@Literally Gilda Do some stuff for the next DnD stream! What's the worse that can happen?

@Literally Gilda All of that. All of it.

nice

I don't know what you're drawing, but it looks hella cool

and robots?

@CrazyAceKing Nice

@13thprotector Also nice.

Some real nice art there guys.

No problem dude.

Keep it up!

There's some real good art here

Keep up the good work guys.

could be worse

could be ms paint

examples?

Of course they can't keep their narratives straight. If they did, you'd be able to figure them out.

Tell so many lies, if the truth does eventually come out, no one will notice.

It's like a DDOS attack on the truth.

Lenin and Trotsky were Jews. Stalin was white. Who gets vilified and who gets enshrined, again?

Was he insane? I've heard this same argument used for both Hitler and Stalin, but besides Hitlers Hypoborean myth shit, I can't recall him being mad, or anything for Stalin.

@Polekov That's because he was losing if I recall

Trotsky was so smart, Stalin just couldn't help but **pick** those brains himself, eh?

meth? Really? I thought that was their troops?

@ManAnimal Sadly, I agree. I see nothing less of a dictator cleaning out London of it's heavily entrenched criminal element.

That will inevitably become terrorist-levels of organised and dangerous, effectively turning our capitol into the fucking middle-east, ethnic *diversity* included

Don't call *right* wing morons npcs, it dilutes the cultural artefact

Create a new word, thus robbing ownership of the word from the marxists and giving it to the rest of us (Liberal, Libertarian, Conservative, Centrist etc.)

That way, when they use the word, it has no impact and reveals their lack of originality (Like when they accuse others of being snowflakes etc.)

Because they must add the addendum of *right-wing* to every artefact they steal, thus weakening their position without even realising it, as it tips the hat to the original source of that word

i.e: Right-wing SJW. Right-wing snowflake. Right-wing npc. etc.

They have to add right-wing as a pre-fix.

Thus revealing their theft and linguistically weakening their position in *any* argument where they use these terms.

Redhead>Blonde>Everything else.

Fuck blondes, marry redheads.

Though I say, one of the absolute nicest girl I've met is a brunette, 1 in a million.

Am I the only one who's seen a trend in racism and redheadedness though? I swear that's a thing.

Some of the most racist people I've met were all redheads.

or black

No. Criticize away but don't dilute cultural artefacts.

This culture war is largely linguistic.

Don't hand that to the fucking marxists.

Just because you want to get mad.

Except by doing that, they re-define language. And win.

They are winning.

Not lol.

That will never happen. As long as you have multiple ethnic/ideological groups in one space, there will be a culture war.

Except these linguistic constructs literally define our culture and how we interpret ourselves within it.

You can't do the right thing if what you consider right, has been edited through linguistic warfare, as now being the *wrongthink*

You make no sense. I mean you.

I know English better than you, since I am literally explaining how they use linguistic warfare, and how they wage it to you.

All you've done is handwave it.

You've dismantled nothing.

You haven't even made an argument.

Still no argument. Just grandstanding over a percieved slight.

What was your argument, then?

@Fuksias Agreed. Marxists are inexhaustible in this regard.

That's not an argument that's a statement of position.

I'm not saying act like the left, not even close.

All I said was don't blur cultural artefacts.

Because cultural artefacts evolve across generations.

And can be easily used to drag the Marxists down.

I'm blind to nothing, you've completely disregarded my point.

Speaking of bruised egos.

Again, ego.

Whether you like it or not, the cultivation of cultural artefacts and their arbiters are integral to the linguistic destruction of Marxism.

You've done little more than play what you accuse others of being.

I have not.

I said not to blur cultural artefacts.

You posted nothing of the sort, you posted your own words.

I don't understand the hostility. I've tried to explain the sheer importance of cultural artefacts and how they can be used to easily trip up Marxists.

Which means not to blur them.

I am trying to be helpful, genuinely.

If I have offended I am sorry.

I mean only to help.

Ignorance of nothing. You accused me of possessing a bruised ego, so I pointed out your own.

This argument is pointless, you have chosen to be offended by something that is useful for us.

It's why the conservative party is derided as being pseudo-left

Actual right wingers would get eaten alive here.

@Vir is the result of the leader being arrested on trumped up charges and receiving constant harrasment

If I recall, one of the original dates for the English yellow vest march was cancelled then another group did a pro-immigrant, anti-nazi parade that same day.

It's painfully hypocritical that the same people who absolve terrorists of their crimes, look at someone like Tommy and state "Once a criminal, always a criminal"

Britain has three inevitable outcomes, none of them my preference. Nativistic Fascism. Islamification and native genocide or globalism and native genocide.

Real talk, how are we going to stop the genocide of native English/Scottish/Welsh etc.? Because *more kids* won't work. Kids require money, you're taxed to the hilt and your money is flowing freely to non-native families to breed like mad.

What else to call it?

A piece of paper is only as real as the fist behind it.

I'd argue there is a motive, it couldn't happen without a motive. Ethnic groups don't just depopulate for no reason.

White's don't need to be herded into camps. Supremacist jews have their wants and the globalists who see you like cattle have theirs.

^

Hardly. They want cattle that's easier to put to work.

birthrates may have risen, but how many saw adulthood?

>Meet the browns with violence.
They're as much cattle as you are.

I will not bring violence to those who are merely pawns, ***especially when they can become allies***

no. you jewpill them.

Literally double manpower.

Muslims are the problem. Somalis and two other African countries too.

Indians contribute considerably.

Having Ghurkhas and Sikhs would be incredibly useful.

They know exactly what Islam is like.

and have combated it