Message from @Thomas Ryan
Discord ID: 402565358952644608
They had actual meaning in their life, not something fed to them by capitalist Jewish
@southland That's good, but gotta make sure all able-bodied young American men get out in the streets and fight for these communities' right to exist.
Let's hope they give us more coverage.
If you raise your sons to believe in the American struggle, they will fight.
I like how she poster a link to the org too. I drove by the postering site today, i feel like an arsonist going back to the scene to hear the investigators talk about his dastardly deeds 😇
`An American is somebody who has his or her roots in America.`
Vaughn makes a bit of a mistake here, when he says this. He is correct, but he is conflating ancestry with roots. Africans were only ever here as slaves, and even now many believe they still are. They were always an "other", and always will be so long as there is not complete genetic assimilation. They admit this.
`You're going to build a movement that goes around autistically haranguing non-whites for not being American?
Amazing, can't wait to see the results of this movement.`
It's more about ignoring non-Whites, reaching out to Americans and building community and a heightened sense of identity and culture *as Americans.* Then taking the social capital gained from that and putting it to use with public movements and more private internal community building and lifestyle activism. (See: large families, self-sustainability, etc.)
`Ethnic identity a very strong foundation. Racial identity, not so much.`
`A good foundation is strong, local groups who have coherent identities, and what binds all the local groups together is national identity.`
He's exactly right, but misses the fact that the true and constant goal of America throughout the centuries has been to create a new ethnic identity which will form a national identity. Americans are not singularly one Euro ethnicity anymore, and beyond that our culture and way of life has long since diverged. You aren't going to convince Americans that they're in the same civilizational struggle as Ukrainians or Latvians or Scots, not without already having power.
To be honest, the idea that there's going to be a ***Hurrah!*** moment of siezing power and then all the non-Whites will be killed or deported or whatever is pretty fanciful. I feel like that's his main critique. I've spoken about this before, but it's more about getting the community-based territory of the nation, and then putting that into local government, and then leveraging that into broader approaches. Whether it's a political party gaining right to govern in Congress, or a mass movement of families and communities leaving the large cities and shunning the modern way of life (Not communes, though).
You're likely going to end up looking at an Aparthied style situation, either brought on by freedom of association or federal loss of legitimacy, can't say what the percentages will be, but you'll get to a certain state of agressive civic nationalism in the sense that you're going to need something that works in the transitory phase until demographic balance is achieved, which will take a couple generations conservatively.
I finally got suspended from twitter for calling will wheaton a “gay nigger faggot”
Yeah wheaton reports everything
>when people look right over your effort posts meant to inspire a good discussion
I read it all 😉
It seems the only arguments these guys have against it is "what if"
He makes a point about Africans that have put down roots here but I don't think a lot of black people think that way
they think of themselves as Africans or alternative americans
To be American is to be white, and I think most non whites see it that way
The label is kind of secondary, but they are most definitely an "other". Are you going to convince them to leave? Maybe not, because they know that living under an American welfare system is going to give them a better standard of living than anywhere else.
However, can you make Americans not legally need to associate with them? Yes. Can you not endorse their culture over that of Americans? Yes. Can you socially discourage mixing between the two populations? Yes. Can you make it so that they aren't financially better off by having tons more children? Yes. Will that effectively solve the problem over time? Yes.
@Thomas Ryan you nuked the chat last time I sat down to read your effort posts
Found a dope adams quote
Tldr: the american constitution can't govern a decadent people
DFW will be doing bigger banners.
`Lmao, American Fascism can't exist, because America isn't a nation, it's always been a degenerate soulless Mason imperium. Read SIEGE, faggots.`
a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory.
Alright, large aggreagate, check. People, check. United by common descent, check. History shared? Check. Culture? Recently removed, but check. Language? Check. Inhabiting a territory? Check.
"But should the People of America, once become capable of that deep, simulation towards one another and towards foreign nations, which assumes the Language of Justice and moderation while it is practicing Iniquity and Extravagance; and displays in the most captivating manner the charming Pictures of Candour frankness & sincerity while it is rioting in rapine and Insolence: this Country will be the most miserable Habitation in the World. Because We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. "
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
Thanks for linking these.
Yeah nation, natus, native, nativity are all words rooted in the idea of birth and descent
Like and retweet my dudes.
We gotta get dat reach this month