Ivanka should have married Tom Brady.

Perhaps social control was a poor choice of words in this context. I mean social values. You can have a sweet economic system but if it’s Egalitarian there will be difficulties.

Ivanka should have married Varg and converted to Odinism

@Reinhard Wolff Hot take boss

60% in. Cindy has 55.7% of the vote.

I mean she would be a better influence on Blormpf

@Sam Anderson I agree. Social values are partly shaped by economic reality however.

@godric same haga

You're like right under me

This test isn't very accurate

not exactly insightful questions

8values is much better

You will enjoy this one more.

https://8values.github.io/

@Sam Anderson Anti-libertarian or anti-egalitarian?

@Rabbidsith hard times economically spur traditional values. My family that was born during the Great Depression is the most trad and conservative (both economically and environmentally). Neo Liberalism creates degenerate abundance, and therefore the ability to have antisocial values.

Now I have odd visions of Varg trying to teach understandably skeptical nephew Barron how to throw axes in the rose garden. Not sure that would work out

@Rabbidsith anti both

I'm taking back my criticism of Cindy. She deserves a big bowl of ice cream.

She must feel very special that her marriage was the target for the greater good of Isreal.

@Sam Anderson It's possible to be a socially conservative libertarian.

I put that companies' potential impact on the environment should be regulated. That this is a "leftist" view is a modern perversion of the last 40 years imo.

MS at 55%, Cindy +11 rn

@Sam Anderson It's just that I don't believe in authoritiarian practices to achieve social conservatism.

60% in. Cindy has 55.7% of the vote.

@Sam Anderson They aren't necessary and don't work in the long term. Good philosophy is a better alternative.

@Sam Southern - TN Where are you looking?

Who posted the ProudBoys logo?...that's dangerous stuff now!

authoritarianism doesn't do the job and only legitimizes radicals

who wish to undermine the system

NYT, do you have a more up to the minute site? gibs!

If the public disagrees with you, then no amount of authoritarian measures will change that @Sam Anderson .

Hoping Hyde-Smith wins to make up for Romney's inevitable betrayals

@Rabbidsith In our current system, if the public disagrees with you it doesn't matter at all

Apparently Invictus is not the PB leader I believe it’s some guy with initials. Although I read it’s not a true leader but a chairman of a board. There’s a website

Jason Van Dyke. Their lawyer.

@Rabbidsith agreed on the last point. Libertarianism by how it is understood by the public is inherently nihilistic on social issues other than property rights. Capitalism would be a better term than Libertarian. Identitarian Capitalism. Aka Capitalism within a high trust society that can maintain tradition in the face of degenerate consumerism.

He’s the new leader

Not that I wanna split the term Identitarian or anything. We have enough of a journey ahead pushing the term foreword as it is.

The third way, Sam. The third way... 😏

This seems about right.

But I'm not a fascist