Message from @Jacob
Discord ID: 503781597078880256
I am chronically blackpilled but this week has me very proud of this group and driven to help it.
Based and blackpilled as well
Reality is blackpilling, that's why we're radicals
Radical white pillars.
Radical..narly..cool.
That's a good talking point but in the current political reality we are radicals
@Jacob I think what we do is perfect. Just more. More people, more locations, more often, mpre refined. I know that sounds like a cop out, but IE's potential is nowhere near reached. Post lawsuit (financial redirection of those legal costs back into the org) and double membership will make us a positive force unseen seen for decades.
Very based conservatives.
My prescription is for Euromericans to be openly ourselves and unashamed of it. Those "optics" are only bad for those who hate us. Let the moderate right see that being a coward is worse optics.
I love being white.
Being clean-cut and knowing what one is talking about makes for the best optics.
It's not just a privilege, it's an honor.
same
always be whiter than you were the day before <:usinnoodle:420778112226164736>
Lol
i just get really pink <:sad:366743316475281408>
>lives in CA
yeah that checks out
I was just born not white
only the irish are black...
<:teehee:381917632359563264>
@Nemets so finding out who is energized to vote seems to be more important than measuring the actual public opinion?
There's another important factor in that
It depends how much people care about a certain issue
So, they might be voting, but voting based on a different issue
@Nemets nice. I just joined my state GOP's capitol club so I can hobnob with big wigs
Trump's core ideas were popular. Most leftists even admit they mainly hate him as a person
When it comes to polling on immigration, it's usually very biased. Few people will say "immigrants are bad" but, if you let them pick out the number we should take in, a majority want immigration cut by more than half
good tip!
Let's say that 100% of people are socialists, and there's two parties. One of them is socialist, and one of them is capitalist. The capitalist party is anti-immigration, and the socialist party is pro-immigration. If you're a socialist but you *really* don't like immigration, you'll still vote for the capitalist party, since that's the issue you're voting based on.
It also depends how much a particular side cares about a particular issue. Let's say 10% of the population is anti-immigration, and *really* hates immigration, while 60% of the population is pro-immigration, but doesn't care that much. The anti-immigration candidate could still win, because the pro-immigration crowd votes based on some bullshit like tax rates.
Did that make sense?
Was that your state party?
Also looking into the county and city, although both of those are a little questionable for me
This is one of the only democratic counties in the state
@Jacob That's why governments never allow direct referendums on immigration law. If they did, the anti-immigration side would win easily. In a general election, not enough people are single issue voters for the same effect. Not to mention that republican politicians refuse to support their constituents over their donors once elected
Do you think it's worth getting involved with any of the clubs? There's only one I qualify for, which is the young republicans, but would it be worth getting involved there too?
i would think so, if that's your thing
any way we can pull people further right the better
nice