscope.

Ok, sounds good. Him and I went a vetted the interviewee today. Using the new method worked well enough. He was taken aback by how "thorough you guys are." Our interviewee seems to be all good except for his twitter which seems to be exclusively in Japanese. He has an anime pfp, and I refrained from clicking any of the accounts he follows. He embraasiny described it as being "coomer stuff." Despite that, I think he will be a good fit. Plus, this will likely be a huge wakeup call to cut the coom.

If you're really okay with another personal improvement project, and as long as you're certain he is not a security risk.

I'm ok with it, we have been very sucessful with Ryan as of late. I myself was an addict for a decade so I'm always happy to help others along.

Like you said, this org is the last positive force in most peoples lives. It certainly has been for me.

@Thomas Anthony and I approached the interviewee with caution. Recognized him immediately given the description he gave us before hand, we followed the meeting intermediates protocols having him turn out his pockets and open his phone. All of the channels he followed were very typical for someone in our line of politics. Western chau, NJP, WLM, Striker, Warren etc. nothing alarming. He was extremely timid and quiet at first due to being nervous and it showed. However once we got him to start talking he expressed his beliefs and they are very much in line with our own. I had to press him a bit on political ideology because he was nervous about saying it out loud in a public setting but he seems to have understood that we were coming from a place of good faith and described in detail that “we of European stock are quickly becoming a minority in our own homelands and that this isn’t an environment that isn’t an environment I wish to raise my children in.” After touching on a few other ideological subjects, mainly on how he views others we went out and conducted activism. He put up two stickers and Floyd put up the rest. I showed him how to take photos and remain inconspicuous. Overall I believe he would make a good addition to my network given his background in martial arts and his motivation to do activism.

@ND - Lawrence FL Affirmative. Give me the Intermediate's User ID.

@ND - Jon UT Very good. Give me the Intermediate's User ID.

Interviewee-576300

@Thomas are you holding off on adding him and 599797 because you are going to add a whole bunch to the server?

I have quite a few in the process of being assigned accounts.

copy

@ND - Christopher AL Who from GA/AL will NOT be in the new NW boundaries I sent you for review (if any)?

:joy: :sunglasses:

Always waiting for Jon… smh

@all REMINDER: DM me any User ID codes for Intermediates to be added. Again, if there is any delay. Many/all of them are currently in the conversation process to be added.

Yesterday’s interview went well. No problems finding the interviewee, as he informed me beforehand what he was wearing. Conducted phone search and observation of attire. I had reviewed the application with Jackson PA beforehand, and used this to ask him to elaborate on many answers, mostly his red pill story and his experiences in the army, gaining some more insight into how he came to where he’s at now. He is accustomed to a nationalist setting from experiences in the pool party, so from there he went off about his ideals in casual conversation. I reviewed his availability and showed him how to put up stickers, then described the relevant features of the server for posting sticker photos. I think he will be a good addition to the organization, he knows how to conduct himself well in communities like ours, and is eager to get out and do something.

Oh I also stressed the importance of attentiveness and communication, as I do with every interviewee

@all somehow these keys were left with me after DC. I have no idea who they belong to if anyone has a member missing vehicle keys pls reach out.

I believe that is the transit bus. The one that no longer exists.

Should probably give those to Carter as a keepsake.

@ND - Carter MO

Yes those are from the Columbia Transit and I'll gladly keep them as a treasured memory. @ND - Samuel VA Thank you for letting me know.

Excuse the late reply @Thomas it's been non-stop meetings on mumble tonight.
A report is due on the interviewees from today and yesterday.

When you can, Carter. No issue.

My pops saw me wearing my Infowars shirt and said “Info…Wars.. is that, that white supremacist hate group or whatever you’re a part of?”

Thoughts & experiences using the updated "Meeting Intermediates" guide.

Since the last event we've received two intermediates in Northern Illinois, and Western Missouri.

#1 Springfield, IL
The first man was over the age limit but an exception was made by @Patrick TX (37). It was conducted with @Sam MN as my wingman

Generally I like to select areas of historical significance since it gives the meeting a special setting. We chose the "Lincoln House" a large area of replica buildings taking up a city block including the actual house Lincoln once lived. The area has many visitors and a picnic bench area near the front. No vehicles are allowed within these replica roads allowing us to peer down the fence line towards the direction of the coordinates I forwarded. Without issue he provided his clothing and vehicle information. He arrived at the exact spot as planned.

Once comfortable he was told to close all applications, he complied. Opening telegram all the channels shown were legitimate with recent / prolonged use. He made no attempts to hide anything on his device at any point of this process and understood our reasoning. The phone placed flat the entire time was deactivated and pockets were to be emptied. The typical contents of keys and wallet laid on the table.

Next the task of removing his coat and lifting all layers underneath was done.. @Sam MN at this time was to be suspicious of anyone approaching the area and to inspect him visually during each step. At any point during the interview if my wingman decides he's not been honest or elaborate enough I've instructed him to press the issue as hard as he sees fit. This intermediate impressed us by the end of the conversation. Very disciplined, honest, and positive in his messaging. The next interview was not as easy.

#2 Jefferson City, MO
Interview was done with @Sam MN and @Mark MO today. Planning to head west in the early hours of the morning the intermediate was told to confirm the interview on the previous night. He failed in this regard finally sending a message that he had already left at 5:30 am. A note was taken onto the script before the meeting questioning his reliability and reasoning. Once in position at the park fully concealed behind a building the man was forwarded the actual meeting location. Clothing and vehicle information was again provided.

Due to the suspicion of his actions I required Sam and Mark to stay behind eventually exiting the vehicle once I reached the first sidewalk on the far side of the parking lot. The location masked my first position and since there was no guarantee I was a member of Patriot Front a targeted attack would be difficult. Looking ahead the individual wasn't where I asked him to be but the vehicle described was. To my right around 60 ft. was a man sitting on a bench not wearing the "yellow flannel" that I was expecting.

Continuing to walk past him he then identified himself to me, this was done on purpose. Asking why he wasn't at the pavilion he said "I'd rather be in the open" and the person sitting in a car across the lot was making him anxious. My instinct caused an aggressive order to come to the pavilion or the interview will end. He complied and we sat down. We sat down and I read his notes patiently waiting for my wingmen to arrive. His nerves were shot as they came from behind the position he's facing.

We followed the same protocol as the interview the previous day. We dredged through all of his social media to an excessive degree. All layers of clothing shown and inspected. Cell phone turned off. Due to his actions the interview was an hour and fifteen minutes in length once questioning began. We exited the script over and over drilling into his experiences asking for details that would be almost impossible to consistently make up on the fly. Criticizing his inability to confirm the interview was met with admitting his mistake. His nervous attitude at the beginning was brought to light, he was absolutely scared. Noticing the yellow flannel under his jacket explained the clothing mix-up. This interview was unique in the way it became close to an interrogation at certain points. The decision was made that he was a legitimate applicant between the three of us.

Conclusion:
The new interview procedures are necessary. They're useful in protecting the recruiters and in the way it can make a person react. When someone cannot provide any media on their phone or refuses a single step then we've protected the entire organization from a potential threat. If the previous interview had one single red flag on his phone it would have ended instantly. I'll do whatever possible to keep infiltrators out and hope this report can assist others for upcoming interviewees. @Thomas

Thoughts & experiences using the updated "Meeting Intermediates" guide.

Since the last event we've received two intermediates in Northern Illinois, and Western Missouri.

#1 Springfield, IL
The first man was over the age limit but an exception was made by @Patrick TX (37). It was conducted with @Sam MN as my wingman.

Generally I like to select areas of historical significance since it gives the meeting a special setting. We chose the "Lincoln House" a large area of replica buildings taking up a city block including the actual house Lincoln once lived. The area has many visitors and a picnic bench area near the front. No vehicles are allowed within these replica roads allowing us to peer down the fence line towards the direction of the coordinates I forwarded. Without issue he provided his clothing and vehicle information. He arrived at the exact spot as planned.

Once comfortable he was told to close all applications, he complied. Opening telegram all the channels shown were legitimate with recent / prolonged use. He made no attempts to hide anything on his device at any point of this process and understood our reasoning. The phone placed flat the entire time was deactivated and pockets were to be emptied. The typical contents of keys and wallet laid on the table.

Next the task of removing his coat and lifting all layers underneath was done.. @Sam MN at this time was to be suspicious of anyone approaching the area and to inspect him visually during each step. At any point during the interview if my wingman decides he's not been honest or elaborate enough I've instructed him to press the issue as hard as he sees fit. This intermediate impressed us by the end of the conversation. Very disciplined, honest, and positive in his messaging. The next interview was not as easy.

#2 Jefferson City, MO
Interview was done with @Sam MN and @Mark MO today. Planning to head west in the early hours of the morning the intermediate was told to confirm the interview on the previous night. He failed in this regard finally sending a message that he had already left at 5:30 am. A note was taken onto the script before the meeting questioning his reliability and reasoning. Once in position at the park fully concealed behind a building the man was forwarded the actual meeting location. Clothing and vehicle information was again provided.

Due to the suspicion of his actions I required Sam and Mark to stay behind eventually exiting the vehicle once I reached the first sidewalk on the far side of the parking lot. The location masked my first position and since there was no guarantee I was a member of Patriot Front a targeted attack would be difficult. Looking ahead the individual wasn't where I asked him to be but the vehicle described was. To my right around 60 ft. was a man sitting on a bench not wearing the "yellow flannel" that I was expecting.

Continuing to walk past him he then identified himself to me, this was done on purpose. Asking why he wasn't at the pavilion he said "I'd rather be in the open" and the person sitting in a car across the lot was making him anxious. My instinct caused an aggressive order to come to the pavilion or the interview will end. He complied and we sat down.I read his notes patiently waiting for my wingmen to arrive. His nerves were shot as they came from behind the position he's facing.

We followed the same protocol as the interview the previous day. We dredged through all of his social media to an excessive degree. All layers of clothing shown and inspected. Cell phone turned off. Due to his actions the interview was an hour and fifteen minutes in length once questioning began. We exited the script over and over drilling into his experiences asking for details that would be almost impossible to consistently make up on the fly. Criticizing his inability to confirm the interview was met with admitting his mistake. His nervous attitude at the beginning was brought to light, he was absolutely scared. Noticing the yellow flannel under his jacket explained the clothing mix-up. This interview was unique in the way it became close to an interrogation at certain points. The decision was made that he was a legitimate applicant between the three of us.

Conclusion:
The new interview procedures are necessary. They're useful in protecting the recruiters and in the way it can make a person react. When someone cannot provide any media on their phone or refuses a single step then we've protected the entire organization from a potential threat. If the previous interview had one single red flag on his phone it would have ended instantly. I'll do whatever possible to keep infiltrators out and hope this report can assist others for upcoming interviewees. @Thomas

It’s looking like Jesse GA is missing it by two counties south...dammit.

@ND - Christopher AL If that's the case I can edit it, and send it back. Just DM me which county(s) in particular.