Shoulda been eu 😮

Eh, the British Empire encompasses two thirds of the world anyway, soon to be more

This is why we need a plague

https://www.rt.com/news/469124-climate-sins-religion-greta-nbc/

The Great Cult expands!

(And the idiots who perpetuate are still to blind to see)

My confession: I farted in january of 2004

```With the movement’s Joan of Arc Greta Thunberg in the lead – seriously, mainstream publications are unironically calling her Joan of Arc – children worldwide are mounting what some have termed a crusade```

Well, the last children's crusade ended well, so why not

Greta Thunberg is child abuse

>complaining about climate change
>doesn’t do jackshit about ching chong countries and their factories

idk seems extremely retarded if that’s what they’re going for

also let’s get this epic cult victory royale

Well she can't preach in China because they already have a cult there

They also aren't too keen on the mentally handicapped

the Cult of climate change is ready to launch a new virtue signalling crusade

Any new and exciting betrayals today?

Give it time

There is an article in the telegraph about how British institutions have been so damage by brexit that we should think of total reform.
Like a written constitution.

Which I halfway agree with. PM’s have proven that they have no respect for the unwritten rules they are expected to follow the spirit of.
But on the other hand the idea that no parliament can bind the hands of its successors is also something I agree with

I notice trudeau is not trending

if it was trump or boris it would be trending for a week

at least

trump would probably be impeached

A written constitution would be horrible.

@Hiddenhope Well ... we do have a written constitution here in Germany ... and the politicians are ignoring that one as well, because far too many of them are lawyers or lawyer-minded and are "using the letter of the law to defeat the spirit of the law." In theory it is ILLEGAL for Germany to be a member of the EU, because that organisation has the end goal of "ending the sovereignty of Germany", which doesnt mix with §20(2) "All state authority is derived from the people." ... which includes the creation of laws, but if politicians we didnt vote for are writing them it is against that article.

http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html#p0114

In theory we have "the right to resist" ... but I doubt judges would see this as a valid excuse.

the USSR had a constitution

"Article 50. In accordance with the interests of the people and in order to strengthen and develop the socialist system, citizens of the USSR are guaranteed freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly, meetings, street processions and demonstrations. Exercise of these political freedoms is ensured by putting public buildings, streets and squares at the disposal of the working people and their organisations, by broad dissemination of information, and by the opportunity to use the press, television, and radio."

tl;dr ... written laws arent safer because politicians will still circumvent/abuse them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Et1-T32FFY

Ch4 has the comments turned off

sigh!

They probably still remember the "Cathy Newman vs. Jordan Peterson" desaster ... and dont want to pay moderators to delete comments.

Reminder the supreme court will vote the prorogation legal.

"Article 57. Respect for the individual and protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens are the duty of all state bodies, public organisations, and officials. Citizens of the USSR have the right to protection by the courts against encroachments on their honour and reputation, life and health, and personal freedom and property."

USSR just simply redefines what property means 😛

The one really great thing in our german constituion is THE RIGHT TO RESIST ... which was added to protect the country from "changing the system" by a dictator. Every german is empowered to "resist", although it isnt stated HOW. This bit is something you should make sure to be included if you get a written constitution for Britain.

We'll be sure to word it better.

@wacka Well ... there is probably another article which allows the state to take your property ... and if you dont have any the state doesnt need to protect it again.

"Article 61. Citizens of the USSR are obliged to preserve and protect socialist property. It is the duty of a citizen of the USSR to combat misappropriation and squandering of state and socially-owned property and to make thrifty use of the people's wealth. Persons encroaching in any way on socialist property shall be punished according to the law"