Message from @Mongo Jongo
Discord ID: 644326863027568661
As I see it, there is no way, can't prove a negitive
Former or latter?
like is this gonna be some sort of naturalist debate or something about the mark of divinity?
This whole debate is literally to jerk of egos.
*off
that's not the sort of logical argument that you can have on say, national immigration policy
^
Most of the people on Discord are Believers or Christains etc?
I actually like outlining hypothetical proofs for God. It would have been really easy to do tbh
its a philosphy major vs. what even is FondBoy?
@Peachpanther I don't think so
Where is the debate taking place?
Debate VC
^
Debate?
Lmao
Tyty
The chat in this channel is better then the debate imho 🙂 We have said more of relevance then they have
I haven't listened to the debate
tbf we boiled down the core of the argument that took them 25 minutes to get to in less then half a paragraph
people @ me with questions for them
it's very pedantic
It’s boring as hell
another point
Guns are good
I don’t why pius hasn’t brung up the bubble at all in his argument
The bubble?
*bible
Oh
because he's not arguing for the Christian God
This is the problem with trying to scientifically prove that there is God. He is using elaborate words to try to convince someone that doesn’t believe in God
Because theyre talking about proofs for any god
he's arguing merely for the God of the gaps argument
Conception in the mental sense is understanding; imagining is creation.
@Spartan322 which technially wins the debate. but is a very pendatic arguement
God exists but not in this terrible way that he is trying to prove.
and doesn't actually say anything
It doesnt