Message from @Whitey
Discord ID: 410444416382271499
The collective may be 'created' as you say but it exists becasue people act like one.
Another example from the ever on top of Father Ted
He offends Asians, which then results in all asians on the island taking offence. Therby acting as a collective and being imune to what a lite joke, also showing that collectives can have similar traits like being humourless unless and the 'whites' expence (see bar scene in same episode)
It's still individuals taking offense. It's also not that irrational if ted is insulting traits that they all share or denigrating all people who belong to that group
"A society can be reduced to the level of cooperating (or not cooperating in the case of socialist societies) individuals."
so if a group of cooperating individuals choose to suspend the rights of a non-cooperating individual...? 🤔
FUCK GOOKS KILL ALL CHINKI NIP SCUM
Do you mean gooks as a collective?
dont be ridiculous
individual gooks act as members of a greater hivemind
similar to Jesus's role in the holy trinity
In the same way insulting Christ is personally offensive to the holy spirit, insulting gooks is offensive to the chink hivemind
Individuals become collective take this scene from monty python French v English
There's no great confusion there. You just don't have a high enough iq to understand. There's nothing inconsistent with individualism about punishing individuals who violate a shared agreement among individuals to obey certain rules or face certain consequences
Individuals make up collectives and so in ways that have been blinded to me you seem to have a point John
Explaining using Gooks makes it understandable
I suppose their hive mind while maybe a collective it then demands them to act as indivduals and take over the media and large businesses
I am sorry for wasting your time discussing such an ignorant person as I was.
Now I will examine gooks acts on their on merits and not leep to blame them all for acts of some
John is woke af on the gook question
maybe your IQ is too high for you to realise my original point still stands that you have no choice but to live in a collective
and can maybe renegotiate the terms of your social contract, but the contract is imposed upon you
That's like saying the grass is green. It's not an argument for socialist policies
oh but it is
how do you distribute land such that everyone has the opportunity to own a home
you can't have indefinite property ownership
you can't own land as a corpse
you have a right to 50 years burial in the UK
you pay council tax for a right to stay on your land
you pay capital gains tax
understanding there are limits at which point putting your rights before those of everyone else becomes a problem is just being realistic
understanding there are hierarchies of rights is being realistic
although that wasn't the original point now, was it
"People consent to the legal structure at the start"
"Uh yeah obviously the collective oppressed people. That's why I'm against all forms of collectivism, including socialism and socialized healthcare"
"Not in a libertarian society where everyone consents to the law (for children implied consent until they can make their own choices) if you don't consent you can leave"
and my point has been, and will remain to be:
"you don't get a choice"
Why are you against socialized healthcare?
Isn't it better to pay slightly more taxes for healthcare than to pay for private healthcare?
Where the hell do you live