Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 644327251545948183
@Peachpanther I don't think so
Where is the debate taking place?
Debate VC
^
Debate?
Lmao
Tyty
The chat in this channel is better then the debate imho 🙂 We have said more of relevance then they have
I haven't listened to the debate
It's pretty bad.
tbf we boiled down the core of the argument that took them 25 minutes to get to in less then half a paragraph
people @ me with questions for them
it's very pedantic
It’s boring as hell
another point
Guns are good
I don’t why pius hasn’t brung up the bubble at all in his argument
The bubble?
*bible
because he's not arguing for the Christian God
This is the problem with trying to scientifically prove that there is God. He is using elaborate words to try to convince someone that doesn’t believe in God
Because theyre talking about proofs for any god
he's arguing merely for the God of the gaps argument
Conception in the mental sense is understanding; imagining is creation.
@Spartan322 which technially wins the debate. but is a very pendatic arguement
God exists but not in this terrible way that he is trying to prove.
and doesn't actually say anything
It doesnt
by a technical sense it kind of works, but it means nothing
Oh lol I had them both on Mute. Been here for 10minutes wondering tf going on lmao.
lol
If you accept the premise that something can be infinite, you can just make the universe your infinite. Either that or you have turtles all the way down
How would you prove God is real @lanceleader
An intellectual shouldn’t try to explain God. Never let another man teach you.
You can't debate over.
Thanks power range.r
well I mean it could. it just means that 'god' aka the first mover or contingency is very tiny
tbf arguing for God from the empirical realm won't work because faith is not about empiricism