Message from @97 Eleven
Discord ID: 607515164140503040
Therefore the distance maintains itself
You're saying: "If we were in infinite space, then something should happen"
We're saying: "since we are in infinite space, your something makes 0 sense"
Then you answer: "baseless claims i don't understand what you're saying"
Stop! Stop! He's already dead!
@rivenator12113 lol try climbing up a steep mountain in a straight line, then try climbing it using a curved path, then come back and cry about rockets having a curved path in the atmosphere
Huh? Astronomers philosophers and astrophysics alike all confirm the universe is expanding into infinite space. Hello?
Supposedly
Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!
yes, thanks for proving my point?
Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!
Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!
what are you trying to say Kat? be careful, the bot doesn't like certain words lol
c r e e p e r
lol why?
so we can sing revenge
not sure i get it
its a meme
:o
i am listening, thanks for this *gem* hue hue
your welcome
@Albert Einstein the same force can explain every single one of these and is compatible with QFT and has shown to be measurement wise more accurate then gravity
@Akhanyatin again, that's not how QM works buddy. Quantum **mechanics**, do you understand what the word means. And half of that was an assortment of baseless claims and assertions. So far, whenever I've debated you, you have a tendency to indulge in your own ignorance to make arguments that aren't even remotely relevant. Most of what you've said I've even addressed before. You somehow think because I haven't mentioned those I'm ignoring them, which goes to show that you've really got no idea how the flat earth model works in general.
@97 Eleven No way that one force can predict all the different inertial forces from a spinning sphere man onto a flat earth.
Eotvos effect and the normal coriolis effect
I think you are using the complexity of the math to actually be more vague
The way to actually get these equations is with the simple geometry of a spinning sphere.
And yes this will be a huge problem for you because you need to introduce more forces and QFT does not like that
And there is a another force (inertial force) here that gets introduced too.
Dropping objects straight down will also produce a deviated path
Which again follows the simple equations of a spinning sphere
Why would QFT not like that 🤔
Well first do we agree that you need a bunch of weird extra forces?
You realize that we have classical descriptions of forces before we introduce them to QFT
Depends, mathematically the one I've been using can explain quite a lot but maybe I'd require an additional one for some inertial forces
"for some inertial forces"
Oh yes
And reminder, a lot of people don't believe in the coreolis effect entirely
Let's for the purposes of discussion assume it's correct
I can give you evidence for that later
"classical descriptions"