Message from @ThisIsChris

Discord ID: 504346051151527957


2018-10-23 17:22:08 UTC  

Yes, for long, lol

2018-10-23 17:22:19 UTC  

but then again, our travel mobility kind of makes it easier

2018-10-23 17:22:28 UTC  

Maybe until we divergently evolve into separate groups after thousands of years

2018-10-23 17:22:36 UTC  

We should enact policies to encourage positive eugenics. I'd like special benefits for high IQ whites to have kids in a hypothetical future

2018-10-23 17:22:45 UTC  

White Earth 2025, lol.

2018-10-23 17:22:58 UTC  

White Moon 2030

2018-10-23 17:23:16 UTC  

Brown Moon 2025

2018-10-23 17:23:17 UTC  

White ExoPlanet 2050

2018-10-23 17:23:32 UTC  

In either case, I'm not saying we should try to create a white world or whatever, I'm just saying that I'd be lying to myself if I said I'm pro global diversity. I'm not pro, I'm just neutral.

Look, if you guys are genuinely pro global diversity, you should be going out of your way to fix Japanese birth rates

2018-10-23 17:24:29 UTC  

I think Japan's birthrate is a problem, but I wouldn't try to fix it until every problem whites face is fixed first. Ultimately, it's their job to save themselves

2018-10-23 17:25:19 UTC  

If you're pro global diversity than it's your job, too

2018-10-23 17:26:08 UTC  

If Japan was about to accept immigration, I would actually be totally in favor of warning them about and trying to convince them not to do it. But that's not because I'm pro global diversity, it's just because I don't want them to suffer.

2018-10-23 17:26:46 UTC  

...and because we may one day find ourselves being allies.

2018-10-23 17:27:02 UTC  

Sure, but, again, that's not because I'm pro global diversity

2018-10-23 17:27:20 UTC  

Agreed. Wasn't contradicting you; just tacking on another reason.

2018-10-23 17:29:13 UTC  

I am pro messing around with Africa. Too many of them and with climate change making parts of Africa uninhabitable might seriously mess up Europe

2018-10-23 17:29:45 UTC  

Any intelligent person, even liberals, recognize that Africaโ€™s population and rapid growth are a big problem

2018-10-23 17:30:37 UTC  

I'd say the average person has no idea about it

2018-10-23 17:30:54 UTC  

<:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770>

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/481597551272001546/504345988924964864/Screen_Shot_2018-10-23_at_1.30.35_PM.png

2018-10-23 17:30:58 UTC  

When they think of Africa they think of starving kids and world hunger

2018-10-23 17:31:08 UTC  

Republicans are inching closer...

2018-10-23 17:31:16 UTC  

I find it amazing that polls change so much

2018-10-23 17:31:27 UTC  

Do people really change their political beliefs weekly?

2018-10-23 17:31:45 UTC  

๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿ‘€

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/481597551272001546/504346203606089740/Screen_Shot_2018-10-23_at_1.31.23_PM.png

2018-10-23 17:31:56 UTC  

I don't get how someone can intend to vote Republican one week, Democrat next week, and then Republican again

2018-10-23 17:32:05 UTC  

not necessarily but support comes with certain actions

2018-10-23 17:32:41 UTC  

Nate Silver announced his odds, he things Dems have 86% chance to take the house

2018-10-23 17:32:46 UTC  

It's confusing because when you talk to people in real life, it seems to be really hard to change someone's belief. But, according to these polls, people wake up, join Antifa, quit, and join IE by lunch

2018-10-23 17:32:51 UTC  

For the past week PredictIt has had it at 66%

2018-10-23 17:33:15 UTC  

I still don't know how Nate Silver comes up with the numbers he does

2018-10-23 17:33:39 UTC  

I'm no mean statistics guy, but his numbers don't seem to be based on anything

2018-10-23 17:34:13 UTC  

@Salo Saloson he has homemade mathematical models, they basically plug in polling data, demographics, how the place voted last time, into some kind of model that spits out his probabilities.

2018-10-23 17:34:23 UTC  

The models in theory are tested on data from prior elections

2018-10-23 17:34:39 UTC  

... I don't know how much faith I have in his models

2018-10-23 17:34:41 UTC  

historically democrats will rule the house

2018-10-23 17:34:43 UTC  

but I think it's around none

2018-10-23 17:35:17 UTC  

also historically republicans would've won the last election

2018-10-23 17:36:31 UTC  

The polls don't vary that much. It's a small share of the population that starts undecided and shrinks as the campaign goes on. Also, much of who wins is decided by the base's turnout, not swing voters

2018-10-23 17:36:33 UTC  

>tfw state doesnโ€™t have early voting

2018-10-23 17:36:35 UTC  

Mad

2018-10-23 17:36:45 UTC  

@Procella Eques Let's hope the Trump phenomenon continues and he glitches the system once again...