Message from @Trashboat

Discord ID: 511409534724734997


2018-11-12 05:16:30 UTC  

People should take tests for genetic diseases and not have kids if there's a high risk

2018-11-12 05:16:38 UTC  

It’s more important to encourage women to have children than men. You have 2 female ancestors for every male one, which makes sense if you think about it, will source

2018-11-12 05:17:06 UTC  

Nate is correct.

2018-11-12 05:17:07 UTC  

Lord, make me an instrument of your will. Where there is injustice against my people may I bring right. Where there is error may I bring truth. Where my people despair may I bring hope. Grant that I may comfort my people rather than to be comforted - to serve them rather than to be served. For it is by putting the needs of my people before my own that I may best serve to secure the existence of my race and a future for White children. Good night, and peace be with you.

2018-11-12 05:17:11 UTC  

50% of men had children in the past.

2018-11-12 05:17:14 UTC  

@NateDahl76 is right, statistically speaking

2018-11-12 05:17:20 UTC  

Natural selection worked before, but now anyone can live to have children.

2018-11-12 05:17:27 UTC  

Wait what

2018-11-12 05:17:37 UTC  

I had 2 female ancestors for every male ancestor?

2018-11-12 05:17:47 UTC  

Yes. 50% of men reproduced before.

2018-11-12 05:17:48 UTC  

Someone redpill me on basic math

2018-11-12 05:18:02 UTC  

50 percent of your male ancestors didn't breed.

2018-11-12 05:18:09 UTC  

But almost 100 percent of your female ones did.

2018-11-12 05:18:10 UTC  

Because some ancestors repeat themselves @Trashboat

2018-11-12 05:18:13 UTC  

@Trashboat basically, you're wrong. there, you know basic math now. 😂

2018-11-12 05:18:20 UTC  

@Selma no that can't be possible

2018-11-12 05:18:27 UTC  

@YourFundamentalTheorum yeah that part I can get on board with

2018-11-12 05:18:35 UTC  

@Trashboat genetic tests show that there are about 2x times as many unique maternal ancestors as there are paternal ancestors

2018-11-12 05:18:42 UTC  

But how

2018-11-12 05:18:52 UTC  

it's not a necessity, it just happened to be that way

2018-11-12 05:18:54 UTC  

I understand what it means I just don't get how

2018-11-12 05:18:59 UTC  

I have some cousins that I'm related to twice. No incest involved.

2018-11-12 05:19:03 UTC  

@Trashboat one man two wives

2018-11-12 05:19:08 UTC  

@Trashboat Your male ancestors were more closely related to each other than your female ancestors.

2018-11-12 05:19:16 UTC  

@Jacob You sure about that

2018-11-12 05:19:17 UTC  

@Trashboat well, we yknow, incest was a thing back then

2018-11-12 05:19:33 UTC  

Holy wa I feel like an idiot even more than usual

2018-11-12 05:19:40 UTC  

@Distracted Yes. It's actually really simple it's explained.

2018-11-12 05:20:10 UTC  

Imagine we have two (Lucy and Ethel) and two men (Ricky and Fred). Lucy and Ethel both have 1 child with Ricky and none with Fred. Lucy has a boy named Ricky Jr, and, Ethel has a girl named Ethel Jr. When they grow up, Ricky Jr. and Ethel Jr. have a child. This child will have three female ancestors (Lucy, Ethel, and Ethel Jr) but only two male ancestors (Ricky and Ricky Jr). "

2018-11-12 05:20:31 UTC  

nice

2018-11-12 05:20:40 UTC  

copied from reddit upvotes pls

2018-11-12 05:20:47 UTC  

A sibling pair married another sibling pair. This causes their descendants to be cousins on both sides. @Distracted

2018-11-12 05:20:47 UTC  

Ahh

2018-11-12 05:20:50 UTC  

That makes sense

2018-11-12 05:21:06 UTC  

Yeah I was about to say

2018-11-12 05:21:17 UTC  

What are those names lol

2018-11-12 05:21:20 UTC  

ALPHA GUYS HAD MORE KIDS

2018-11-12 05:21:25 UTC  

WHILE BETA MEN HAD 0

2018-11-12 05:21:26 UTC  

BASED

2018-11-12 05:21:32 UTC  

and redpilled

2018-11-12 05:23:41 UTC  

Guys I just caught my first week long twitter ban