Dysgenics is definitely an issue

I know very intelligent blacks with no kids

@YourFundamentalTheorum "doesn't mean it's good" yeah maybe I'm not sure. I think life is complex and doesn't always fit too neatly into our ideals. Of course I think for some people it is just psycho-cultural burdens that block them from getting married but those are very real to them and as people get older they get more ingrained in their habita

And high IQ people can be quite neurotic.

It's a shame, really.

I'm sure there were kings who did not want to have children, but did it anyway to prolong their bloodline. It's just better for some people to have kids, but of course it's not going to be for everyone.

@ThisIsChris I agree that many people are indeed not fit or incapable for various reasons for procreation. However, if you can have kids and have suitable economic and family conditions, but you don't, at least in my church it's a sin. And I think most people here would agree that it's not ideal either.

tl;dr not having kids because of selfishness is usually bad

Let us remember the Americans whose lives were squandered in foreign conflicts.

People should take tests for genetic diseases and not have kids if there's a high risk

It’s more important to encourage women to have children than men. You have 2 female ancestors for every male one, which makes sense if you think about it, will source

Nate is correct.

Lord, make me an instrument of your will. Where there is injustice against my people may I bring right. Where there is error may I bring truth. Where my people despair may I bring hope. Grant that I may comfort my people rather than to be comforted - to serve them rather than to be served. For it is by putting the needs of my people before my own that I may best serve to secure the existence of my race and a future for White children. Good night, and peace be with you.

50% of men had children in the past.

@NateDahl76 is right, statistically speaking

Natural selection worked before, but now anyone can live to have children.

Wait what

I had 2 female ancestors for every male ancestor?

Yes. 50% of men reproduced before.

Someone redpill me on basic math

50 percent of your male ancestors didn't breed.

But almost 100 percent of your female ones did.

Because some ancestors repeat themselves @Trashboat

@Trashboat basically, you're wrong. there, you know basic math now. 😂

@Selma no that can't be possible

@YourFundamentalTheorum yeah that part I can get on board with

@Trashboat genetic tests show that there are about 2x times as many unique maternal ancestors as there are paternal ancestors

But how

it's not a necessity, it just happened to be that way

I understand what it means I just don't get how

I have some cousins that I'm related to twice. No incest involved.

@Trashboat one man two wives

@Trashboat Your male ancestors were more closely related to each other than your female ancestors.

@Jacob You sure about that

@Trashboat well, we yknow, incest was a thing back then

Holy wa I feel like an idiot even more than usual

@Distracted Yes. It's actually really simple it's explained.

Imagine we have two (Lucy and Ethel) and two men (Ricky and Fred). Lucy and Ethel both have 1 child with Ricky and none with Fred. Lucy has a boy named Ricky Jr, and, Ethel has a girl named Ethel Jr. When they grow up, Ricky Jr. and Ethel Jr. have a child. This child will have three female ancestors (Lucy, Ethel, and Ethel Jr) but only two male ancestors (Ricky and Ricky Jr). "

nice

copied from reddit upvotes pls

A sibling pair married another sibling pair. This causes their descendants to be cousins on both sides. @Distracted