Message from @whiic

Discord ID: 621291266629435402


2019-09-11 03:08:34 UTC  

edgy enough to cut him on the words alone

2019-09-11 03:17:53 UTC  

🔪 🗡 🍴

2019-09-11 07:57:06 UTC  

LMAO

2019-09-11 08:32:18 UTC  

Hey @whiic

2019-09-11 08:32:47 UTC  

D-d-d-do I an-n-n-annoy you wi-wi-with my st-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-uttt-t-tering?

2019-09-11 08:33:23 UTC  

D-d-oes it mmm-mm-m-mmm-.-mmmake you want me de-de-de-dead?

2019-09-11 08:35:08 UTC  

Hey @whiic if I [censored] and I keep [censored] will you want me [censored] ?

2019-09-11 08:36:47 UTC  

If....... I.............. talk........................ very.............................slooow...............like...........this.........does.........that...........make you................very.............annoyed............and.........wish........................death......................................on...................me?

2019-09-11 08:52:27 UTC  

I don't think it's worth it, I just ignore High On Beard Oil Hambly entirely. He's just not worth the time.

2019-09-11 09:24:08 UTC  

I desire to slap Jeremy around with a large trout for his clickbait titles.

2019-09-11 09:24:13 UTC  

But that's aboot it

2019-09-11 09:27:13 UTC  

Out of curiousity, has anyone here ever seen a single pro no deal, or even pro brexit, article from the BBC? Thinking back I cannot think of a single time they entertained the other side

2019-09-11 10:00:34 UTC  

Never

2019-09-11 10:00:52 UTC  

They report reality and fact, Brexit will be damaging to us. Why would they lie about that? @Jackula

2019-09-11 10:03:57 UTC  

What ‘pro Brexit’ articles do you want them to release?

2019-09-11 10:04:21 UTC  

Don’t forget the BBC do not write opinion pieces, they only post fact.

2019-09-11 10:04:25 UTC  

Which they have been doing.

2019-09-11 10:11:14 UTC  

open wide for the BBC

2019-09-11 10:28:43 UTC  

"Why don't you just pay the terrorists?" -Vee

2019-09-11 10:29:17 UTC  

Maybe Mitch said that same retarded shit as well, suggesting vegans could buy the animals to save them.

2019-09-11 10:29:40 UTC  

...not understanding that buying the animals gives the farmers money to buy two new ones to torture.

2019-09-11 10:30:27 UTC  

It is same as funding terrorists. When you pay random to get a person free, the use it to kidnap ten more and demand money for them as well. Happens all the time.

2019-09-11 10:31:37 UTC  

And I ain't unironically calling farmers terrorists, but from vegan point of view, they are. So why pay the terrorist? Why would **a vegan** purchase the animal to be free'd?

2019-09-11 10:33:58 UTC  

The fact that Hindus may purchase cows and set up sanctuaries for them is only an example of lack of principle Hindus have. And it's not limited to cow sanctuaries, they buy leather products and meat from Muslims, etc. they just refuse to kill animals themselves. It's the ultimate NIMBY hypocrisy. They refuse to kill an animal, they pay other people to do it for them, pretending they weren't the financial motivation behind the murder of the cow.

2019-09-11 10:34:52 UTC  

Vegans more principled than Hindus.

2019-09-11 10:44:28 UTC  

@whiic i like how you turned commentary on paying terrorists into anti-hindu nonsense

2019-09-11 10:45:23 UTC  

@whiic are you that faggot from the city slickers movie who took the cow home as his wife in the end?

2019-09-11 10:52:06 UTC  

Well, Hindus, these cow-protecting good people, they pay other people to kill the animals the "protect" because they don't want to get punished for killing the holy holy animal. They pay others to kill, then then eat and wear their skin on their shoes. To me, that's a fucking hypocrisy.

2019-09-11 10:53:21 UTC  

It's like saying USA did nothing wrong, they paid Private Military Companies to fight in Middle-East.

2019-09-11 10:53:22 UTC  

Can I buy a terrorist to torture?

2019-09-11 11:21:12 UTC  

> ``[11:04] Weez: Don’t forget the BBC do not write opinion pieces, they only post fact.``
<:GWchadMEGATHINK:366999806343774218> boi

2019-09-11 11:22:21 UTC  

fucking volcano take

2019-09-11 11:26:19 UTC  

right after dank's video on their obvious-as-fuck hit-docu on him, too

2019-09-11 11:26:41 UTC  

If that was a hit piece they succeeded

2019-09-11 11:26:45 UTC  

In hitting their own reputation

2019-09-11 11:26:54 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-09-11 11:27:00 UTC  

the bbc have no reputation here to begin with

2019-09-11 11:27:18 UTC  

but it's plainly obvious as to why they did it

2019-09-11 11:28:09 UTC  

I mean

2019-09-11 11:28:26 UTC  

They found the absolute worst comedian to represent their side of the argument then

2019-09-11 11:28:36 UTC  

How stupid must they be if they don't get that right