Message from @Fred X - NJ
Discord ID: 536430495618301952
Let's not forget that Spencer openly stated his intention to destroy our organization
and not even her anymore
They see Spencer as like a literal God who will save the white race in 4 years time as president
@Lawrence - TX that fact notwithstanding.
Someone in here somedays a go said "Duginist War Wives". Cracked a rib laughing at that.
Cracked a rib RBG style
“On the basis of sex” aka “movie of the year” 🙄🤢🤮
I just rewatched that trailer because she had a weird accent and one thing she says is "We're not allowed to work in mines" lmao what woman wants to work in mines, let alone what man
Edit: She has an accent because a British girl plays her, really breaking the immersion of this being an American woman coming from nothing to SCOTUS
Also was a box office failure according to wiki, 20 mil budget, 14.7 mil box office
Only the good ole country boys of WV (alma mater) work in dem mines
How did they spend 20 million? I assume it doesn't have any explosions or anything making a legal biography seems like it would be incredibly cheap to make.
Relatively well known actors, marketing
They probably employed oppressed people (LGBTQ+, POC, etc...) so they needed to pay them “prevailing wage” and then throw a markup on that to make it “equal opportunity”
You know, to make them equal to the “privilege”
@fgtveassassin what’s more fitting for a Brit to play a rootless cosmopolitan judge. It seems someone in the producers office didn’t pick up on subliminal message that someone doesn’t belong.
But will people talk about it?
The film was written by her nephew
Should have shot the film and kept it in a warehouse and then roll it out when she dies. Way better ticket sales.
That's using that noggin
That’s how you know it’s not about money.
If everyone and their behaviors is of the Nazis, then who’s left?
https://youtu.be/dMPr77gB1aU This was from 7yrs ago but apparently its still happening?! Was sent this today..
I hope that they closed this,can someone please prove me wrong?
@StevePines -WA Turns out the entire story of the kids "harassing an indigenous man" was completely fabricated. They were set up and approached, confused into thinking they were being joined by the drummer, and the narrative was sold as the complete opposite. _Hrrrrrm, where have we heard this before?_
(Thread below). And this examination is coming from Tim Pool, who's a pretty hard leftist.
https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1086866650446655488
@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL posting Tim Pool should be a bannable offense.
It should be lol 😛 But he actually wrote something objective for once
Well, looks like the Dems are rejecting Trump's offer. He can still come out of this a hero if he uses this to say "well, I tried" and declares SoE.
Anyone have an idea how much it would cost to create a professional video hosting website?
@sigruna14 “plenty” isn’t an answer
@⚡Clark⚡ It's an answer enough. I mean do you think you're going to host this yourself?
Looking for a ballpark number, not a scoff
Depends how many videos you want to host. If you're trying to compete with YouTube, millions.
I mean, in all honesty, I'm not sure why you can't just look up cloud storage costs per GB and multiply it appropriately.
@sigruna14 That’s a good idea, thanks
The idea is to fight the problem of demonitization for non kosher certified creators, which is an ever growing market for content creators. instead of having Patreon be their revenue source, which no longer provides that service, combine the two. Where to watch a video, the viewer has to pay a penny or so. This removes advertisers control of acceptable content. Also, storage cost would be relatively low. To post a video, a creator has to pay a small fee, this would help to lower crap content, and videos that receive minimal views be removed after a certain time period. Any critiques to the feasibility as success of this idea are gladly welcomed
If successful, the monopoly Netflix and Hollywood has on entertainment could be decentralized
It could work. Critique-wise, I would, if I were a content creator, be worried about the fees and removal of low-view videos. Some videos that might not be so popular can be good. Also, people are not going to want to pay, even a penny, to watch videos. It's not just about the cost of the penny, it's about the hassle of making an account, the trust issues of giving you their credit card (and you'll also need a payment processor for that, which is a potential source of deplatforming). Many/most people will not take the time to go to that trouble when they can go to YouTube for free. Your storage provider can also deplatform you. You'll find yourself relying on an already-established large cloud company, like Google or Amazon, to store your videos. Even if you use a less-known company, still, there's that risk. And that will also discourage content creator participation - who wants to pay fees to host their content, when there's a very real risk of the site being deplatformed and all their money just going down the drain?