I just rewatched that trailer because she had a weird accent and one thing she says is "We're not allowed to work in mines" lmao what woman wants to work in mines, let alone what man
Edit: She has an accent because a British girl plays her, really breaking the immersion of this being an American woman coming from nothing to SCOTUS

Also was a box office failure according to wiki, 20 mil budget, 14.7 mil box office

Only the good ole country boys of WV (alma mater) work in dem mines

How did they spend 20 million? I assume it doesn't have any explosions or anything making a legal biography seems like it would be incredibly cheap to make.

Relatively well known actors, marketing

They probably employed oppressed people (LGBTQ+, POC, etc...) so they needed to pay them “prevailing wage” and then throw a markup on that to make it “equal opportunity”

You know, to make them equal to the “privilege”

@fgtveassassin what’s more fitting for a Brit to play a rootless cosmopolitan judge. It seems someone in the producers office didn’t pick up on subliminal message that someone doesn’t belong.

But will people talk about it?

The film was written by her nephew

Should have shot the film and kept it in a warehouse and then roll it out when she dies. Way better ticket sales.

That's using that noggin

That’s how you know it’s not about money.

That’s what happens when Harvey is out of the game 😂🤣

💖

https://twitter.com/RichRaho/status/1086741667229696003?s=19

If everyone and their behaviors is of the Nazis, then who’s left?

https://youtu.be/dMPr77gB1aU This was from 7yrs ago but apparently its still happening?! Was sent this today..

I hope that they closed this,can someone please prove me wrong?

@StevePines -WA Turns out the entire story of the kids "harassing an indigenous man" was completely fabricated. They were set up and approached, confused into thinking they were being joined by the drummer, and the narrative was sold as the complete opposite. _Hrrrrrm, where have we heard this before?_

(Thread below). And this examination is coming from Tim Pool, who's a pretty hard leftist.

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1086866650446655488

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL posting Tim Pool should be a bannable offense.

It should be lol 😛 But he actually wrote something objective for once

Well, looks like the Dems are rejecting Trump's offer. He can still come out of this a hero if he uses this to say "well, I tried" and declares SoE.

Anyone have an idea how much it would cost to create a professional video hosting website?

@⚡Clark⚡ Plenty. Think about those storage costs.

@sigruna14 “plenty” isn’t an answer

@⚡Clark⚡ It's an answer enough. I mean do you think you're going to host this yourself?

Looking for a ballpark number, not a scoff

Depends how many videos you want to host. If you're trying to compete with YouTube, millions.

I mean, in all honesty, I'm not sure why you can't just look up cloud storage costs per GB and multiply it appropriately.

@sigruna14 That’s a good idea, thanks

The idea is to fight the problem of demonitization for non kosher certified creators, which is an ever growing market for content creators. instead of having Patreon be their revenue source, which no longer provides that service, combine the two. Where to watch a video, the viewer has to pay a penny or so. This removes advertisers control of acceptable content. Also, storage cost would be relatively low. To post a video, a creator has to pay a small fee, this would help to lower crap content, and videos that receive minimal views be removed after a certain time period. Any critiques to the feasibility as success of this idea are gladly welcomed

If successful, the monopoly Netflix and Hollywood has on entertainment could be decentralized

It could work. Critique-wise, I would, if I were a content creator, be worried about the fees and removal of low-view videos. Some videos that might not be so popular can be good. Also, people are not going to want to pay, even a penny, to watch videos. It's not just about the cost of the penny, it's about the hassle of making an account, the trust issues of giving you their credit card (and you'll also need a payment processor for that, which is a potential source of deplatforming). Many/most people will not take the time to go to that trouble when they can go to YouTube for free. Your storage provider can also deplatform you. You'll find yourself relying on an already-established large cloud company, like Google or Amazon, to store your videos. Even if you use a less-known company, still, there's that risk. And that will also discourage content creator participation - who wants to pay fees to host their content, when there's a very real risk of the site being deplatformed and all their money just going down the drain?

All in all, if you think you can do it, you should try. But that's where I forsee potential problems.

I got a ping?

@sigruna14 I’ll assume that less people will pay even the penny for content, and take the risk that enough would do it so that creators the website. To increase creators willingness to use the website exclusively, perhaps there should be no fee for posting content, and the minimal views for video to remain be very low. Creators would only need 1/10th of the views to receive the sam amount of revenue they would from YouTube, and that’s provided that their content is monitized, which it probably isn’t. The risk of deplatforming is the greatest. Reliance on 3rd party Payment processors, web providers, and storage providers is the vulnerability. The question would be how to decrease the reliance on those elements, which brings us back to the “build your own bank” conundrum. Thanks for the feedback. Much to ponder.

You can buy your own servers, but it'll probably require a loan to get a considerable amount of space (as well as the hosting costs once your ISP finds out your serving content). Using Amazon servers or something like that is trying to find "safe" entry into a pretty risky business. I am not of the opinion that method is particularly successful.

Can anybody explain what exactly the kid who stared at the indian did wrong?

Just realized something. But don’t take this as 100% fact because I could be wrong. My mom plays a lot of Native American music at her shop (she sells crystals and stuff), and the one song they were playing at that catholic pro life rally sounded EERILY similar to a Cherokee war song my mom plays in her shop.

So that kinda adds flame to that fire lol