loving the auto mute

As I see it, there is no way, can't prove a negitive

Former or latter?

like is this gonna be some sort of naturalist debate or something about the mark of divinity?

This whole debate is literally to jerk of egos.

*off

that's not the sort of logical argument that you can have on say, national immigration policy

^

Most of the people on Discord are Believers or Christains etc?

I actually like outlining hypothetical proofs for God. It would have been really easy to do tbh

its a philosphy major vs. what even is FondBoy?

@Peachpanther I don't think so

Where is the debate taking place?

Debate VC

^

Debate?

Lmao

Tyty

The chat in this channel is better then the debate imho 🙂 We have said more of relevance then they have

@Frenchinator too

I haven't listened to the debate

It's pretty bad.

tbf we boiled down the core of the argument that took them 25 minutes to get to in less then half a paragraph

people @ me with questions for them

it's very pedantic

It’s boring as hell

another point

Guns are good

I don’t why pius hasn’t brung up the bubble at all in his argument

The bubble?

*bible

Oh

because he's not arguing for the Christian God

This is the problem with trying to scientifically prove that there is God. He is using elaborate words to try to convince someone that doesn’t believe in God

Because theyre talking about proofs for any god

@Theo they've chosen not to debate the character of God at all

he's arguing merely for the God of the gaps argument

Conception in the mental sense is understanding; imagining is creation.

@Spartan322 which technially wins the debate. but is a very pendatic arguement

God exists but not in this terrible way that he is trying to prove.

and doesn't actually say anything