Theoretically we should be able to setup an experiment that can measure the attraction between two small objects

But such an experiment does not exist

Really makes you wonder if this magical nonsense is true 🤔

Yep

Plus there's also other ways to disprove gravity

Quite a few

Gravity is unproven and it's existence contradicts proven theories

Therefore it's quite obvious that gravity is wrong

Who here believes in gravity and who doesn't?

GR

General relativity

Newtonian gravity nor general relativity have been proven

Except they don't

Neither work as theories

Gravity and furthermore general relativity cannot be reconciled with one of the most successfully theories in physics.

They're not working theories

A complete theory of gravity would be quantum gravity

And there's a reason that doesn't exist

No it isn't

It doesn't exist in the quantum world

Simple as that

Why? Because it's utterly wrong.

Even though I have formally studied QM I feel no reason to tell you where

Doesn't change the fact that my claims are correct

If you attempt to apply perturbation theory to gravity you can't renormalize it afterwards.

Plus by trying to quantise the einstein-hilbert field equations we're only able to quantise the stress-energy-momentum tensor, not the metric tensor.

I mean, you can assert your own flawed preconceptions of a flat earther but they don't apply to all

In fact, learning more advanced physics helped me realize how wrong gravity is.

Quantim physics is the reason you're able to use whatever device you're own right now.

You think gravity=QM?

🤔

Oh here comes the ignorance

Is your argument that we dont understand QFT

The arguably most successful theory in physics?

Both

The first sentence was to both of you

I'm not "most fe"

Identify what needs further advancement

I'm starting to assume that you are someone who doesn't possess any knowledge of advanced physics

Yep there we are

@AstralSentient Do you even know QM

To claim a theory requires further advancement requires a decent understanding of said topic

@jeremy the globe model is wrong so I dont categories

Care*

@AstralSentient and what part of QM requires further advancement

There is no connection to gravity, and there never will be

Show me how to quantise the metric tensor of the einstein-hilbert field equations

Or how to successfully apply renormalization after applying perturbation theory to gravity

You don't understand.

Curving spacetime is the issue.

Do you even know GR?

I've already spoken to "experts in the field"

Majority of what I'm saying is physics established by scientist that believe your model.

Define gravity in GR.

🤔

Then why is he defending gravity?

You don't even know GR

GR's gravity has no actual proof

As a mathematical model it can predict things that align with the *globe* model

But when it comes to FE it doesn't

And the math behind GR leads to contradictions within itself

As sure as I am that GR is utter nonsense

UA is wrong

If you believe in the FES nonsense then you're completely wrong

Even globe earthers can debunk UA

Define the equivalence principle

What's the source of the acceleration

UA is made by a controlled opposition group

Lmao

Tell me this

Why did we first determine the equivalence principle

What mathematical relation led to it

🤔

I asked the question

I'll wait

It arises due to the fact that gravational mass is exactly equal to inertial mads

Mass*

I'm just demonstrating your ignorance

You don't know what you're citing

UA falls apart quite easily from numerous points of views

@AstralSentient so tell me, what's providing the infinite source of energy that allows UA

I'm rather curious

Then are you asserting that UA is right or wrong?

Perspective for the former and rayleigh scattering plus atmospheric extinction for the latter

Optics

Angular size and resolution are important

Indio made a good vid about it

Maybe

@Happygrandad do you know how they actually detect gravational waves?

@dustbreather you're a globe earther?

Are you a blind believer or do you have proof?

Plenty you say?

Why don't you name one

🤔

@Happygrandad and how did it actually do it

Stating they used lasers doesnt explain anything

Unless you actually understand the method they used you cant claim these were reliable and definite proof

@criticallyred what's your proof of a globe earth