Spartan322
Discord ID: 142400713534734336
115 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next
*inb4 less jewish then regular american*
I don't think she's even that tbh
she doesn't look like she inherited any jewish traits whether physical or mental
if she has any
yeah but that's a very homgenous trait now
basically anyone who's not an idiot probably thinks the same thing
I mean when fake news calls you out for being wrong
it feels a lot like the true racists are the ones that call everyone else racist and say they stand up against racism
wasn't there an instagram thing where a bunch of white girls were kinda pulling a shaun king implictly and the left demonized them for it or something?
fair enough
they eat their own
bio-lenism is so dumb, the communists are just gonna execute them once they are given the power anyway
too much social trouble to keep people in line keeping them alive
yeah
its just like
some random dude 20 years ago: "fag"
random idiots now: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
these heretic degenerates should be purged in holy fire
yeah, weird
as weird as wiring a some thousands of dollars to anyone who opposes Trump
IDK, I've been here a while but never particpated on this server
a usual sunday for me then
anyone hear of the texas protestors teaching people about jury nullification regarding second amendment restriction laws?
anyone else email local reps for opposition to william barr
also william barr is anti-gun
he was talking about force implementing red flag laws on a federal level
actually
doesn't that make generation z way more conservative then other more recent generations when fixed for age?
yeah
but the thing is that even so, you expect young people to be fairly socially liberal within the past 3 generations
but they're already less liberal in many ways compared to millienals now
socially liberal I mean
yeah not in every case
but this research is kinda refuting its own argument with a little bit of thought
like we need to remember that the conservative age shift happens after 20s, so I expect them to become way less liberal within the next decade
they have
just not nearly enough
iirc gen z is already outperforming millennials statistically too
don't quote me on that tho
its a fairly small sample size that could easily be influenced by area of survey
and of course even if its true, it still says that they're only just as bad as millennials are now
tbh, if they were worse off then millennials, I'd expect them to be well further gone then millennials are now, not at the same level
yeah
that's another point
people sometimes will outright choose the option they disagree with just to prevent the antifa mobs
especially if the area is stereotypically a social liberal area
yeah
I gotta agree with shadows, high likelyhood none of them actually give a shit and were just saying it as avoidant bs
GOA is really opposing Barr
and their reasoning isn't bad
in the collesum
and I'm pretty certain I know how this debate is gonna go even before the finishing of Pius' summary
the majority of the subject is beyond scope and its gonna lead on the subject
its also (currently) entirely based on specific interpretations of a variable theory
which isn't definitively known or defined
I'm a little dejected, I was hoping this would be more specific and definitive
I still am willing to try and propose a ponder on the subject later on or post-debate/post-QA, but anything I'll end up saying would probably break the discussion
partly, but the bigger issue is broken theologic foundation
you can't argue this unless you have a definite form for the subject which just to point out is by definition of omnipetence impossible
thus humanistic reason can not achieve a definitive nor reasonable explaination regarding some god or the God
man would not believe no matter the proof
but you'll always get stuck on what created those beings
which becomes circular
if its omnipetent then you still can't explain its existence through humanistic reason
just to point out that's not true, at least for Christian Theologians
its a problem of poor understanding of non-supernaturalists
and bad theologic understanding
this is gonna be rephrased 6 times before somebody says enough
and the argument itself will never change
this isn't the reason I state you can't argue to God
but it is an example of the problem
to point out from a theologic foundation you can't engage the mind to God either
its a God of the gaps argument which is theortical
the only manner in which you can actually confirm God is through theological foundation arguing in a moral base, a philosphy of God will never actually definitively confirm a god
because you have to define God existing first
this is a very stripped down form of evidencial apolgetics through philosphy
tho if it was an actual evidencial apolgetics argument then at least it be somewhat fun
granted they still suck
that's a churlish attempt in fuility
its a philosphy major vs. what even is FondBoy?
Debate VC
tbf we boiled down the core of the argument that took them 25 minutes to get to in less then half a paragraph
another point
because he's not arguing for the Christian God
he's arguing merely for the God of the gaps argument
and doesn't actually say anything
by a technical sense it kind of works, but it means nothing
tbf arguing for God from the empirical realm won't work because faith is not about empiricism
and without knowing his character makes it double pointless
anyone even have a question? I don't, this is better left as a discussion and anything I ask will be out of scope
plus it'll just be leading the discussion later
I would never try to rationalize God or his character because 1) its futile 2) it won't help man actually incorporate faith
ah
115 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next