they just got yeeted

they mentioned they who shall not be named.

*Deep State Joined the Chat*

@spacepan no. they mentioned the name of the whistleblower.

it may be back on YT

isn't this argument a rather god of the gaps argument? which is a very safe but pointless point to hold?

as literally zero religions in existence argue that all their god did was be the first observer.

and @Mongo Jongo yeah this is a very academic discussion

this is just Pius word salading around Spader. pretty lame. he is defending the most minimalist form of god. which I'll grant does satisfy the statement but is a pretty semantic and kinda lame one.

also the default position is that something doesn't exist and that position must be refuted not proven.

I will grant that.

^^

@Spartan322 which technially wins the debate. but is a very pendatic arguement

well I mean it could. it just means that 'god' aka the first mover or contingency is very tiny

And so tiny that it practically doesn't matter

same. I just feel like Pius is arguing a very pendantic point and I am not read up on the minusca of metaphysics

so anything I ask is going to irrelevent being more practically minded.

That question is a whole can of worms way beyond the scope of the debate

@lanceleader thats a whole realm of philsophical debate which does not yet have a definitive answer.