Where is the debate taking place?

Debate VC

^

Debate?

Lmao

Tyty

The chat in this channel is better then the debate imho 🙂 We have said more of relevance then they have

@Frenchinator too

I haven't listened to the debate

It's pretty bad.

tbf we boiled down the core of the argument that took them 25 minutes to get to in less then half a paragraph

people @ me with questions for them

it's very pedantic

It’s boring as hell

another point

Guns are good

I don’t why pius hasn’t brung up the bubble at all in his argument

The bubble?

*bible

Oh

because he's not arguing for the Christian God

This is the problem with trying to scientifically prove that there is God. He is using elaborate words to try to convince someone that doesn’t believe in God

Because theyre talking about proofs for any god

@Theo they've chosen not to debate the character of God at all

he's arguing merely for the God of the gaps argument

Conception in the mental sense is understanding; imagining is creation.

@Spartan322 which technially wins the debate. but is a very pendatic arguement

God exists but not in this terrible way that he is trying to prove.

and doesn't actually say anything

It doesnt

by a technical sense it kind of works, but it means nothing

Oh lol I had them both on Mute. Been here for 10minutes wondering tf going on lmao.

lol

If you accept the premise that something can be infinite, you can just make the universe your infinite. Either that or you have turtles all the way down

How would you prove God is real @lanceleader

An intellectual shouldn’t try to explain God. Never let another man teach you.

You can't debate over.

Thanks power range.r

well I mean it could. it just means that 'god' aka the first mover or contingency is very tiny

tbf arguing for God from the empirical realm won't work because faith is not about empiricism

yeah to be honest I think a better argument is to take God's existence for granted, and argue his character