There were Trump supporters watching for malfeasance every where... On the street where vans were parked suspiciously, voting machines that were supposedly wheeled in on red wagons that ended up being camera equipment; mysterious food trucks that seemed suspicious and out of place; poll workers being followed to and from the parking lot... They had to get the fake ballots in somehow - and every single one of them had mad ninja skills so as to evade the watchful eye of the Trump faithful.

Asinine if you attempt to suggest that her testimony was that every machine jammed at #25, and every scanner re-scanned batches 9-10 times in a row.

Because the theory being proposed is that new ballots appeared out of nowhere, like ballot laundering, that is machine independent. You could use any scanning/counting device @jfindley

**also that every re-scan was an improper one. She couldn't watch 22 machines at once. In fact, with the arrangement are her area, I'd find it very difficult to keep up with more than one.

That’s how you get a matching recount by hand @jfindley

Can you explain your reasoning there, please? How do you think that works?

If you count ballots with the machine and then they get counted multiple times that shows up in the hand recount. You would have more machine counted votes than hand counted ones, because the machine counted it multiple times. @jfindley

hi, can someone explain what happens if trump proves fraud and wins georgia?

@Kaiser, you just advanced to level 1!

The kraken theory suggests the machines themselves switched votes over, that would be something that shows up in a hand recount. The machine can’t erase bubbles and switch they over physically. They just scan and count @jfindley

if that's all he does then he still loses the election

Ah ok, that's what I was thinking

The PA thing is the most interesting and also slimy

I don't understand what is where, I'm not native US

agreed ... still even a Supreme Court fix is not likely to give that state to Trump

georgia is the water leak thing, right?

what was the problem with PA?

where's the link to the cases that @RobertGrulerEsq talked about in his last livestream

?

So if those ballots in GA in the suitcases were fake, could those change the outcome of the senate race? Could this mean there isn’t supposed to be a run off?

I don't even necessarily believe in the multiple scanned ballots theory. Mostly this is an exercise in showing the incredulity at this happing as poorly refuted surface level analysis of most people in here. Did you see how far back this had to be walked? To recounters noticing malformed bar codes?

Slides?

don't think so but I'll check ... he was talking about another YouTube/website that was keeping track

Has anyone heard of an AZ case that had both parties examining ballots with R finding 6% error rate and D finding an 11% error rate on signature verifications? What case is it?

there's multiple cases in multiple states ... something 40+ lawsuits in 7 states?

I did not, but I will check it out. How did these fare in the machine recount? Did they have re-adjudicate them as duplicated ballots?

So you're saying the following scenario is impossible, then, according to "krakenomics"?

- 100 ballots cast, 50 for Trump, 50 for Biden
- Machine counts the ballots, 75 for Biden, 50 for Trump (implying 125 ballots cast)
- Freeman receives phone call from someone, "Hey, add 25 more Biden ballots."
- 125 Ballots now exist, 50 for Trump, and 75 for Biden.
- Hand re-count matches machine count

They say though most of those failed

66 lawsuits

A constitutional issue they never completed the process to have mail in ballots as a whole be acceptable. They had the primaries already under this ruling. This was a process started by the PA GOP and they just never finished it so technically the mail ballots are unconstitutional so they could throw away millions of ballots. It’s doubtful they would overturn millions of ballots submitted in good faith. However technically I guess they could @Kaiser

most did ... one in PA is the one most likely to make it to Supreme Court

I don't know, I was just coming up with a protocol that would enable us to get to the point where the adjudicaters need to notice bad bar codes for me to fail.

I did it in 15 min.

It still has to balance back to the voter rolls. They know how many mail-in ballots were requested and received - before they start counting. The same is true with in-person voting - everyone has to sign in to vote. They would have to somehow update those to account for stuffed ballots.

@jfindley what you described of adding more ballots is one thing . The machine switching votes is the other. If the machine switched votes that would be caught in a hand recount. The adding of new ballots is a theory with no substance behind it. The phone call in the video that was posted was to confine counting the ballots that has already been observed in front of poll watchers. They weren’t secret mysterious ballots.

Wow... I said the example she gave.... I used HER testimony. And yes its completely asinine.

A lightly disclosed fact in all of this is that that's one of the features that Zuckerberg's 400M investment into the election got him. Access to the voter rolls.

@jfindley the machine doesn’t print out new ballots it only scans them. You can’t put in 100 and get 125 out

25 is the 50% mark of 50. And again, I didnt make those ridiculous claims... Corone did.

I am not suggesting they jammed at 25 she did. But I assume that it was just an example. As some jams might have occurred at number 44 and some at number 3. So 25 is the mid point, the example she used.

I don't believe a damn word of it... but if you want to put her up as a credible witness, which is fucking hilarious, then you have to take her testimony as it was given.