I'd have been here much earlier

tbh I was never really offended by Stormfront, I just didn't find it particularly interesting

well, and there was a feeling of "these guys are kinda silly"

It’s amazing to me how many of us went from being very liberal Democrats to IE. I think it’s awesome! It shows that we have evolved we have done our homework we have done our research and we were open to accepting the facts and the truth

https://youtu.be/dCFXT5w_RQQ

just saw a BBC video of a white girl with a brown babydoll explaining why she won't have kids <:really:453005408064241674>

Subtle!

😑

idk, looks like basic damage control while still defending his beliefs

Yeah Okay. Retweeting Lana though.
*WINK NUDGE* We hear you Steve

also this will only push more normie nationalists further right

the more basic pro-american rhetoric is considered "hateful" by the left, the more regular people will care less

Some definitely will. Some will go along with the program as they always have. Hard to know if the mass redPilling curve is exponential or linear. We grow but so do our opponents

Has anyone seen the film Child 44? It’s fantastic.

RE Steve king post - I quit reading at “reject” lol.

yes

Super cucked and homosexual statement tbh

He has to realize this gains him nothing

Comparing WN to “literally der Shoah” is unimaginably retarded of him too my god

he can test the waters but if he goes in too deep he drowns himself

he said what he said, the GOP will grumble but do nothing, and our ideas get normalized further

I’d rather not normalize them by comparing WN to literally anudda Shoah

if he refused to do damage control the GOP would have had a reason to go after him and we could lose /ourguy/ in the senate

He could’ve done this in a much better way, I think most all here agree this apology went into some unnecessary levels of cuckery.

He’s looking out for his own interests . He too has to pay the bills at the end of the day. He’s making sure his career is not over... but he planted a seed ... and people can read between the lines

I do wonder though if IE shouldn’t perhaps contact him and tell him that we too do not consider ourselves supremacists and we too reject events of the past. But we as an organization advocate for western civilization and are committed to defending our way of life ...

We advocate for Whites explicitly lol

Not “Western Civilization” which implicitly but insufficiently implies White

We don’t advocate for western civilization??

What I was trying to do was I was trying to build on common ground and I was trying to use his own words

Western civilization can be seen as inclusive to various nonWhites that “assimilate” and doesn’t imply the exclusivity of Whites only, which is what this group is advocating for.

Stating “we reject events of the past” is cucking

eg, the pro-homosexual pro-diversity Proud Boys were a “western civ” group

This isn’t the proud boys

@⚡Clark⚡ agreed. What on earth are we apologizing for/rejecting ffs

@Sam Southern - TN you’re basically giving them credibility and the moral high ground

By apologizing yeah. We have no reason to.

Jared Taylor very often talks about how we do not condone events of the past that people want to link to our brand

And I never talked about apology if you read my comment

I don’t recall talking about the fact that we should apologize so I am puzzled