Unless you can confirm it again and again.

And test it by *coherency*

Oh for sure, but that's not what the Stanford experiment was about, no? The idea was without authoritarian leaders, individuals are still likelu to devolve into cruelty.

Id call that misinterpreting the data.

and misunderstanding how humans act in packs.

Humans in populus always have leaders.

You cant avoid that, as hierarchies are formed 3 sec after the elevator stops.

So the authoritarian doctor in the Stanford scenario is one of guards who's taken control?

I can see that.

You can have one authoritarian captain who demands cruelty. Does not invalidate the experiment. Such captains are found plentyful in the real world. All colors, genders and nationalities.

It really depends on who gets the leadership in a lot of ways. But again if the 'pack leader' in the experiment was 'acting'....

I agree.

We're basically turning the scotus chat into a Petersonesque discussion lol

It is polyfactorial. Always.

For sure.

We are. And I would like to continue it. I have a full day, however, and we are contaminating now, yes. Ill look you up later for this? It is interesting.

I think Ordinary Men is still far better example

Sure

Have a good one!

u2

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110620zr_g31i.pdf

what's that?

ahh

scotus orders

What happens if they hadn't separated the votes?

Since per constitution the state legislators make election rules, it is silly that roberts bounced it back, this could have been avoided.

The reason it got bounced back is because of the potential of a 4/4 split. At least now it could be a 5/4 or 6/3 in favor of Trump

@WatchingYouDaily If ACB votes as we expect. She's already declined to participate. Robert Barnes has no faith in her.

@GregInHouston2 I had not faith in her I am with Barnes on his selection because Barbara Lagoa would have taken the time to get familiar with the briefs and would have taken the time to review them during oral arguments as well. She is a member of the same National Honor Society I am but I am a 2 chapter inductee. Also, In April 2019, Lagoa wrote for the unanimous court when it found that DeSantis acted within his authority by suspending Sheriff Scott Israel for his response to the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.

I thought day before election acb had opportunity to vote on it but said she wasn't prepared, so they bounced it back because view would remain 4 4 without her vote.

I think Barnes was right, hope I'm wrong

@NavigateTheAbyss, you just advanced to level 1!

a ghost ^

!rank

When is Powell going to start her litigation

You probably want to put your question in the election2020 case section. But I imagine it's likely the same pleading that is in the court listener link I just posted, which also has all of the evidence files.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/07/texas-sues-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-at-supreme-court-election-rules/amp/

If a case makes it on the docket, does that guarantee it gets heard?

Do you mean on the docket for the Supreme Court? Yes. If they "grant cert" then the case will be considered.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

So, it's gonna be heard?