Hm

👍

I agree.... Just keep in mind that Compromise Order was already approved by a court.

This is also in violation of Georgia Law
https://hannity.com/media-room/breaking-now-surveillance-footage-shows-atlanta-workers-scanning-ballots-from-suitcase-after-hours/

yeah I read it and I don't think that one is going to the Supreme Court whereas I do think it's possible the PA one does

Egregious mistake of Epic proportions.

Which law and how does it violate it? You can't just say something violate "the law"..... you need to tell us which law and how it violates that law. Otherwise the statement is too general to be useful.

So much fake news. The appetite for it is insatiable.

he basically caught Mellissa Corone in the equivalent of perjury of her whole testimony but she wasnt actually subject to it because not sworn in 😄

I swear he's on the DNC payroll

Lmao that was the whole idea.

Yeah possibly... moving the date back (if that is what happened, I haven't looked) seems like something that will be looked at closely. And should be looked at closely.

reviewing the hearing now for the part...

Ah I see the discrepancy. The state department didn't do the signature matching, the counties did. They dispute the counties. The claim by the Trump team is that the state department hasn't even performed a signature matching audit. So requesting the judge to allow them (Trump's Team) to see the evidence would be more about proving to the judge that the state department hasn't done the audit. That would enable the judge to order the state department to do the signature match.

@Bey they were Trump's ballots

@MatiLuc Yes, anyone can make claims about what that video showed.

Just like everything else they are reciting at rallies.

I absolutely agree that the a court could potentially require the State to do an audit. But thee is zero basis to have any outside experts do the audit.

Keep in mind too that we are running out of time. I am forgetting the date... but don't electors have to be chosen by like December 14th?

No court is going to do anything that would effectively make it impossible for a state to certify without some proof of real fraud.

But the suitcase video was shown during the hearing - so = likely official

They need to establish prima facia evidence that the state has posession of, so the outside signature matcher auditor would simply be to establish that evidence.

The video looks like a video. Nothing else seems definitive.

@carolinaflying yes suitcases for Trump.. or jorgensen

The Security video is independent primary evidence.

@DeaneSir agreed

The Sec of State Office says they have addressed that and explained it. I watched the video and I saw nothing that look obviously out of place or odd. BUT... that is what courts are for... both sides bring their evidence and explanations to court so it can be looked at. Team Trump has that right. They have exercised that right over 40 times so far... their batting average sucks tho

That's the whole point of these sham hearings. They can say anything shows anything they want. People are still parroting the radio flyer news crew wagon fake news. Credulous people have no limits.

please explain how it is a valuation of the law when its evidence being shown to a state legislative body.

It doesn't matter who the "suitcase" ballots were for, the act seen in the security video is in violation of Georgia law.

Their batting average is not evidence but standing based though...

👍

No. In order for a court to order an outside audit would require Team Trump to prove that the State is suspect, not capable of doing it or something like that.

The audit is in the law. The audit is, PER THE LAW, to be conducted by the State. Not a third party.

“CHAIN of CUSTODY” broken

I never said it was evidence, did I ?

As @Dedkraken shared before, this was investigated previously by the Sec of State's office. They reviewed the surveillance video and interviewed those involved: https://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-news/georgia-opens-2-investigations-into-fultons-elections-operations/EVCBN4ZJTZELPDHMH63POL3RKQ/

There is no doubt

@PrivateEye they could've come up with. A better fraud plan than .. wait until 3am .. when we are alone snd can be identify .. and scan this big black cases.. not logic

They maintained chain of custody and had an independent observer as prescribed by law.

You mean, the fox is guarding the hen house?

You said that their evidence and explainations can be looked at in court, and that they've done that 40 times, but their batting average sucks. They've yet to show evidence in court 40 times. Not even close.

There is enough prove in that footage for Republican to make a case and I think a judge would possibly hear arugements on the matter and not toss it out like other cases as the footage meet the merits needed in a court case at both state and federal level.

@Scott McHarris, you just advanced to level 2!