I know

But you're kinda missing my point

The only reason I'd interfere in other race's affairs is to protect the environment because that affects all of us

I suppose even in hypotheticals, it might not be good of which to speak.

I'm just saying that I not "pro" global diversity, I'm just neutral to it

@TMatthews "Awfully nice country ya got there. Be a shame if we had to take it, because you won't stop polluting..." 😏

I just don't see why we should lie to ourselves and say that we need other groups to survive. Sure, I support their self-determination, I have no desire to get rid of them, but I don't care if they preserve themselves or not.

"You can't feed yourselves. We can, but you only get aid if you cut pollution and lower your birthrate." Honestly we should do that now. Even liberals like Macron know it's an issue

If the world only consisted of white identities, tribalism would still be a thing and we'd inevitably breed apart more

but even then, a world of 100avg iq is better than 70avg iq

Tribalism would be less of a thing

not for long

Yes, for long, lol

but then again, our travel mobility kind of makes it easier

Maybe until we divergently evolve into separate groups after thousands of years

We should enact policies to encourage positive eugenics. I'd like special benefits for high IQ whites to have kids in a hypothetical future

White Earth 2025, lol.

White Moon 2030

Brown Moon 2025

White ExoPlanet 2050

In either case, I'm not saying we should try to create a white world or whatever, I'm just saying that I'd be lying to myself if I said I'm pro global diversity. I'm not pro, I'm just neutral.

Look, if you guys are genuinely pro global diversity, you should be going out of your way to fix Japanese birth rates

I think Japan's birthrate is a problem, but I wouldn't try to fix it until every problem whites face is fixed first. Ultimately, it's their job to save themselves

If you're pro global diversity than it's your job, too

If Japan was about to accept immigration, I would actually be totally in favor of warning them about and trying to convince them not to do it. But that's not because I'm pro global diversity, it's just because I don't want them to suffer.

...and because we may one day find ourselves being allies.

Sure, but, again, that's not because I'm pro global diversity

Agreed. Wasn't contradicting you; just tacking on another reason.

I am pro messing around with Africa. Too many of them and with climate change making parts of Africa uninhabitable might seriously mess up Europe

Any intelligent person, even liberals, recognize that Africa’s population and rapid growth are a big problem

I'd say the average person has no idea about it

<:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770>

When they think of Africa they think of starving kids and world hunger

Republicans are inching closer...

I find it amazing that polls change so much

Do people really change their political beliefs weekly?

👀 👀 👀 👀 👀

I don't get how someone can intend to vote Republican one week, Democrat next week, and then Republican again

not necessarily but support comes with certain actions

Nate Silver announced his odds, he things Dems have 86% chance to take the house

It's confusing because when you talk to people in real life, it seems to be really hard to change someone's belief. But, according to these polls, people wake up, join Antifa, quit, and join IE by lunch

For the past week PredictIt has had it at 66%