That's not the same as 94% smudged Id's on the ballots. But it is curious that so many required adjudication. He explained that there were several reason why they might need adjudication. The adjudication process is supposed to have a panel that includes members for both parties. I would also like to point out that messing up that badly on fake mail-in ballots would make me question the competence of the criminal masterminds as opposed to it confirming their multidimensional chess skills.

@TaLoN132 It would go against the pristine ballot theory

C'mon, man...

https://youtu.be/in49w0rnEe8

So lets look at this with Carone's Math
22 to 24 Machines jammed 2 to 3 times an hour at that location

She says that when these jams happened they would “re-scan” the entire batch. 

Her example was this:


Often in a batch of 50 ballots would get jammed by ballot number 25.

 When this happened she claimed that ballots #1 thru #25 would be re-scan.



So let do the math there:


24 machines each jamming 3 times an hour is 72 jams an hour.



If those Machines ran for just 8 hours that would be 576 jams in an 8 hour day.



If we then take ballots #25 - 50 and rescan them in each of those jams we get
 14,400 extra ballots. 



But wait…. In her testimony she is saying that individual ballots are being scanned 9 to 10 times. 



So 10 x 14,400 is 144,000

144,000 

Sooo… that means we would have seen 144,000 more votes than there are ballots.

And this was in a single tabulating center, in a single county. 

Really? 

@jfindley

@jfindley despite them being illiterate my point is you alluded to the machines and the 107m contract. The type of scam being explained now is machine independent

How do you figure it's machine independent? Did they not scan ballots with machines?

It is absolutely asinine to believe this happened

There were Trump supporters watching for malfeasance every where... On the street where vans were parked suspiciously, voting machines that were supposedly wheeled in on red wagons that ended up being camera equipment; mysterious food trucks that seemed suspicious and out of place; poll workers being followed to and from the parking lot... They had to get the fake ballots in somehow - and every single one of them had mad ninja skills so as to evade the watchful eye of the Trump faithful.

Asinine if you attempt to suggest that her testimony was that every machine jammed at #25, and every scanner re-scanned batches 9-10 times in a row.

Because the theory being proposed is that new ballots appeared out of nowhere, like ballot laundering, that is machine independent. You could use any scanning/counting device @jfindley

**also that every re-scan was an improper one. She couldn't watch 22 machines at once. In fact, with the arrangement are her area, I'd find it very difficult to keep up with more than one.

That’s how you get a matching recount by hand @jfindley

Can you explain your reasoning there, please? How do you think that works?

If you count ballots with the machine and then they get counted multiple times that shows up in the hand recount. You would have more machine counted votes than hand counted ones, because the machine counted it multiple times. @jfindley

hi, can someone explain what happens if trump proves fraud and wins georgia?

@Kaiser, you just advanced to level 1!

The kraken theory suggests the machines themselves switched votes over, that would be something that shows up in a hand recount. The machine can’t erase bubbles and switch they over physically. They just scan and count @jfindley

if that's all he does then he still loses the election

Ah ok, that's what I was thinking

The PA thing is the most interesting and also slimy

I don't understand what is where, I'm not native US

agreed ... still even a Supreme Court fix is not likely to give that state to Trump

georgia is the water leak thing, right?

what was the problem with PA?

where's the link to the cases that @RobertGrulerEsq talked about in his last livestream

?

So if those ballots in GA in the suitcases were fake, could those change the outcome of the senate race? Could this mean there isn’t supposed to be a run off?

I don't even necessarily believe in the multiple scanned ballots theory. Mostly this is an exercise in showing the incredulity at this happing as poorly refuted surface level analysis of most people in here. Did you see how far back this had to be walked? To recounters noticing malformed bar codes?

Slides?

don't think so but I'll check ... he was talking about another YouTube/website that was keeping track

Has anyone heard of an AZ case that had both parties examining ballots with R finding 6% error rate and D finding an 11% error rate on signature verifications? What case is it?

there's multiple cases in multiple states ... something 40+ lawsuits in 7 states?

I did not, but I will check it out. How did these fare in the machine recount? Did they have re-adjudicate them as duplicated ballots?

So you're saying the following scenario is impossible, then, according to "krakenomics"?

- 100 ballots cast, 50 for Trump, 50 for Biden
- Machine counts the ballots, 75 for Biden, 50 for Trump (implying 125 ballots cast)
- Freeman receives phone call from someone, "Hey, add 25 more Biden ballots."
- 125 Ballots now exist, 50 for Trump, and 75 for Biden.
- Hand re-count matches machine count

They say though most of those failed

66 lawsuits

A constitutional issue they never completed the process to have mail in ballots as a whole be acceptable. They had the primaries already under this ruling. This was a process started by the PA GOP and they just never finished it so technically the mail ballots are unconstitutional so they could throw away millions of ballots. It’s doubtful they would overturn millions of ballots submitted in good faith. However technically I guess they could @Kaiser

most did ... one in PA is the one most likely to make it to Supreme Court

I don't know, I was just coming up with a protocol that would enable us to get to the point where the adjudicaters need to notice bad bar codes for me to fail.

I did it in 15 min.

It still has to balance back to the voter rolls. They know how many mail-in ballots were requested and received - before they start counting. The same is true with in-person voting - everyone has to sign in to vote. They would have to somehow update those to account for stuffed ballots.