It's still individuals taking offense. It's also not that irrational if ted is insulting traits that they all share or denigrating all people who belong to that group

"A society can be reduced to the level of cooperating (or not cooperating in the case of socialist societies) individuals."

so if a group of cooperating individuals choose to suspend the rights of a non-cooperating individual...? 🤔

FUCK GOOKS KILL ALL CHINKI NIP SCUM

Do you mean gooks as a collective?

dont be ridiculous

individual gooks act as members of a greater hivemind

similar to Jesus's role in the holy trinity

In the same way insulting Christ is personally offensive to the holy spirit, insulting gooks is offensive to the chink hivemind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGXx56WqqJw

Individuals become collective take this scene from monty python French v English

There's no great confusion there. You just don't have a high enough iq to understand. There's nothing inconsistent with individualism about punishing individuals who violate a shared agreement among individuals to obey certain rules or face certain consequences

Individuals make up collectives and so in ways that have been blinded to me you seem to have a point John

Explaining using Gooks makes it understandable

I suppose their hive mind while maybe a collective it then demands them to act as indivduals and take over the media and large businesses

I am sorry for wasting your time discussing such an ignorant person as I was.

Now I will examine gooks acts on their on merits and not leep to blame them all for acts of some

woke ^

John is woke af on the gook question

maybe your IQ is too high for you to realise my original point still stands that you have no choice but to live in a collective

and can maybe renegotiate the terms of your social contract, but the contract is imposed upon you

That's like saying the grass is green. It's not an argument for socialist policies

oh but it is

how do you distribute land such that everyone has the opportunity to own a home

for example

you can't have indefinite property ownership

you can't own land as a corpse

you have a right to 50 years burial in the UK

you pay council tax for a right to stay on your land

you pay capital gains tax

understanding there are limits at which point putting your rights before those of everyone else becomes a problem is just being realistic

understanding there are hierarchies of rights is being realistic

although that wasn't the original point now, was it

you said:
"People consent to the legal structure at the start"
"Uh yeah obviously the collective oppressed people. That's why I'm against all forms of collectivism, including socialism and socialized healthcare"
"Not in a libertarian society where everyone consents to the law (for children implied consent until they can make their own choices) if you don't consent you can leave"
and my point has been, and will remain to be:
"you don't get a choice"

Why are you against socialized healthcare?

Isn't it better to pay slightly more taxes for healthcare than to pay for private healthcare?

>slightly more
Where the hell do you live

The US

Over here if you don't have Medicare or Medicaid you will 100% for sure go into debt if you go to the hospital

Unless you make tons of money

"slightly more"
for you